Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Republican leaders always support the troops. It's that simple. I wish we could compartmentalize this thread about Kosovo.

But that's the whole point. I wasn't referring to a situation in which Republican leaders "supported the troops" in Kosovo -- I'm talking about people like Richard Perle and William Kristol openly supporting U.S. military intervention in a conflict in the former Yugoslavia in which no compelling U.S. interest was at stake. Imagine that: Clinton, in "wagging the dog" in Kosovo, enjoyed the outright support of the same people who have been the strongest cheerleaders for the Iraq war.

In addition to this, a disturbing number of these "neo-conservatives" (including both of the men I mentioned above) belong to a group called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). This organization has made a name for itself in recent months for -- now get ready for this -- criticizing the Putin government for its heavy-handed methods of dealing with Chechen terrorists.

So there we have it. The same people who were such strong supporters of the war in Iraq were/are also: 1) supporters U.S. military intervention in the Balkans on behalf of a radical Muslim element in Kosovo, and 2) critics of a Russian government that is dealing with its own problems with terrorism.

You can sit there and play stupid/naive all you want, but there is a clear inconsistency in these positions that should make any reasonably intelligent person stand up and take note.

"War on terror," my @ss.

10 posted on 01/06/2005 3:01:34 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If whiskey was his mistress, his true love was the West . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Hmm. I presume you think that anyone who doesn't see it the way you do, is, by your definition, not "reasonably intelligent"?

That is quite an egotistical statement. I assume you were being rhetorical.


11 posted on 01/06/2005 3:24:15 AM PST by rlmorel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Regarding Kristol: what US military action has he opposed during the war? I'd be surprised if he ever opposed any war, except perhaps after the fact. That is standard GOP, support the troops and support what they are told to do.

"In addition to this, a disturbing number of these "neo-conservatives" (including both of the men I mentioned above) belong to a group called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). This organization has made a name for itself in recent months for -- now get ready for this -- criticizing the Putin government for its heavy-handed methods of dealing with Chechen terrorists."

I support the war against the Chechans. But back before watching NET [no longer around], I opposed the war against the Chechans. I had the wrong news sources. Does that make me a neo-nazi--- er, uh... neo-con man?

"You can sit there and play stupid/naive all you want, but there is a clear inconsistency in these positions that should make any reasonably intelligent person stand up and take note."

Oh? I'm playing stupid? Imagine if I unstrapped the other half of my brain. [To borrow a phrase from Rush]

["War on terror," my @ss.]

We destroyed a regime that called its nation to celebrate 9-11. What are you? A defense attorney for Saddam Insane? Babyface Nelson and Al Capone could have used friends like you. Good grief.


13 posted on 01/07/2005 1:27:33 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The Four Law Breakers: Senators Rockefeller, Durbin, Carl Levin, Ron Wyden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson