Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Participation in 2004 presidential election highest since 1968: study
Yahoo.com ^ | AFP

Posted on 01/16/2005 4:45:13 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi

WASHINGTON (AFP) - More than 122 million Americans, or 60.7 percent of registered voters, cast ballots in the November 2 presidential election, which saw US President George W. Bush win a second four-year term, a new study showed.
The showing marked the highest turnout for a US presidential election since 1968.
According to the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate, Bush secured some 62 million votes, or 50.8 percent of the ballots -- an increase of 11.5 million over his showing in 2000.
His challenger, Democrat John Kerry, garnered more than 59 million votes (48.3 percent), or eight million more votes than Democrat Al Gore received in 2000.
Independent candidate Ralph Nader obtained just over 440,000 votes (0.4 percent), down sharply from the more than 2.8 million he received in 2000.
Still, while 6.4 percent more voters turned out for the 2004 election than the 2000 polls, according to CSAE, a whopping 78 million eligible voters opted not to participate.
The group said that Bush won with support from around 30.8 percent of eligible voters.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; bush2; bushii; cheney; election; georgewbush; highestturnout; participation; president; record; victory; vote; w
A response to liberals' crocks


1 posted on 01/16/2005 4:45:14 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP; superskunk; CThomasFan; Libertina; presidio9; american colleen; sinkspur; ...
PING!
2 posted on 01/16/2005 4:46:13 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

my heroes have always been cowboys...


3 posted on 01/16/2005 4:48:18 AM PST by an italian (We are proud B countries: Bush, Berlusconi and Blair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Presidents George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan are two of the best U.S. presidents in history.


4 posted on 01/16/2005 4:55:47 AM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Participation in 2004 presidential election highest since 1968: study

Yeah, including 100,000 more voters in Milwaukie than actually existed, and 3000 more voters in Seattle than actually existed.

5 posted on 01/16/2005 4:59:00 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Republicans have won in both of the elections with the highest voter turnouts since 1968. That should refute those who say that a high turnout favors Democrats.


6 posted on 01/16/2005 4:59:47 AM PST by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
a whopping 78 million eligible voters opted not to participate.

Oh well, the RATS called out enough dead, convicts and illegals to make up for that number.

7 posted on 01/16/2005 5:00:19 AM PST by prairiebreeze (George W Bush: Spending well-earned political capital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
Site Meter
With that kind of turnout - I guess its easy enough to confirm that it was the most important election of our lifetime...
8 posted on 01/16/2005 5:07:07 AM PST by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djpg

America is a conservative nation, not liberal, so high turnouts favor Republicans.


9 posted on 01/16/2005 5:16:26 AM PST by Reader of news
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dubya's fan
IMHO George Bush is actually a better President than Ronald Reagan, because I will never forgive President Reagan for not doing something to avenge our Marines in Lebanon.
10 posted on 01/16/2005 5:21:41 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

... animals, plants, terrorists, spacemen... voted for Kerry!


11 posted on 01/16/2005 5:27:55 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
The group said that Bush won with support from around 30.8 percent of eligible voters.

So, what's up with this nonsense stat? What did your boy Clintooon get in 1992? Was it about 20% of the eligible voters?

12 posted on 01/16/2005 5:53:10 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 01/16/2005 7:17:08 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
We are told that if the 20% of Sunnis in Iraq don't vote, that election will be illegitimate.

At the same time, we have have close to 40% non-participation in our country. And that doesn't even factor in the non-participation of non-registered voters.

14 posted on 01/16/2005 7:41:27 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle; All

The article is wrong. The turnout this year was 60.7 percent of eligible (not just registered) voters, aka VAP (Voting Age Population). As a percentage of registered voters, the turnout was close to 80%. AFP has butchered the AP release.


15 posted on 01/16/2005 8:08:28 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Perhaps you're right.


16 posted on 01/16/2005 8:17:13 AM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi
"The group said that Bush won with support from around 30.8 percent of eligible voters."

So? Clinton won with the votes of about 16% of the people who were or could be eligible to vote.

17 posted on 01/16/2005 8:26:35 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi

...and I helped.


18 posted on 01/16/2005 8:30:14 AM PST by SmithL (ex-Boomer Rider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alessandrofiaschi; Happy2BMe

19 posted on 01/16/2005 9:41:59 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle; alessandrofiaschi
We are told that if the 20% of Sunnis in Iraq don't vote, that election will be illegitimate. At the same time, we have have close to 40% non-participation in our country. And that doesn't even factor in the non-participation of non-registered voters.

The Sunnis are about to learn that the bedrock of the democratic process is the exercise of free will.

A truly free people will not be forced to vote or to stay home on election day by their Government.

Those who strive to be a free people will sometimes have to stand up and fight those who would deny them the right to vote. An outside power will not always be there to do their fighting for them.

After the coming election, the Sunnis will learn that the Shiites and the Kurds have exercised their free will and have defied those who would deny them the right to vote. The Shiites and the Kurds will therefore reap the benefits of political power achieved through the democratic process.

The Sunnis, on the other hand, as a result of cowardice or as a result of a conscious intimidation and boycott will stay away from the polls. They, and their Left-wing allies, share the political goal of ensuring that the Bush Administrations goal of a democratic Iraq fails and will claim that the elections are "illegitimate".

That is a cynical game that the U.S. and Iraq must refuse to play.

The Sunnis were given the chance at democracy and if, through thuggery or cowardice, they turn their back on it, it is the result of the Sunni community's free will.

The Sunnis will be politically powerless until the next election cycle and they will have nobody else but themselves to blame.

If they desire their share of political power after the next election cycle, it will be their responsibility to eliminate the Sunnis within their own community who would deny them their right to vote.

Freedom is not free.

20 posted on 01/16/2005 10:21:47 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson