Thanks for the ping, Meek.
Congratulations, all of you.
Buckhead's post is clearly the most famous, but throughout that evening there were pointed comments indicating forgery in the air by many others, most notably TankerKC. There was a second thread running "live" about it that the fellow called something like 'Robert E. Cook, P.E.' posted support for a forgery having occurred, and I think that TankKC was present on that thread at the time, too. I don't know why my ping to him failed here: I must be a bit wrong about his nic, but his comments were in the same very early time frame of the TanKC's first "something wrong with the format" notation to Howlin. And Howlin clearly deserves mention for the key and prompt linking of the memos to the thread for further investigation.
I wish I had been with you all that night, rather than coming in the next day.
Congratulations all, for changing the course of U.S. history, and the election of the President of the U.S., as well as inarguably accelerating the process of the "Changing of the Guard" in the media business.
... P.S.: if anyone is able to get the proper nic for that Robert Cook PE, please ping him for me. He deserves mention with regard to this story, too.
PPS: I agree with Mo1: we are FReepers, not bloggers ...
I think that TankKC was present on that thread at the time, too. I don't know why my ping to him failed here: I must be a bit wrong about his nic .....
< snip >P.S.: if anyone is able to get the proper nic for that Robert Cook PE, please ping him for me. He deserves mention with regard to this story, too.
Post #82, folks.
Robt,
Your presense was requested.
;-)
What was the heading of that second live thread? I was on a live thread that night because that Rather report had upset me. I just knew it couldn't be true, and FR was a comfort - especially to immediately see so many debunkers.
I knew I posted on a live thread that night, and some guy answered me, but I couldn't find my post or his reply on the link to post 47 thread.