Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain's Prince Harry rejects demands for further apology
AFP ^ | Fri, Jan 14, 2005

Posted on 01/14/2005 11:11:56 AM PST by jb6

LONDON (AFP) - Prince Harry, third in line to the British throne, rejected demands he make further apologies for having dressed as a Nazi at a costume party, after photographs of him sparked an international outcry.

AFP/Getty Images Photo

AFP Slideshow: Prince Harry's Nazi Costume Criticized

Michael Howard, leader of Britain's main opposition Conservative Party, was among several prominent people at home and abroad to demand that Harry go beyond his written statement and appear in person to apologize for the costume.

A royal family spokesman said "nothing more is needed" from the 20-year-old as his aunt Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, urged the media to back off in its criticism.

"We feel that Harry gave a full and public apology Wednesday as soon as it became clear that the photos could cause pain to people," said a spokesman for Clarence House, the office of Harry's father Prince Charles.

When Thursday's edition of The Sun newspaper hit the newsstands late Wednesday with a front-page photograph of Harry in a Nazi costume, Clarence House released a written statement of apology attributed to Harry.

"I am sorry if I caused any offence or embarrassment to anyone," said Harry, the younger son of Prince Charles and the late Princess Diana. "It was a poor choice of costume and I apologise."

The Sun said Prince Charles was also angry at his elder son William because he was with Harry when he chose the costume.

But Clarence House called "inaccurate" reports in Friday's edition of The Sun that Prince Charles ordered Harry and his brother William to make a private visit with Jewish charities to the former Nazi death camp at Auschwitz in Poland.

"That's not something that we're looking at at the moment," the spokesman said.

The royal family said Prince Edward, Queen Elizabeth II (news - web sites)'s youngest son and seventh in line to the throne, would attend the Auschwitz ceremony, as had been planned before the furore erupted.

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw would now attend the ceremony, upgrading the delegation previously led by minister of state for Europe, Denis MacShane, but the Foreign Office said the decision was "not in response to Prince Harry."

Clarence House said it was nonetheless looking at various invitations from Jewish and non-Jewish groups "to effectively do some sort of ... engagement in the future, or some education in the future" involving Harry.

A source close to the royal family also told AFP that the Jewish and non-Jewish groups which have been in contact with the royal family had not demanded that Harry make a public appearance to apologize.

Conservative leader Michael Howard, who is Jewish and had family members perish at Auschwitz, told BBC radio on Thursday that "I think it might be appropriate for him to tell us himself just how contrite he now is."

Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the US-based Simon Wiesenthal Centre, said Harry ought to go to Auschwitz for the 60th anniversary commemorations later this month.

In a poll by Totallyjewish.com, 84 percent of respondents in Britain said Harry should be sent on an educational trip to Auschwitz.

The furore showed little sign of abating as it drew protests from Jewish groups and politicians in Europe and Israel, as well as a roasting from the British and international media.

The press in Germany, where it is illegal to wear Nazi insignia, was stunned by the photographs.

Die Welt said "this is a scandal, not a slip by an insensitive prince who, as is well-known, is not exactly regarded as an intellectual giant of his generation."

The mass market Bild newspaper wondered what his late mother, Princess Diana, would have made of her youngest son's behaviour.

The Duchess of York was a virtual lone voice in defending Harry.

"I want someone to stand up for him and say he is a very good man, and I'm that person," Ferguson told BBC Radio.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: england; nazi; princeharry; royals; stupidity; whatwereuthinking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2005 11:11:57 AM PST by jb6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jb6

Yup, do not continue to feed a media frenzy.


2 posted on 01/14/2005 11:13:50 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

BRAT!!


3 posted on 01/14/2005 11:13:58 AM PST by handy old one (Never confuse the facts with the issues!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

He is nothing but a spoiled welp. If I was that stupid, even if drunk and caught on film, I'd be hung out to dry.


4 posted on 01/14/2005 11:14:15 AM PST by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

sheesh.....


5 posted on 01/14/2005 11:16:17 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Prince Harry looks like Will Ferrell


6 posted on 01/14/2005 11:17:12 AM PST by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

7 posted on 01/14/2005 11:18:37 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Totally agree. Yep it was stupid, but to keep harping on it...give me a break.


8 posted on 01/14/2005 11:19:27 AM PST by brooklyn dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6
"Die Welt said "this is a scandal, not a slip by an insensitive prince who, as is well-known, is not exactly regarded as an intellectual giant of his generation."

Why couldn't it have been a "slip up"? Afterall, Harry "is not exactly regarded as an intellectual giant". His sentence doesn't make sense which only brings one to the conclusion that these sharks aren't going to let up when they smell blood...

The press will once again test their ability to ruin people.

9 posted on 01/14/2005 11:20:26 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

This is not about just an apology, they want every member of the royal family to grovel and cry before the cameras.


10 posted on 01/14/2005 11:25:49 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Kinda reminds me of how the media treated Trent Lott for his remarks at Strom's birthday bash.


11 posted on 01/14/2005 11:28:45 AM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jb6
What if he had dressed up as Stalin? How about Mao? Would the reaction have been as vociferous? I doubt it. There is no doubt that people should remember what the genocidal Nazis did in WWII, but this reaction is ridiculous and belittles the memory of all those who were murdered. He was at a private costume party. He wasn't at a rally and he wasn't speaking sympathetically. Let the idiot be.
12 posted on 01/14/2005 11:30:28 AM PST by golch1979 ("Captain Sobel, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Didn't this hear this much fuss over the Rev Jackson's "hymie-town" remarks.


13 posted on 01/14/2005 11:32:42 AM PST by joonbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golch1979

You have to ask yourself this question...a costume shop goes out and has a Nazi uniform for rent...who would rent it? I can't think of a single person I know...that would rent the thing. Now, if you had a gorilla outfit, or a pirate outfit, or a Santa Claus suit...then maybe...but a Nazi outfit? I won't blame this kid...he had to have handlers behind him each day...and they should have advised him of the stupid situation.

I think the kid ought to be packed up and sent off to a ranch in southern Colorado for four years...and let him mature out of public sight. Thats the best way for a guy like him to get life-smart.


14 posted on 01/14/2005 11:36:41 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Oh thank the maker, another Harry dressed as hitler thread.


15 posted on 01/14/2005 11:37:18 AM PST by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Frankly, I'm more disturbed about the kind of upper-class British twits who would throw a "Colonials and Natives" party with one side of the room decorated in white and the other in black. This whole sorry scenario needs to be a Monty Python sketch.


16 posted on 01/14/2005 11:38:10 AM PST by saquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

He was stupid. Not a good move for someone like him.

He also never asked to be in the spotlight that he is.

The context of what really happened is neglected.

The media typically goes on a frenzy about things like this. They're hyenas.

He needs to give no statement. No one can demand this of him. Besides, what did he really do wrong? What law did he break? Accuse him of bad taste and poor judgement, nothing else.

Red6


17 posted on 01/14/2005 11:40:25 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I agree. The fact is that he is an idiot and so is whoever handles him. He should have known the uproar that he would cause. That still doesn't justify government leaders demanding apologies and and insisting that he go to Auschwitz. Is he an idiot? yes. Is he antisemitic? I don't know. The world press and governments are wasting their energy and resources with this.


18 posted on 01/14/2005 11:43:47 AM PST by golch1979 ("Captain Sobel, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I agree


19 posted on 01/14/2005 12:02:14 PM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Well here is my 2 cents...I think both Wills and Harry should go visit these sites, not to get a yelling at but to get an education from these people who have been there and know the horrors of WW II. These two royals are no longer "boys" and being the sons of the admired Princess Diana, will not buy them sympathy any longer nor should it.

On the other hand, look who they have to look to for example. Their father is shacking up in the Queen Mum's former home with a woman who made any effort for his marriage to Diana to be successful an effort in futility.
20 posted on 01/14/2005 12:02:54 PM PST by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson