To: Atlantic Friend
Nixon wasn't poisoned - but JFK's head was blown away though as was his brother's and as was MLK and a potential vote swing Dixiecrat was crippled. America sure has a lot of lone nut gunmen.
Also, why do you not assume The "Russian" side poisoned Yushchenko? The type of poison used makes it more likely the plotters wanted the man to be alive and martyred and too sock to rule and thus leaving somene else in charge, a likely scenario.
14 posted on
01/06/2005 9:24:17 AM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Destro
"Also, why do you not assume The "Russian" side poisoned Yushchenko?"
Because they had the most to gain from it, and because they also rigged the precedent election (something Mr Lind acknowledges), so it's not as if we're talking about nice guys here.
"The type of poison used makes it more likely the plotters wanted the man to be alive and martyred and too sock to rule and thus leaving somene else in charge, a likely scenario."
A possible scenario, yes. A likely scenario, no, because Occam's razor gets in the way.
To: Destro
Also, why do you not assume The "Russian" side poisoned Yushchenko? I do not assume too. For the same reason why I do not assume that Western "poisoned" Yushchenko to make him look like a unjustly persecuted man. Assume break down into "ass you and me".
BTW, this "dioxin poisoning" is an obvious hoax, despite that most of Western media and people believe it. For a LONG time the doctors COULD NOT DETECT this "dioxin" in his body despite the extremely high levels found LATER.
56 posted on
01/07/2005 5:08:14 AM PST by
A. Pole
(Hash Bimbo: "Low wage is good for you!".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson