Skip to comments.
'SOCKS DOCS' JURY GRILLS CLINTON CRONY
New York Post ^
| 1/12/05
| IAN BISHOP and DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 01/11/2005 11:41:41 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-432 next last
1
posted on
01/11/2005 11:41:41 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
The plot thickens.
The Post also reports that Sandy the Burglar hasn't been called before the grand jury yet.
To: kattracks; prairiebreeze; onyx; Texasforever; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamsey; mrs tiggywinkle; ...
Former Clinton White House Mr. Fix-It Bruce Lindsey emerged tight-lipped yesterday after testifying before a federal grand jury probing whether top-secret documents were illegally removed from the National Archives Kind of makes a person go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
3
posted on
01/11/2005 11:48:08 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: kattracks
Nothing is done by mistake...
4
posted on
01/11/2005 11:48:24 PM PST
by
Brian328i
To: kattracks
I can only imagine the MSM handling of this if Berger were a Republican, alas, a Christian....
we would have irate Democrats demanding a special prosecutor and demanding Senate hearings as well as resignations from anybody and everybody.....
It does show just how entitled the Democrat party feels it is....to be able to walk in, steal documents, hide them in your pants or your socks, and then claim it was just a mistake, oh well....
5
posted on
01/11/2005 11:59:21 PM PST
by
cherry
To: Mo1
Sounds as though dear Brucey is in a whole lot of trouble and is NOT going to cover for Mr. Sticky socks.
6
posted on
01/11/2005 11:59:49 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: nopardons
Sandy Pants is up to eye balls in trouble
The real question is ... who will he take down with him ??
7
posted on
01/12/2005 12:01:22 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: Mo1
He is definitely going down,as is Hitlery's little fund raiser cheat. Of the two,my money's on the kid to squeal. Though Sandypants may implicate others too;just not the Clintons.
If Bruce is "stoney faced",he knows there's blood in the water.
8
posted on
01/12/2005 12:06:04 AM PST
by
nopardons
To: kattracks
This is too cool! We are actually doing something about the theft!
To: Mo1
10
posted on
01/12/2005 12:12:54 AM PST
by
onyx
To: nopardons
Though Sandypants may implicate others too;just not the Clintons. I agree ... I'd be surprised to see the Clinton's take a hit
But they are going have a difficult time spinning this all
11
posted on
01/12/2005 12:22:31 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: kattracks
I remain skeptical that anything will come of this.
To: Mo1; cyncooper; Howlin
I was wakened by thunder at 3 AM, and look what I found when I checked FR!
This is turning out to be a VERY interesting week, and its only Wednesday!
To: Miss Marple
This is turning out to be a VERY interesting week, and its only Wednesday! *L* .. I hear ya ... my head is spinning just trying to keep up with it all
14
posted on
01/12/2005 12:34:43 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: Miss Marple
Boy, if they keep this up, they're gonna have to put in traffic control cops near the cannon at Ft. Marcy Park.
15
posted on
01/12/2005 12:36:55 AM PST
by
Diver Dave
(Stay Prayed Up)
To: kattracks
Lindsey declined comment on what he told the grand jury. I guess Brucie decided not to lie about this GJ testimony, as he did once before, and got caught.
To: kattracks
You know, I thought I remembered someone doing that! Sidney Blumenthal did too, didn't he? I seem to remember Blumenthal standing outside the courthouse and making up a whole bunch of stuff and it later turned out that none of it was true.
Lindsey also, if I remember. Spun a bunch of stuff about how the prosecutors were interested in lurid sex details and stuff.
To: Miss Marple
Among the documents Berger lifted were multiple drafts of a report assessing the 2000 millennium threat that is said to conclude that only luck prevented a terrorist attack then. That conflicts with Berger's sworn testimony to the commission he claimed "we thwarted" millennium attacks by being vigilant, not lucky. The commission report makes clear that Berger had a habit of writing candid notes in the margin of memos, sometimes flatly rejecting plans for action. (Berger) nixed a plan to capture Osama bin Laden with one word: "No."
Now did he do that in conference with Clinton? Course, Berger was the national security advisor, so we might assume he counseled Clinton against taking out OBL.
No matter...... 911 happened thanks to these bozos.
I'm convinced that after 911, Berger was compelled to do whatever was necessary to hide, destroy, or pilfer damaging evidence of Berger's incompetence....and/or perhaps his and Clinton's complicity in corrupting US national security.
18
posted on
01/12/2005 12:40:16 AM PST
by
Liz
(Wise men are instructed by reason; lesser men, by experience; the ignorant, by necessity. Cicero)
To: kattracks
Oh, oh, oh! I just remembered something! When Clinton testified before the 9/11 Commision, he wasn't alone! He had two people with him: Berger and Lindsey!
To: kattracks
If they keep on ignoring/whitewashing crime by the elite long enough, we'll all be able to forget about filing our tax returns etc. There'll be no justification for enforcing laws on anyone.
20
posted on
01/12/2005 12:42:08 AM PST
by
Waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-432 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson