Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy 'Leaning Against' Gonzales
NewsMax ^ | 1/17/05 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 01/17/2005 5:13:13 PM PST by wagglebee

While most of his Democratic Senate colleagues say they will vote to confirm attorney general nominee Alberto Gonzales despite their misgivings about his role in shaping Bush administration policies for treating terrorists, Sen. Edward Kennedy says he is "leaning against" confirmation.

Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation," the Massachusettes senator said he was dissatisfied with Gonzales's answers under questioning - that the administration will not tolerate torture while at the same time defending his claims that the protections of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to alleged terrorists, the Washington Post reported.

"He had conversations with the Justice Department; he couldn't remember those," Kennedy said. "He couldn't remember many different kinds of facts. ... This nominee is the principal architect, it appears, for the development of the changes in the Geneva Convention, and torture. And he has an opportunity in response to these questions to explain it. I don't think he did."

An aide to the Senate Democratic leadership told the Post that Democrats are considering invoking a committee rule to postpone consideration of the Gonzales nomination for a week because they have not yet received answers to follow-up questions they have submitted to him.

The aide, however, added that although the Democrats have policy differences with Gonzales, they have found nothing that would automatically disqualify him, and that Gonzales would still eventually be confirmed.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: attorneygeneral; bleedingheartattack; edwardkennedy; gonzales; kennedy; prisonerabuse; torture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation," the Massachusettes senator said he was dissatisfied with Gonzales's answers under questioning - that the administration will not tolerate torture while at the same time defending his claims that the protections of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to alleged terrorists,

Someone needs to sober this a**hole up and remind him that all of these "alleged" terrorists have fared far better than Mary Jo Kopechne did.

1 posted on 01/17/2005 5:13:16 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I am not suprised Sen. Kennedy is leaning. He usually is three sheets in the wind.


2 posted on 01/17/2005 5:15:24 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Kennedy 'Leaning Against' Gonzales

Goodness! He could CRUSH the poor man!

3 posted on 01/17/2005 5:16:01 PM PST by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Kennedy is leaning against a bar.


4 posted on 01/17/2005 5:16:33 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee


Fat, Drunk and Stupid
is no way to go through
life

5 posted on 01/17/2005 5:17:18 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
that the administration will not tolerate torture while at the same time defending his claims that the protections of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to alleged terrorists, the Washington Post reported.

They don't, fatboy. Try reading the treaty during the brief window in the morning that you are between last night's hangover and today's liquid lunch.

6 posted on 01/17/2005 5:17:44 PM PST by dirtboy (To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Buzzcut
Goodness! He could CRUSH the poor man!

Nah, suffocation is more likely if Gonzales gets pushed too far into a skin fold.

7 posted on 01/17/2005 5:18:26 PM PST by dirtboy (To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

So, Killer Kennedy is "leaning". All I have to say is.... TIMBER!!!!!!!


8 posted on 01/17/2005 5:19:33 PM PST by LisaMalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Try reading the treaty during the brief window in the morning that you are between last night's hangover and today's liquid lunch.

I've never tried, but I'm guessing it's pretty tough to read when you're puking in the toilet.

9 posted on 01/17/2005 5:19:55 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

In Uncle Ted's drunken mind, "waterboarding" Mary Jo Kopechne was justified but doing the same to Al Qaeda terrorists is a human rights atrocity. And his opposition to Alberto Gonzales is based on the premise torturing terrorists amounts to depriving them of air conditioning. For crying out loud, we're not even killing them! Then I'm sure we'd see the senior Senator from Massachusetts hit the roof.


10 posted on 01/17/2005 5:20:02 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"He couldn't remember many different kinds of facts..."

What a maroon. There aren't "different" kinds of "facts" are there? There are just plain, old FACTS!

Why can't this waste of oxygen go into some sort of liver-diseased septic shock and just put us all out of our misery?

I'd better be careful what I wish for. Can you imagine the funeral they'll have for this dope? The wailing, the rending of cloth, the gnashing of teeth, the tearing of hair...it will be horrid!


11 posted on 01/17/2005 5:20:26 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Indeed they should. Kennedy is a complete slimeball, saved from criminal punishment and propelled into politics only by his family name.

However, from my perspective about the only reason to support Gonzales is because he irks people like Kennedy so much. Gonzales is absolutely terrible on immigration, and was chiefly responsible for Bush's betrayal of conservatives in the University of Michigan racial preferences case decided by the Sup Court two years ago, when he torpedoed Solicitor General Ted Olson's principled objection to using race as a factor, and instead made it official administration policy to accept the diversity rationale (i.e. that achieving it is such a compelling state interest that it justifies racial preferences). Who knows how much that played into Sandra Day O'Connor's decisive vote for preferences.

As Attorney General, we could expect him to be worthless in enforcing immigration laws, and totally unresponsive to reverse discrimination.

But, a possible silver-lining could be if it means Bush won't nominate him to the Sup Court, where he'd be even more dangerous.


12 posted on 01/17/2005 5:21:40 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
I see he is leaning left in this photo...

If he leans any further, he'll tip the whole boat!

13 posted on 01/17/2005 5:22:18 PM PST by kstewskis ( you have to have a mind before you lose it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Kennedy is a pompous drunken ass. His legacy, sadly, will be Chappaquiddick and the horrible events that surrounded it.
14 posted on 01/17/2005 5:23:23 PM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

"Can you imagine the funeral they'll have for this dope?"

8 to 10 pallbearers. One of them will probably be Osama bin Osama Obama.


15 posted on 01/17/2005 5:23:28 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

i tried that once when I was in college. I decided it was not doable.


16 posted on 01/17/2005 5:24:03 PM PST by queenkathy (We'll have a BALL at the BALL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Big surprise.


17 posted on 01/17/2005 5:24:07 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I can't think of a better endorsement for Gonzales than this.


18 posted on 01/17/2005 5:25:01 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Don't get eliminated!" - MXC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
This,

"...he was dissatisfied with Gonzales's answers ...that the protections of the Geneva Conventions do not apply to alleged terrorists

from the human with no detectable conscience.

19 posted on 01/17/2005 5:26:13 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kstewskis

He's wearing sunglasses because the glare off the pink elephants he seeing is blinding him.


20 posted on 01/17/2005 5:26:15 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson