Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2005 11:41:41 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: kattracks

The plot thickens.

The Post also reports that Sandy the Burglar hasn't been called before the grand jury yet.


2 posted on 01/11/2005 11:44:19 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; prairiebreeze; onyx; Texasforever; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamsey; mrs tiggywinkle; ...
Former Clinton White House Mr. Fix-It Bruce Lindsey emerged tight-lipped yesterday after testifying before a federal grand jury probing whether top-secret documents were illegally removed from the National Archives

Kind of makes a person go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

3 posted on 01/11/2005 11:48:08 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Nothing is done by mistake...
4 posted on 01/11/2005 11:48:24 PM PST by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I can only imagine the MSM handling of this if Berger were a Republican, alas, a Christian....

we would have irate Democrats demanding a special prosecutor and demanding Senate hearings as well as resignations from anybody and everybody.....

It does show just how entitled the Democrat party feels it is....to be able to walk in, steal documents, hide them in your pants or your socks, and then claim it was just a mistake, oh well....

5 posted on 01/11/2005 11:59:21 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

This is too cool! We are actually doing something about the theft!


9 posted on 01/12/2005 12:10:35 AM PST by ScottM1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I remain skeptical that anything will come of this.
12 posted on 01/12/2005 12:24:30 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Lindsey declined comment on what he told the grand jury.

I guess Brucie decided not to lie about this GJ testimony, as he did once before, and got caught.

16 posted on 01/12/2005 12:37:46 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

If they keep on ignoring/whitewashing crime by the elite long enough, we'll all be able to forget about filing our tax returns etc. There'll be no justification for enforcing laws on anyone.


20 posted on 01/12/2005 12:42:08 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Bruce Lindsey knows where all the bodies are buried.


24 posted on 01/12/2005 12:46:57 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tunehead54
Wake up America!

(bump)


;-)
48 posted on 01/12/2005 2:12:03 AM PST by Tunehead54 (Repeal the 22nd Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Berger removed multiple drafts of the same document about the millineum terrorist threat, a document that proves the Clinton administration should take no credit for preventing a terrorist attack on LAX. It's obvious this was no honest mistake! Sandy Berger was caught stealing, and while I won't hold my breath, there's hope this grand jury just might get him indicted and tried.
54 posted on 01/12/2005 2:33:04 AM PST by YaYa123 (@No Laughable Liar Should Escape Public Ridicule.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

And by the way....God Bless Deborah Orin.


55 posted on 01/12/2005 2:34:11 AM PST by YaYa123 (@No Laughable Liar Should Escape Public Ridicule.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

If those were National Security documents he could face prison for 10 years for each document. Five hundred years is a long time in jail. What these people won't do for Bill and Hilly.


69 posted on 01/12/2005 3:35:49 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Connecting the dots...Judge Napolitano on FNC yesterday that Berger could get 10 years for each doc in his shorts. And I don't think that included charges of destruction of some of these documents.

And I hope the grand jury asks if Berger put anything back...

73 posted on 01/12/2005 4:11:52 AM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

One of these days...the Clintons will be exposed.....


79 posted on 01/12/2005 4:49:54 AM PST by smiley (Watch out Dems! I'm a William F. Buckley Conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

If my memory serves me correctly, didn't sticky fingers Sandy make a couple of cell phone calls (in violation of security rules) to former Clinton counsel Bruce Lindsay from his little cubicle in the National Archives? And yet Lindsay doesn't know anything? Hmmmm, indeed. The Clinton Administration keeps contaminating American public life, even when they're five years out of office.

This reminds me that the Clinton witnesses before the 9/11 Commission were all on point as to what a wonderful job the Clinton Administration had done in fighting terrorism. I am curious as to why no embarrassing memoes such as the ones Sandy stuffed in his socks did not show up at the hearings.


81 posted on 01/12/2005 4:59:00 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Is it known exactly which documents he stole and what was in them?


87 posted on 01/12/2005 5:18:35 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I wish I could share in everybody's confidence on this. The Pink Panther could have sewn up this "investigation" in a f***ing hour! Why is it that here we are 35 years after the fact, still probing away. Reminds me of the endless Clinton investigations that uncovered a lot of "suspicious activity" but nothing prosecutable. Also reminds me of the year+ investigation of that piece of filth in Washington state (McDermott?) who was screwing around with Newt's cell phone calls. Endless investigation leads to.... CRAP! And that boy was caught red-handed as could be. Hope you guys are right, though.


89 posted on 01/12/2005 5:26:40 AM PST by RayStacy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

So are we seeing the beginning of the prosecutions we've all been waiting for, that will continue through 2008?


90 posted on 01/12/2005 5:33:43 AM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Berger was acting on the orders of Bill Clinton, and for one of two reasons (maybe both). Either Clinton didn't want the world to know that he was asleep at the wheel in the fight against terrorism (theft and destruction of certain documents), or he wanted to find out what documents the commission possessed so Berger would be able to give a heads-up to all the members of his administration who were to testify before the commission, i.e. how to spin their answers.


91 posted on 01/12/2005 5:38:16 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson