Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sanford's starting to create a buzz!

One complaint I have is that all the Sanford for President articles trash Bush too much. I have my beefs with Dubya, but we have to be careful-a lot of Bush voters would be turned off if Sanford's campaign starts up as a "Bush sucks I am better" campaign-which means we lose and Hillary wins.

1 posted on 01/10/2005 8:14:18 AM PST by RockinRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dubyaismypresident; jmc813; Jaysun; AVNevis; KevinDavis; traviskicks; gab1279; Ogie Oglethorpe; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 01/10/2005 8:15:57 AM PST by RockinRight (Let's start now-Mark Sanford for President in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pratherdc

You want on my Sanford ping list?


3 posted on 01/10/2005 8:17:47 AM PST by RockinRight (Let's start now-Mark Sanford for President in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Jimmy Carter, did you say?


4 posted on 01/10/2005 8:18:56 AM PST by PeterFinn (Liberals are a greater threat to the USA than are Islamofascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Bush campaigned on conservative issues for his second term, as opposed to the centrist issues he went for the first time around.

What's worrying me about 2008 is that a few high-profile conservatives are bashing the War on Terror--I'm thinking of Newt Gingrich. It should be possible for these elected officials to scrounge up the support for both restricted government and kicking the crap out of Islamofascists. If not, we're in trouble.


5 posted on 01/10/2005 8:20:16 AM PST by Terpfen (Gore/Sharpton '08: it's Al-right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Yeah, but how does he look in a cowboy hat clearing brush?


8 posted on 01/10/2005 8:24:58 AM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Bush hasn't even been inaugurated second time around, and people are already lining up for the next election.


10 posted on 01/10/2005 8:30:25 AM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

One complaint I have is that all the Sanford for President articles trash Bush too much.

--

He calls it like it is. Sure, I voted and volunteered for Bush, but I don't agree with a lot of what he's done. I'd much rather have a true economic conservative in D.C.


12 posted on 01/10/2005 8:33:22 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/terrorism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
"we have to be careful-a lot of Bush voters would be turned off if Sanford's campaign starts up as a "Bush sucks I am better" campaign-which means we lose...."

You are quite right about that. President Bush is, it should be obvious, quite popular with the people. It isn't necessary to denigrate what the President has accomplished. There is still much more to be done and most recognize that. If Sanford take the base that has been created and builds on that, he has a good chance at success. To try to damage the President tends to have some blow-back.

16 posted on 01/10/2005 8:38:10 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Yeah, its kind of silly for Sanford to run against Bush in 2008.

But it stands to reason he may be running against Jeb.


17 posted on 01/10/2005 8:39:55 AM PST by PeterFinn (Liberals are a greater threat to the USA than are Islamofascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

One remarkable thing about Sanford and another potential candidate, Gov Tim Pawlenty, is that they are younger (though not by much) than I am! Makes me feel a little old. Hard to believe as early as 2009 we could have a president born after I was. But it would be good to see some new blood in the GOP. Sen George Allen is in his early 50s but he is youthful. And all 3 of these guys are preferable to McCain, IMO.


20 posted on 01/10/2005 8:59:24 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Sanford's biggest challenge would be to explain some of his votes on issues, like when he voted against the creation of a South Carolina Military Preparedness and Enhancement Commission.

The answer is simple-they already do what that commission was to do, and Mark doesn't like adding more bureacracy. But he has to come up with the best way to convey this message.

He can do it.


25 posted on 01/10/2005 9:44:19 AM PST by RockinRight (Sanford for President in '08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Iowan for Sanford!!!


26 posted on 01/10/2005 12:17:59 PM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

The Darkhorse 2008 Candidate: ID Gov and former Senator Dirk Kempthorne.


27 posted on 01/10/2005 12:47:34 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Oh man, I'm not sure if a South Carolina Republican is the guy for the job - but then I don't know for sure. What about Bill Frist?


29 posted on 01/10/2005 12:55:49 PM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson