Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Jeez, more BS comparisions with Vietnam. When are the damn pinks going to stop talking about VIetnam? After all, it was a couple of dumb-@ss libs who got us into that mess in the first place.
1 posted on 01/16/2005 5:21:06 PM PST by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Jacob Kell
Also here.
2 posted on 01/16/2005 5:22:34 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Maybe they figure if they say it enough times, people will start to agree. I'm not a democrat so I don't know why that would be a good thing however.


3 posted on 01/16/2005 5:23:51 PM PST by kika_chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell
Viet Nam was the original JFK's Viet Nam, though it overwhelmed Johnson and Nixon. Iraq does seem more in the interests of the US to start large scale reform in the ME (not to speak of the fact that N VN did not directly attack the US mainland, though they were messing with their neighbors). Less oil in SE Asia. Bush still has a good chance on effecting lasting net positive change in the ME and has certainly directed atention away from the US homeland.
5 posted on 01/16/2005 5:30:05 PM PST by Paladin2 (SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell
Dear Ted,

A bit of friendly advice: you're getting elderly and haven't cared well for your health these past few decades. It may be a good idea to be thinking of where your soul is likely to spend eternity and focus your attention in that direction rather than continuing the bitter partisan attacks of your younger earthly conterparts. You may have deferred earthly judgement concerning your treatment of Mary Jo for a few decades, but ultimate judgement is soon to come.

P.S. The ACLU and the Democratic machine hold no sway with the court you will face.

9 posted on 01/16/2005 5:40:38 PM PST by Denver Ditdat (Ronald Reagan belongs to the ages now, but we preferred it when he belonged to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

And Chappaquidick was Mary Jo Kopechne graveyard. Too bad it wasn't Teddy's Cambodia or Vietnam.

I am so sick of the Vietnam allusion. Vietnam was due to the left's cowardice and treason.


10 posted on 01/16/2005 5:44:45 PM PST by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Nobody watches the show and nobody cares what "The Floater" thinks. So, it's a double nobody story!


11 posted on 01/16/2005 5:46:33 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell
Can I say this here?????

I.hate.ted.kennedy.

12 posted on 01/16/2005 5:47:09 PM PST by Lion in Winter (I ain't no pussy cat... don't mess with me... ya hear! GRRRRRRrrr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

"Iraq is clearly George Bush's Vietnam", said kennedy...

How would he know?
ted kennedy hasn't seen anything "clearly" for over 2 decades.


13 posted on 01/16/2005 5:56:30 PM PST by yer gonna put yer eye out (Gettin' a PhD (Prettyhard on Democrats) at FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

14 posted on 01/16/2005 5:57:57 PM PST by lormand (Yankee Go Home!...but please take me with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell
12 Feb 55 - President Eisenhower's administration sends 1st 350 U.S. advisers to South Vietnam
to train the South Vietnamese Army
08 Jun 56 - 1st American advisor was killed
5 Sep 56 - President Eisenhower tells a news conference that the French are
"involved in a hopelessly losing war in Indochina"




From a Must Visit Site
Vipers Vietnam Veterans Page, A Vietnam Veteran & Proud Web Site
About Vietnam

The Vietnam war was the longest in our nation's history.
1st American advisor was killed on June 08, 1956,

and the last casualties in connection with the war occurred on May 15, 1975, during the Mayaquez incident. Approximately 2.7 million Americans served in the war zone; 300,000 were wounded and approximately 75,000 permanently disabled. Officially there are still 1,991 Americans unaccounted for from SE Asia.

Vietnam was a savage, in your face war where death could and did strike from anywhere with absolutely no warning. The brave young men and women who fought that war paid an awful price of blood, pain and suffering. As it is said: "ALL GAVE SOME ... SOME GAVE ALL"
The Vietnam war was not lost on the battlefield. No American force in ANY other conflict fought with more determination or sheer courage than the Vietnam Veteran.  For the first time in our history America sent it's young men and women into a war run by inept politicians who had no grasp of military strategies and no moral will to win. They were led by "top brass" who were concerned mainly with furthering their own careers, most neither understood the nature of the war nor had a clue about the impossible mission with which they'd tasked their soldiers.  And the war was reported by a self serving Media who penned stories filled with inaccuracies, deliberate omissions, biased presentations and blatant distorted interpretations because they were more interested in a story than the truth! It can be debated that we should never have fought that war. It can also be argued that the young Americans who fought so courageously, never losing a single major battle, helped in a huge way to WIN THE COLD WAR.

15 posted on 01/16/2005 5:58:06 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

And "Chappaqui-DICK" screwed your presidency!


16 posted on 01/16/2005 6:14:44 PM PST by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Ah, Ted, in case your rot gutted mind forgot,
Islamo-Terrorists declared war on America September 11, 2001

17 posted on 01/16/2005 6:22:13 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

He's not even worth commenting on.


18 posted on 01/16/2005 6:33:51 PM PST by the_rightside (Union Corruption : http://www.nlpc.org/artindx.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

A liver is a terrible thing to waste, Ted. So's a brain.


20 posted on 01/16/2005 7:08:34 PM PST by prairiebreeze (George W Bush: Spending well-earned political capital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Teddy should go back to making commecials for Oldsmobile.


22 posted on 01/16/2005 7:14:01 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Dear Ted: Stifle yourself. If your dad hadn't struck it rich, you would be sitting in some obscure bar in Southie getting bombed.


24 posted on 01/16/2005 7:24:13 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

How does this malevolent buffoon remain both alive and in office?


27 posted on 01/16/2005 8:12:14 PM PST by manic4organic (We won. Get over it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

Is this anything along the lines of, oh, say Teddy Kennedy's Chappaquiddick? - A comparison ought to be out there somewhere; though it escapes me.


28 posted on 01/16/2005 8:14:54 PM PST by Twinkie (Iced Tea Made From Tea Leaves And Sweetened Just Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

I don't think that Iraq would be America's or Bush's Vietnam War. Iraq and Vietnam are two different stories. The Vietnam War are all part of the cold war whose purpose was to test American military equipment in battle against Russian military equipment. While it may appear to be a local war, the Vietnam War was really part of a larger war between the United States and Russia. That is why the participants were very enthusiastic about the outcome of the war.

That Iraq's future being one of the new democracies in the Middle East cannot be denied. It is just a matter of time when the new Iraqi government sets up a successful republican government in Iraq sans Saddam's dictatorship. Iraq's new government will be different from the Islamic government in Iran. Except for the violent overthrow of the former Saddam government, the new Iraqi government has not used terrorism to put down its opponents unlike the Iranian revolutionaries. It is a republican government that was installed by the Americans using the most acceptable forms of republicanism found in the West. There are no concentration camps in Iraq and neither does an Iraqi fear execution should he not found favor with the new government. When Khomeini took over Iran, there were plenty of executions to take care of dissidents who could not be assimilated to the new Iranian hegemony. The new Iraqi government will be a centerpoint of Islamic republicanism much more different from Islamic republicanism practised in Iran. Dissent will be tolerated and the people can always change the form of government they want. This is not possible in Iran.


29 posted on 01/16/2005 9:24:39 PM PST by Ramonchito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jacob Kell

32 posted on 01/17/2005 4:36:54 AM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson