Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2005 1:00:02 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: kattracks

BTTT


2 posted on 01/12/2005 1:01:43 AM PST by spodefly (This message packaged with desiccant. Do not open until ready for use or inspection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Mo1; Miss Marple

I think you might want to see this.


3 posted on 01/12/2005 1:05:38 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

bump


4 posted on 01/12/2005 1:13:07 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; Blurblogger; Mark Felton

Here's the bombshell: it was CBS that broadcast the original Nixonian "White House memo" that was supposed to detail each step of the Ellsberg burglary (he was the leaker of the Pentagon Papers, what "Watergate" was all about in the first place). That memo, on White House letterhead, told the Plumbers everything from when to hit the shrink's office to which filing cabinet to search.

Now lets just pause for a moment and ask ourselves, Who among us today (knowing what we now know about CBS broadcasting forged Bush National Guard memos) would believe that President Nixon told his secretary to type up, on official White House letterhead, a memo detailing how his Plumbers should burglarize that office to obtain Ellsberg's psychiatrist's records?!

Today, after CBS has been busted with forged Bush National Guard memos, that old "White House memo" purportedly from Nixon himself just doesn't pass the smell test.

Who was the star reporter for CBS covering that White House scandal at the time? Dan Rather.

CBS, did you forge Watergate, too?

5 posted on 01/12/2005 1:13:39 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
It amazes me that Rather will escape with no pain.

However, I believe his reputation is forever tarnished over this.
6 posted on 01/12/2005 1:15:43 AM PST by AlGone2001 (You will never know that Jesus is all you need, until Jesus is all you've got-Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

This half-assed whitewash is only going to worsen CBS' credibility hemorrhage.


7 posted on 01/12/2005 1:15:55 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; conspiratoristo; Pontiac; boxerblues; dubyaismypresident; GOP_Lady; DollyCali; ...

(Of possible interest) Pings!


9 posted on 01/12/2005 1:19:03 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Clear evidence of bias. Fair and balanced journalism went out the window. The law of the harvest lesson is unfolding before our eyes. The boomerang of life has landed.


15 posted on 01/12/2005 1:26:58 AM PST by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ImaTexan

ping


16 posted on 01/12/2005 1:28:56 AM PST by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Too bad major corporate sponsors are not pulling or downsizing their advertising on CBS in protest.

Perhaps it's because too many of them are riddled with amoral CEOs such as those heading up CBS.

Birds of a feather........

Leni

17 posted on 01/12/2005 1:29:45 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Roberts' survival and promotion: He knows where other bodies are buried, who put them there....only question is, did he make a verbal threat or just look mean?


21 posted on 01/12/2005 1:50:53 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; All
FYI - interesting thread and project.

CBS 60 Minutes Documents Forgery Facts Project [web site live: analysis and Project report online]

CBS 60 Minutes Documents Forgery Facts Project


22 posted on 01/12/2005 1:57:43 AM PST by windchime (Won't it be great watching President Bush spend political capital?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; hershey
John Roberts is the only person that comes across as sympathetic in the Thornberg report. According to the report, John Roberts conducted the White House interview only because Dan Rather wasn't able to fly to Washington due to "inclement weather". Roberts was given a whopping 45 minutes to prepare for the 11AM interview. Mapes told him that the memo was from Lt. Coloniel Killian's personal file, but didn't mention she had received them from Burkett. Roberts told the panel that he wouldn't have thought the documents were reliable if he knew they were delivered by Burkett.

It's not clear to me whether this portion of the report was toned down in order not to mar Dan Rather's heir apparent - i.e. the John Roberts as a last-minute participant who knew little story is a load of C-BS. Even when the story broke, I thought it was a little odd that glory hound Dan Rather didn't interview the White House himself, even if via satellite.

The inclement weather story sort of checks out. You can check the extent of flight delays at any given airport on any given day on the Bureau of Transportation Statistics' website. Although most NY-DC shuttle flights were pretty much on time on the morning of September 8, U.S. Airways canceled a flight that would have gotten Rather into D.C. in time for the interview. Of course, Rather could have been flying on the company jet or another airline instead. Or CBS could have determined Rather might have been stranded in DC due to weather moving through later in the day.
23 posted on 01/12/2005 2:02:12 AM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

BTTT


24 posted on 01/12/2005 2:30:06 AM PST by lunarbicep (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Not to worry, Dowd, Ivins, Krugman, Jackson, Rooney, etal will be all over this story excoriating CBS and demanding the firing of Dan Rather for CBS's hamhanded and obvious attempt to defame, smear, and unseat a sitting president. I'm sorry folks, I've been taking some strong medication lately, and I'm beginning to hallucinate.


27 posted on 01/12/2005 2:48:24 AM PST by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I think the most ignored aspect of this story is the collusion between the Democratic National Committee and CBS. The DNC ran campaign ads based on this fraud at the same time CBS "reported" it.


28 posted on 01/12/2005 3:01:28 AM PST by MisterRepublican ("I must go. I must be elusive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

"I'm John Kerry, and I'm reporting for duty! G.W Bush did not report for duty---get it? Did I say that right Mary? Wait to you see the political ads my manager Mary Beth Cahill is going to run of me saluting like this. G.W. Bush is in trouble, Dan told me this over the phone."

29 posted on 01/12/2005 3:03:52 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Without the internet and talk radio, Bush would not have been reelected.


31 posted on 01/12/2005 3:10:44 AM PST by tkathy (Ban all religious head garb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

BTTT


34 posted on 01/12/2005 3:15:22 AM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Email to all news organizations:

This absolutely makes me shudder at the deception of CBS News, 60 Minutes and the Democratic Party.
This is terrible, just terrible.
Are they going to get away with trying to throw an election?
This is a low life action and a detraction on all of our Main Stream News Media.
It also shows the depths to which the Democratic Party lowered itself to win an election.
Shame.


36 posted on 01/12/2005 3:21:33 AM PST by OKIEDOC (LL THE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson