Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro

Ah, an interesting and intriguing comparison here. It is a fact that Kennedy's election was badly tainted, and smacked of Maffia influence in some States. I'll point a few significative differences, though, like :

- Kennedy did not ask Khrouchtchev (or Mac Millan or de Gaulle) to intervene either diplomatically or militarily to ensure his victory.

- I don't remember the disgruntled voters sieging government buildings (or Democratic headquarters) and appealing to the world's public opinion. In fact, Nixon himself conceded victory to Kennedy.

- I don't remember Nixon being poisoned either.


12 posted on 01/06/2005 9:17:55 AM PST by Atlantic Friend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Atlantic Friend
Nixon wasn't poisoned - but JFK's head was blown away though as was his brother's and as was MLK and a potential vote swing Dixiecrat was crippled. America sure has a lot of lone nut gunmen.

Also, why do you not assume The "Russian" side poisoned Yushchenko? The type of poison used makes it more likely the plotters wanted the man to be alive and martyred and too sock to rule and thus leaving somene else in charge, a likely scenario.

14 posted on 01/06/2005 9:24:17 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson