Posted on 01/15/2005 2:32:03 PM PST by AVNevis
Per MSNBC
stupid!!!! he is scapegoat just like lt. calley was.
Damn a politician that will hang a soldier out to dry to look good.
Secondly, not one of the detainees who were abused .. against, it should be noted, a written SOP/rules of engagement specifically laying out what could and could not be done to detainees .. were there for intelligence purposes. Every one had been picked up and was being incarcerated for "common crimes": theft, assault, attempted rape (Iraqi-on-Iraqi), and .. in the case of one female who was forced to strip so this "fine upstanding young soldier" and his buddies could get some nude photos .. prostitution. So, for no more purpose than their own enjoyment, they successfully disobeyed standing orders against maltreatment for no reason at all. Testimony came out that specifically stated that Graner was, in general, someone who didn't obey orders or regulations: he had been repeatedly called to the carpet for uniform violations, wearing unauthorized patches on his uniform, haircut violations, and disrespect to senior NCOs and officers. Simply put, he did what he wanted to do when he wanted to do it, and d@mn the leadership.
Third, he repeated violated the posted directives in the confinement area that no cameras were permitted in the cell areas, in the hard site, or within Abu Ghraib prison. He also violated procedures by allowing his girlfriend, Lynndie England .. a person who had no standing as either an MP or an MI .. to enter the secured areas for no more reason than to have their pictures taken together.
Fourth, the pictures quite clearly show someone who was enjoying his work. Despite his right to not testify, when the trial began, his attorney stated that he was so confident of his legal standing that Graner wanted to testify to tell his side of the story. Needless to say, he did not do so .. at least, until the sentencing portion of the case when he made an UNSWORN statement, which is not evidence, merely a "here's who I am, don't punish me for what I did" kind of statement.
Finally, discipline is the cast-iron rod that holds units together. This was an undisciplined vigilante posse who decided that, because they could do these things, they would. (Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Isn't that what Clinton said for his excuse?) From almost Day 1 in the military, you're trained to obey orders, but you're also told that YOU .. personally and individually .. only have to obey legal orders. Probably the only thing that Graner truthfully said in the proceedings was that he knew that these were illegal and, in his words, immoral orders. Yet he said that he obeyed them nonetheless. As a Corporal, a non-commissioned officer in the military, that, in and of itself, is enough to demand some serious jail time. The old "I was only obeying orders" died at Nuremberg.
When push comes to shove, if you were arrested for assault or theft, and not yet prosecuted or sentenced, would YOU or your children want to be incarcerated in this man's jail?
He's a uniformed bully .. one of the few times that I've actually seen one of those archetypical "jackbooted thugs" that a lot of people on FreeRepublic are always so worried about. Yet it is those same people who seem to be defending this scum and his unrestrained posse.
Samauri Court Reporter
An associate of mine's uncle was tortured during WWII.. he returned from the war with no teeth, the enemy had pulled them all out... no finger or toenails... these two had been removed (and none of these were removed surgically with anesthetic for you idiot leftists who might be reading this.) He had to have his penis amputated because they slid a glass rod into it and then hit it with a hammer shattering it.
He came back from the war, bought some land and fired his rifle at anyone who approached... one day he just disappeared... it is assumed he wandered off into his woods to die.
This man was tortured! This man suffered complete and abject inhumanity that destroyed his life. This man was a uniformed soldier fighting for the United States and her allies.
Compare this to the reality of this prison scandal in Iraq, where terrorists, not fighting in uniform or for any nation attempt to kill innocent civilians in the most heinous methods possible. They had their genetalia mocked and laughed at and had to eat pork and drink alcohol... and there are some reports of beatings.
Now please don't tell me these terrorists were tortured, you lie to yourself if you think this remotely compares to torture.
What terrorists? See Post #442.
Well said. How 'bout even after prosecution and sentencing. This behavior would not be tolerated in a US penitentiary, and rightly so.
Once the facts came out regarding the status of the incarcerated Iraqis, I had a real problem with this.
Another thing--If we were going to use "alternative methods of information extraction" on detainees with "intelligence value", I would hope that there is at least some professionalism involved.
Not "Beavis and Butthead, Prison Guards" (an MTV(TM) Production).
Eternally mystifying to me. Defending this is like defending a tumor because it's a "part" of your mother. Well, I don't believe in defending cancers - I believe you cut that f***er right out, before it spreads and does serious harm to the thing you honor and respect.
It is not the damage it did that should determine the sentence - it is the crime that should determine it. Ten years is too harsh.
"Defending this is like defending a tumor"
Exactly, Let me get this straight...The little E-3 has his unauthorized girlfriend into the prison during the mid shift and take their sick porn pictures of the prisoners. These activities are in no way part of the official interrogation process.
The contraband photos end up being sent via the internet to his family(A Geneva Convention Violation). The pictures make it eventually to the media, undermining the war and casting aspersions on the 400,000 servicemen that have rolled through Iraq.
Lockem up and throw away the key!
She needs something more than a slap on the wrist.
She needs something more than a slap on the wrist.
To reiterate my thoughts on Karpinski:
In the glory days of the Royal Navy, orders directing an officer to take command of a ship concluded with "Fail not in this charge at your own peril." And their Lordships were in deadly earnest about that.
IMNHO, Karpinski should be executed pour encourager l'autres.
Who, I'll wager, was a bully in civilian life.
Many thanks for your fascinating reports.
S**tcanned from at least one civilian prison job for doing this stuff...and firing a goobermint employee is probably harder than getting a felony conviction against him.
Random execution of generals who fail is not something I would support. I wouldn't want to get into the situation of Russia circa 1942.
However, in this case, BG Karpinski did more than fail. Once she failed, she attempted to deflect blame, etc.
I agree with you. Execution is likely appropriate for her, and she should be brought to trial. The military and war are not just management exercises for Klinton's Korps to play at. General officers have impact on many lives, and they MUST be responsible personnel.
And they weren't all actually convicted, were they?
Will he complain when one of his guards smashes his head into the wall, leaving a bloody streak and him unconscious?
It is dumb. Would you want to sign up?
Most seem to think that Graner got exactly what he deserved. I think this was a Public Relations/Politically Correct (PR/PC) sentence and was pre-determined. I think this has done great harm to the military and more harm to this nation. This is war and war is hell. It is my opinion this fiasco has caused and will cause more military deaths than otherwise would have happened. You go to war for one reason, to win. You do not let PR/PC get in the way.
Don't worry, son. The military tries to avoid recruiting those who get their jollies from beating petty criminals, so they won't be interested in recruiting more folks like Graner.
Something in the middle with a symbol for Abu Graib. On the top "Charles Graner - Lyndde England", and on the bottom "Lost Cause".
Maybe I'd distribute some to Freepers as well, since, in fact, supporting the case of this guy and his co-horts is indeed a "lost cause."
Don't forget to send one to Graner. It's my understanding that he loved putting unauthorized patches on his uniform!
BlueLancer's post put it so well:
He's a uniformed bully .. one of the few times that I've actually seen one of those archetypical "jackbooted thugs" that a lot of people on FreeRepublic are always so worried about. Yet it is those same people who seem to be defending this scum and his unrestrained posse.
Stop right there! The ick-o-meter suddenly and violently self-destructed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.