Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Independent Panel Review Credits Free Republic
foxnews ^ | 1/10/04 | CBS Investigatory Panel

Posted on 01/10/2005 8:57:57 AM PST by FreeTheHostages

Check out the actual investigatory panel report -- it credits Free Republic (accurately) for first questioning the authenticity of thye documents. The actual investigatory report can be seen

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernardgoldberg; buckhead; cbs; cbsnews; ccrm; coverup; fr; hackworthinvolved; howlin; kctanker; nationalguard; planetofthemapes; rather; ratherbiased; rathergate; ratherreport; seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last
To: FreeTheHostages

It's about time!!!!!


41 posted on 01/10/2005 9:15:55 AM PST by missnry (The truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: js1138

TankerKC pointed out that the memo looked bogus at 8:19pm Eastern Time -- while the broadcast was running! If it was obvious to him, why did it take CBS so long to figure it out? Someone needs to put a monacle on the CBS Eye, because they are seriesly myopic!


42 posted on 01/10/2005 9:16:11 AM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

My understanding is that this wasn't a CBS report, per se, but the report of an independent panel. Of course, CBS did can the four execs, but Dan Rather remains unscathed.


43 posted on 01/10/2005 9:16:22 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

CBS took a broadside hit on this one ..Nice work folks...
OK WHO"S NEXT ???? The UN I say ...weeeeeeeeeeeoooooooo


44 posted on 01/10/2005 9:16:28 AM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ironclad
I don't think the panel's conclusion that there was no political agenda at See-BS is credible....

I think they were trying to get around this by citing the "myopic zeal" (which, apparently, is not bias but rather a rush to get a story onto the news... might be credible if that approach also was applied to stories negative to Democrats). In my mind, "myopic zeal" should go right up there with "fake but accurate" in the panetheon of liberal weasel wording.

45 posted on 01/10/2005 9:17:31 AM PST by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...

46 posted on 01/10/2005 9:17:33 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents; .cnI redruM

Confirming what My2Cents says. Dick Thornburgh, Attorney General under Bush I, was on the panel. He's a guy widely respected for his integrity by both parties.


47 posted on 01/10/2005 9:17:49 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
I've always loved the men in pajamas comment. First of all, it's totally sexist!

Not really. Everyone knows that Freeper women always Freep nekkid. It's a rule of the site.

48 posted on 01/10/2005 9:18:28 AM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GraceCoolidge

"In my mind, "myopic zeal" should go right up there with "fake but accurate" in the panetheon of liberal weasel wording."

Well said.


49 posted on 01/10/2005 9:18:35 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages

Did you really expect to see Dapper Dan, The Slander Man go for a frog march?


50 posted on 01/10/2005 9:18:49 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Memo to John F. Kerry - We don't send losers to rebuild Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages

Here's to you, Messrs. Robinson.


51 posted on 01/10/2005 9:18:57 AM PST by Beckwith (John, you said I was going to be the First Lady. As of now, you're on the couch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

That's really wierd, and not especially flattering.


52 posted on 01/10/2005 9:20:08 AM PST by Petronski (I'm *not* always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

LOL. "Everyone knows" -- certainly not the CBS news guys who said "men in pajamas."

But hush, now they know -- I'm certain an unverified expose is coming our way quickly!


53 posted on 01/10/2005 9:20:08 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: hineybona

After watching the People's Choice Awards last night I see CBS is still up to the same old shenaningans...just different venue.


54 posted on 01/10/2005 9:20:36 AM PST by Ramstein75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

No.

But on the other hand there's something to be said for a slow, painful, public death (of reputation and career).

And that continues to occur, day-by-day. He doesn't have the judgment to realize it's over. It's soooo over. Lots of people can't look at his face without thinking of his impassioned defense of those documents for the better part of two weeks after every 12-year old had figured this out.


55 posted on 01/10/2005 9:21:50 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People
WHERE IS THE APOLOGY?

And the retraction?

56 posted on 01/10/2005 9:21:58 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Buckhead never claimed sole credit.

I know he didn't, but most everyone, on this site and elsewhere, attribute him to breaking the story. He did not.

When the story broke, I heard his name mentioned on talk shows.

57 posted on 01/10/2005 9:22:11 AM PST by Jenya (I'm a newbie here, but not to life. Don't even think of imposing your seniority on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I suspect they will not admit the documents a fake is because they know lawsuits are coming down the pike. Res ipsi lociture


58 posted on 01/10/2005 9:22:36 AM PST by Texas Songwriter (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
If it was obvious to him...

I was pretty active on those threads during the first 24 hours. What is obvious to one person isn't obvious to another person who lacks direct experience with the kind of document involved.

I argued with Buckhead and others during that 24 hours and advised caution. That was because I edited a small magazine in the early 1970s that was typeset with an IBM Composer. I had direct knowledge that proportional fonts were available. It was pretty clear to everyone that a Composer was not an office typewriter, but it still required font experts to nail the coffin.

59 posted on 01/10/2005 9:23:05 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ramstein75

They suck in plain English . Frauds the lot of them . Socialist morons. Peoples choice awards? who cares ..Michael who ? He's on his way to the ash heap of history . A no body if ever there was one .


60 posted on 01/10/2005 9:24:14 AM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-298 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson