Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The President's Purpose Driven Agenda
Magic City Morning Star ^ | Jan 12th, 2005 | Jan Herron

Posted on 01/12/2005 11:57:12 AM PST by VU4G10

The "Purpose" in the President's "Purpose Driven Agenda" is his refusal to fulfill his presidential obligations to Americans. His father began the destruction of America, its sovereignty and borders with NAFTA, and George W. continues the process. Both Bush presidents adhere to the "immigration policy" expressed in Junior's now notorious comment while Texas governor:

"Hell, if they'll cross Big Bend, we want 'em."

Rather than "rest on our laurels," Americans in their golden years must fight for our children and grandchildren's years. How will we answer their query "Why didn't you do something?" What will history say about the Americans whose protests with letters, phone calls and faxes were futile, allowing our country to fade into oblivion?

Time is short and Americans are angry. No more amnesties; no more apathetic "well they're here, might as well accept them and get on with life so what can we do" cop-outs!

Friends, the time for deportations, roundups, arrests, and taking back our country has arrived. Clear language to Mexico must tell them their influence ends at the US border; the past spineless practice of allowing Mexico to dictate US policy must end NOW.

We must demand full enforcement of existing immigration laws, and work for further legislation to protect Americans interest:

  • The "auto-citizenship by birth" policy must end, ending the "anchor babies" born to illegals automatic US citizenship.
  • Local citizens must protest and stop the "sanctuary" policies (Special Order 40 in Los Angeles and Operations Order 1.4 in Phoenix) that hinder their local police.
  • ALL free services to illegals must end.
  • No more Spanish language on our airwaves, billboards, newspapers, and government offices.
  • No more "Press 1 for English, 2 for Spanish and 3 for Hoboken."
  • Without citizens' grassroots protests, the future will clearly present Spanish TV with English captions.
  • Radio and TV broadcasters condemn the continuing invasion of America.
  • Are Congress and this President paying attention?

The April Minuteman Rally at the Arizona border might be worth attending. We must insure that identified illegals are actually captured, detained and deported by the Border Patrol. The politically dictated "catch and release" policy is abominable. Releasing illegals away from public visibility "because we have no detention space" must stop.

Americans need not apologize for protecting our land from illegal alien invaders who violate our laws, stealing our homes, our jobs and our sovereignty.

Our elected officials have refused to do the job, exposing themselves as traitors to the US Constitution and "we the people" they took oath to serve.

"We the people" ARE the government, and elected and appointed officials are our employees. Those employees must be dismissed by the voters who "hired" them, just as any bungling or inept employee in business.

Mexico and its agents have very clearly and blatantly expressed their intention to control America, indicated by quotes from leaders of the "reconquista" (reconquest) movement. Their recently published "how-to comic book" for illegal alien invaders made clear their intent. The blatant "in the gringos' face" publishing on their government website was an open insult to every American.

Despite demands by both citizens and members of Congress, President George W. Bush refuses to comment, remaining "holed up" in the White House and occupied with preparations for his Second Inaugural Gala. Americans should be in the streets in open outrage if he sports a sombrero and speaks Spanish to Americans as he did on the campaign trail.

  1. "We are practicing La Reconquista in California." --1998, Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, California
  2. "I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important - a very important - part of." -- July 23, 1997 in Chicago, Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo.
  3. "We are Mexicans that live in our territories and we are Mexicans that live in other territories. In reality, we are 120 million people that live together and are working together to construct a nation." June 16 2004, Chicago. President of Mexico Vicente Fox.
  4. "Mexico is recovering the territories yielded to the United States by means of migratory tactics," August 15, 2002, WorldNetDaily, Elena Poniatowska, Mexican novelist and lecturer at Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Cornell.

Please inform your friends and relatives of the political consequences if President Bush's deguised amnesty proposal becomes law. George W. Bush plans to grant amnesty to 20 million-plus illegal aliens, knowing they will be future U.S. voters.

These 20 million newly-amnestied illegal aliens will be permitted to bring family members to the US as future American voters. This infinite "chain migration" will be the death of America as we know it.

U.S.-born children of illegal aliens and George W. Bush's "guest workers" will also be future American voters.

The motives of Mexico and its US agents (many of whom are officials of the US government) in lobbying for acceptance of the notoriously fraud-prone Mexican matricula consular, US drivers' licenses, illegal alien amnesty, and publicly-paid benefits (e.g., welfare payments and resident tuition at state universities) should be clear. Mexico doesn't protect the interests of Americans; it doesn't even protect the interests of its own citizens!

Mexico protects the interests of its corrupt and elitist government, intending to install a clone in the United States.

ACTION NEEDED NOW: Call this President and this Congress. Tell them Americans want large "No Vacancy" signs (in English and in Spanish) posted at every US border, lit in 24-hour visible neon lights. We want a 5-year immigration moratorium, beginning NOW!


Email this article
 
 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; bushplan; dhs; illegal; immigrantlist; immigration; jbs; national; security
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2005 11:57:13 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
His father began the destruction of America, its sovereignty and borders with NAFTA

NAFTA was passed by a democrat controlled congress and signed by President Clinton.

2 posted on 01/12/2005 12:00:22 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Don't confuse them with facts.


3 posted on 01/12/2005 12:01:47 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
"The suggestion of a free trade agreement between the United States and Mexico, which arose in 1989 and 1990 in early meetings between President Carlos Salinas de Gortari and President George Bush, also contained no reference to inclusion of labor or environmental issues in the agreement"

http://www.natlaw.com/pubs/usmxlaw/usmjnm10.htm

 

4 posted on 01/12/2005 12:03:10 PM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
The "auto-citizenship by birth" policy must end, ending the "anchor babies" born to illegals automatic US citizenship.

Its not a "policy", its in the Constitution.

No more Spanish language on our airwaves, billboards, newspapers, and government offices

I firmly oppose this. Any business is free to operate in any language they please. By what authority can the Federal Government tell a business they can not advertise in spanish, nor speak spanish? And by the limitation in your post, I guess the use of other languages is just fine. Just no Spanish.

5 posted on 01/12/2005 12:05:11 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

I repeat, NAFTA was passed by a democrat congress and signed into law by President Clinton.


6 posted on 01/12/2005 12:05:52 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

bump


7 posted on 01/12/2005 12:09:37 PM PST by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852; Phantom Lord

NAFTA was passed without any strong democratic support. It was an issue (like trade) where support/opposition fell along class lines. The Black Caucus hated it. The remaining blue collar democrats hated it. The Democratic base hated it. Only with the support of Newt Gingrich and the GOP congressmen did Clinton get it through. Without them it would not have passed.

The New Democrats never gave a damn about blue collar Americans. After all, didn't the New Economy make smokestack industry obsolete ? Couldn't all those workers take HTML and Visual Basic ?

Politically it was a mistake. A 'victory' over your own base doesn't exactly motivate them to turn out for you.


8 posted on 01/12/2005 12:14:29 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Thats right it was signed by a lib and it was the libs who first invited these losers in and now Bush won't do anything to save AMERICA.....get it, NOT mexico but he has a mandate to save AMERICA!! AND UPHOLD THE LAW!!


9 posted on 01/12/2005 12:17:01 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

I have not said that NAFTA was a good deal. I was correcting the poster about who brought it about.


10 posted on 01/12/2005 12:17:01 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord; stopem

Be honest about who brought NAFTA about.

It was Clinton and Newt Gingrich working together to defeat the Democratic base in Congress who got NAFTA passed. It was all GOP congressmen and a few Democrats who supported NAFTA. It was Clinton betraying his own base.


11 posted on 01/12/2005 12:21:07 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

Ahhh did you read my response? I said it was a lib who brought the losers (illegals) in and Bush has a mandate to get the losers out!


12 posted on 01/12/2005 12:22:42 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

And I have no problem with Spanish on our airwaves.

Marianna Fabiani in "El Mundo de Mariana" is my new love.


13 posted on 01/12/2005 12:25:10 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

I've got big problems with the mamby-pamby approach to illegal aliens by Bush, but I fail to see the problem with NAFTA. But then again I'm one of those crazy hardcore free traders.


14 posted on 01/12/2005 12:26:56 PM PST by Zhangliqun (What are intellectuals for but to complexify the obvious?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Done.


15 posted on 01/12/2005 12:39:22 PM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Its not a "policy", its in the Constitution.

Depends on whether you consider illegal aliens 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the US. I do not as they have no official identity, much less have permission to be here.

16 posted on 01/12/2005 12:48:19 PM PST by skeeter (OBL "Americans" won't honor any law that interferes with their pocketbooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Try going to court and having the citizenship of those born here to illegals revoked and see how far you get.

The Constitution makes no mention of the citizenship of the parents. I clearly states that anyone born here is a citizen.

I would support a Constitutional amendment changing the citizenship clause to include that one parent must be a US citizen, including excluding those born here to legal immigrants.

17 posted on 01/12/2005 12:52:46 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Phantom Lord
Try going to court and having the citizenship of those born here to illegals revoked and see how far you get.

I'm not arguing we should.

The Constitution makes no mention of the citizenship of the parents. I clearly states that anyone born here is a citizen.

It clearly states that anyone born in the US AND who is subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Thus the ambiguity.

However, you're right it will take some clarification by Congress to prevent further abuse of this amendment.

19 posted on 01/12/2005 1:16:37 PM PST by skeeter (OBL "Americans" won't honor any law that interferes with their pocketbooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Of course illegals are subject to the jursidiction of the US Government. If they were not, then they would be immune from any type of prosecution as they wouldn't be under the jurisdiction of the US.


20 posted on 01/12/2005 1:19:51 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson