Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theo

You are confusing religion with science. Scientists who confuse religion with science are not quacks. They are wrong. Religion is not science and science is not religion.

BTW, I did not equate 'creation science' with 'quackery'. I said it couldn't be elevated to the same level as 'quackery'. Because it is trying to equate religion with science it is more insidious.

And finally, my belief in God has nothing to do with evolution or science. Science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God, a higher being, a prime mover, etc. And it doesn't it try to.

Unfortunately, for over 500 years, some adherents of some religions are always attacking science thinking that science is attacking religion. It does not and never has.


322 posted on 01/18/2005 9:06:23 PM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: ml1954
You are confusing religion with science

No, I'm not.

Religion is not science and science is not religion

That is correct.

Science cannot prove or disprove the existence of God

That is correct as well, by definition.

Unfortunately, for over 500 years, some adherents of some religions are always attacking science thinking that science is attacking religion

That statement belies your anti-fact bias against creationism. The following is a partial list of "adherents to some religions" (Christianity) who were both scientists and creationists. Note that the "founder" of the scientific method was a creation science adherent. Note the names you've read in your textbooks showing up again and again....

Early

The Age of Newton

Just Before Darwin

Just After Darwin

The Modern Period


344 posted on 01/19/2005 7:09:44 AM PST by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson