1 posted on
01/17/2005 6:55:51 PM PST by
imskylark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: imskylark
26 posted on
01/17/2005 8:12:16 PM PST by
bitt
('every fifth round is a tracer')
To: imskylark
27 posted on
01/17/2005 8:13:45 PM PST by
Nick Danger
(The only way out is through)
To: imskylark
Yeah really. And they couldn't find proof any one who wanted to vote for Kerry was denied the opportunity to do so. Jean Francois is trying to pander to the kook base for a 2008 run. That's what this is all about.
28 posted on
01/17/2005 8:15:54 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: imskylark
Voting machines were distributed in uneven ways. In Democratic districts, it took people four, five, eleven hours to vote, while Republicans (went) through in 10 minutesYeah, and have you ever noticed how there is always a line outside the women's restroom at any large event while the men's room has none??? (Do you suppose there is a link???)
30 posted on
01/17/2005 8:29:27 PM PST by
E=MC<sup>2</sup>
(...And on the 666th day, satan created the demonrat party.)
To: imskylark
Is there no end to the squealing and boo-hooing by these people? Saw Jenny Bakus on Fox this evening and she still has her talking points down pat.....still has the startled look of someone just pinched in a crowded elevator, too.
31 posted on
01/17/2005 8:41:06 PM PST by
Adrastus
(I am locked and loaded with a clear field of fire.)
To: imskylark
The Democratic president(Clinton)/candidate's(Gore,Kerry) have no class what so ever. Just visited the Nixon library, Yorba Linda, CA Yesterday. I had to repent of all the bad things I had against, Nixon. 1960 Nixon/JFK election there was about 110K difference in the vote with over 60m votes and Nixon conceded. During Watergate, Nixon resigned as the charge obstruction of justice was to be leveled against him (same as Clinton) I changed parties in 1999 cause the Democratic Senator from, Nebraska (Bob Kerry)failed to do what is right.
32 posted on
01/17/2005 8:43:50 PM PST by
the_daug
To: imskylark
Dis is da same trash dat appeahs from time to time to ensuah dat da negras know dat white fokes is oppressin dem.
Kerry is yet another voting rights pimp. I'm waiting for an honest analysis of the distribution of voting machines in Ohio.
33 posted on
01/17/2005 8:46:58 PM PST by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye Shall Find)
To: imskylark
Weaseling his way on all sides again. He stood down long enough for things to be "done". Now that its to late he'll be out trumpeting the far-left cause celeb.
Now he can claim he was once again "all things to all people" and wonder why folks seem to notice what he's really up to.
36 posted on
01/17/2005 8:55:45 PM PST by
festus
(The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
To: imskylark; Libertarianize the GOP; bigfootbob
Oh there was disenfranchisement all right but it was in the State of Washington.
38 posted on
01/17/2005 8:57:54 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Congratulation. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
To: imskylark
Hey, he cares! Most of Terry Kerry's household servants who aren't illegal aliens are black!
42 posted on
01/17/2005 9:01:45 PM PST by
Tacis
(Democrats! - When You Need America Blamed Or A Pool Peed In!!)
To: imskylark
"In a nation which is willing to spend several hundred million dollars in Iraq to bring them democracy, we cannot tolerate that too many people here in America were denied that democracy," Kerry said. He isn't even effective fanning the fire of discontentment and rejection. What a loser.
To: imskylark
Sen. John Kerry (search), in some of his most pointed public comments yet about the presidential election, invoked Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy on Monday as he criticized President Bush and decried reports of voter disenfranchisement (search). The Massachusetts Democrat, Bush's challenger in November, spoke at Boston's annual Martin Luther King Day Breakfast. He reiterated that he decided not to challenge the election results, but "thousands of people were suppressed in the effort to vote." Ok. I'm confused here.
de·cry (d-krî') tr.v., -cried, -cry·ing, -cries.
1) To condemn openly.
2) To depreciate (currency, for example) by official proclamation or by rumor.
"...he criticized President Bush and decried reports of voter disenfranchisement."
Or to state it differently using the above definition...
"...he criticized President Bush and openly condemned reports of voter disenfranchisement."
Then we have...
He reiterated that he decided not to challenge the election results, but "thousands of people were suppressed in the effort to vote."
First Kerry and now the AP. Apparently flip-flopping is communicable.
To: imskylark
"Disenfranchisement" = Democrat euphemism for "We got stomped in the elections again".
57 posted on
01/18/2005 5:29:39 AM PST by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson