..... But in this case it was a clear opportunity by the MSM (CBS, Rather and Mapes went after this with a fury) to use this against the Military and ultimately the war in Iraq and GWB and for that reason Graner had to be a scapegoat for more punishment than his crime deserves.Yes. The punishment definitely doesn't fit the crime, imho.
Speaking of the Old Media ..... it will be interesting to see the reaction from the New York Slimes. It was THEY that ran Abu-Ghraib headlines for ~28 CONSECUTIVE days - even when there was NO NEW information to report, it was front page news in their biased rag. I can imagine their take is that the punishment is too lenient. Whatcha wanna bet?
Here is Google News Search for Graner New York Times,
and the current top listings there:Search news pages that contain the term Graner New York +Times.
Washington TimesRingleader in Prisoner Abuse Speaks at Sentencing
New York Times -16 hours ago
... I didnt enjoy anything I did there, the reservist, Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., told the jury at the end of three hours answering questions from ...
US Soldier Found Guilty in Iraq Prison Abuse CaseNew York Times
Military Jury Begins Deliberations in Iraqi Prison Abuse CaseNew York Times
Defense Rests in Prison Abuse TrialNew York Times New York Times -New York Times -all 2,666 related »
Soldiers Testify on Orders to Soften Prisoners in Iraq
New York Times -Jan 12, 2005
... The testimony about orders formed the backbone of the defense as lawyers for Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., the Army reservist accused of being the ...
Portraits Differ as Trial Opens in Prison Abuse
New York Times -Jan 10, 2005
... In opening arguments here at the court-martial for the soldier, Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., his lawyers insisted that he was simply following orders and ...
Syrian Prisoner's Account of Abuse Is Heard at Trial
New York Times -Jan 11, 2005
... The reservist, Specialist Charles A. Graner, watched as another soldier urinated on the detainee, the detainee testified, and made another detainee eat from a ...
Defense Witness Says Abuse in Iraqi Prison Was Ordered
New York Times -Jan 12, 2005
... Testimony from Private Frederick and others about orders formed the backbone of the defense argument as lawyers for Specialist Charles A. Graner, Jr., accused ...
Detainees Depict Abuses by Guard in Prison in Iraq
New York Times -Jan 11, 2005
... footsteps running," one of the detainees, Hussein Mutar, testified by videotape on Tuesday at the military trial here for Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., the ...
New Photos and Video Unveiled in Trial of Iraqi Prison Abuse
New York Times -Jan 10, 2005
... In opening arguments at the court martial for the soldier, Specialist Charles A. Graner, his lawyers insisted he was simply following orders, and using lessons ...
Court-Martial Will Hear Taped Testimony of Prisoners
New York Times -Jan 7, 2005
... The reservist, Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., 36, is the first soldier to face a contested trial in the abuse case, which broke open last spring with the ...
Jury Selection Begins in Trial of GI at Abu Ghraib
New York Times -Jan 7, 2005
... Charles A. Graner Jr., of Uniontown, Pa., who is charged with of conspiracy to maltreat detainees, assault and committing indecent acts in a series of abuses ...
Today's front page article from the New York Slimes:Ringleader in Iraqi Prisoner Abuse
Is Sentenced to 10 YearsABU GHRAIB SCANDAL
Ringleader in Iraqi Prisoner Abuse Is Sentenced to 10 Years
By KATE ZERNIKE
Published: January 16, 2005
ORT HOOD, Tex., Jan. 15 - The Army reservist found guilty of being the ringleader of the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison was sentenced Saturday to 10 years in military prison after telling the jury that he had repeatedly complained about orders to treat detainees harshly but that he had been told to go along.
The reservist, Specialist Charles A. Graner Jr., faced a maximum sentence of 15 years. The jury deliberated for two hours before delivering the sentence, which also reduced his rank to private, the lowest possible, and ordered him dishonorably discharged from the military.
Specialist Graner's case was the first contested court-martial in the abuse scandal that set off international outrage against the United States military and led to nine high-level Pentagon investigations into reports of abuse at American detention centers in Iraq and Afghanistan and at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
"I didn't enjoy anything I did there," Specialist Graner told the jury at the end of three hours of answering questions from his lawyer Saturday morning. "A lot of it was wrong, a lot of it was criminal."
They were his first public comments about what happened at the prison and about the photographs that became symbols of the abuse scandal - detainees bound and cowering, or naked, hooded and forced into sexually humiliating poses.
"I can see, to a layperson, a lot of things happen in prison that may look wrong," Specialist Graner said as his lawyer displayed the photos on a screen. "A lot of things happen in prison that are wrong. But you can have a use of force that looks bad that can be justified."
Specialist Graner, a 36-year-old former prison guard from Western Pennsylvania, spoke to the jury the morning after it found him guilty on charges of assault, maltreatment, conspiracy, indecent acts and dereliction of duty.
He declined to take an oath that would have allowed him to be questioned by the prosecution and the jury.
The explanations he gave for the photographs and the upbeat e-mail messages he sent home about them were starkly different from the picture prosecutors painted of someone who abused detainees, as one prosecutor said, "for laughs, for sport."
Specialist Graner swiveled his chair nervously, occasionally smiling, laughing and gesturing as he explained his actions. He did not deny that the abuse occurred.
Demonstrating how he hit a detainee, he smacked his fist into his hand so loudly that it jolted the small courtroom. But he insisted that he and other military police soldiers were treating detainees harshly at the behest of military intelligence officers who were eager to get better information from them.
When he complained to a superior, he said, "his advice to me was that if M.I. is asking you to do this, it needs to be done. They're in charge, follow their orders."
The broad smiles and thumbs up he gave as he posed behind piles of bound detainees, he said, came from a kind of gallows humor.
"There was a lot of things that we did that were so screwed up that if you didn't look at them as they were funny, you couldn't deal with them," he said.
Asked to explain a photograph of himself stitching up the face of a detainee he admitted hitting, he said he punched the man after telling him three times in Arabic to stay quiet.
"I told you once, I told you twice, if I had to tell you a third time, you got a slap in the head," he said.
Specialist Graner insisted that he was not the sadist the prosecutors described. He went into Abu Ghraib, he said, believing that "all we were going to do was feed them, make sure they were alive when I came onto the shift, make sure they were alive when I left the shift."
He contradicted some of the testimony from witnesses earlier in the week. Other soldiers testified that they had repeatedly been told not to take photographs, and that they would have known that orders to hit prisoners or put them in humiliating positions were wrong.
Maj. Michael Holley, the lead prosecutor, urged the jury to deliver the maximum sentence. "The hour for Specialist Graner to be responsible has arrived," he said.
Major Holley asked the jury not to believe Specialist Graner's statements that he had abused detainees to save the lives of American soldiers.
"Do not let him trade on the honor and sacrifice of your brothers," he told the jury of six enlisted soldiers and four officers, all combat veterans.
"If the maximum punishment was ever appropriate for an accused," Major Holley said, "it is this accused."
Specialist Graner's lawyer, Guy Womack, repeated the assertion he made throughout the trial that the military was making his client the scapegoat for higher-ranking military intelligence soldiers, several of whom have been implicated in a Pentagon investigation, but not charged.
Specialist Graner is one of seven soldiers charged in the Abu Ghraib scandal; three already have pleaded guilty.
Outside the courtroom, Specialist Graner's mother, Irma, said her son was being punished "for something he was told to do," Agence France-Presse reported.
"It's the higher-ups that should be on trial," Ms. Graner said. "They let the little guys take the fall for them. But the truth will come out eventually."
Specialist Graner, who had been free to roam the base here during his trial, left the court building in shackles. Fort Hood officials said he would be transferred to the Bell County Jail until a place for him could be found in a military prison.
LM Otero/Associated PressArmy Spc. Charles Graner Jr. is taken into custody
in shackles after he was sentenced to 10 years in his
court-martial at Fort Hood, Texas.
"THEY that ran Abu-Ghraib headlines for ~28 CONSECUTIVE days - even when there was NO NEW information to report, it was front page news in their biased rag."
That really says a lot doesn't it. I don't believe NYT ran stories on 9/11, Beslan school massacre or the Train bombings in Spain for 28 straight days... but then that wouldn't aide their agenda.
"I can imagine their take is that the punishment is too lenient. Whatcha wanna bet?"
No bet. ;)
It's not fit to a) line a bird cage; b) give a puppy a place to pee; c) wrap fish bones; d) wipe oneself after taking a Kerry.
Still waiting for the Times' Walter Duranty to be stripped of the Pulitzer Prize he was awarded for covering up Stalin's murder of ten million by engineered famine.
Speaking of abu Ghraib: