Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is this internet prodigy about to knock Microsoft off its pedestal? Bill Gates' nightmare? FIREFOX
Times Online ^ | 01.04.05

Posted on 01/04/2005 4:26:26 PM PST by Coleus

alt
alt
Modest pioneer: Blake Ross. At 7, he was a computer game addict. At 17, he made the breakthrough that created Firefox. At 19, he is a student of computer science (DAVID ADAME)
alt

Is this internet prodigy about to knock Microsoft off its pedestal?

A Miami teenager has created a free web browser that has been called Bill Gates's worst nightmare
 

A MIAMI teenager is basking in the glory of helping to create a new internet browser at 17 that is now challenging the grip of Microsoft, which once held a virtual monopoly on web surfing.

Computer analysts say that Blake Ross’s browser, Firefox, is a faster, more versatile program that also offers better protection from viruses and unwanted advertising.

Not only that, the system is offered free over the internet and its codes and technology are all accessible as an “open source” programme. Firefox has already been downloaded by an estimated 15 million users since its launch in November, making it the world’s second-most-popular browser.

Industry experts have dubbed the new software “Microsoft’s worst nightmare”, according to the technology magazine Business 2.0. It hailed Mr Ross, now 19, as a software prodigy. He is also a talented pianist and “an unbelievable creative writer”, according to his mother, Ross. “Anything he does, he does well,” she said.

As a seven-year-old Mr Ross became hooked on the popular computer game SimCity, designing and budgeting his own virtual city. By 10, he had created his own website. He later created his own computer applications and online text games.Soon he was reporting computer software flaws to manufacturers online.

At 14 he was offered an internship at Netscape in Silicon Valley. His mother drove him out to California for three summers in succession.

At Netscape, Mr Ross was introduced to the Mozilla Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation that promotes “choice and innovation on the web”.

Mozilla was already trying to develop an open-source alternative browser to Microsoft’s Explorer, which many analysts felt had grown clumsy and outdated. Mr Ross and his friend David Hyatt began working on a small, user-focused browser. What began as an experimental side-project turned into Firefox.

Mr Ross is quick to point out that he was one of a large team at Mozilla who worked on the project for five years. “It’s a big volunteer effort,” he said. In fact, the pair left before the work was completed, but Mozilla credits them with making the breakthrough. After he left to go to university, Mr Ross continued to be a “significant contributor”, according to Mozilla.

The task involved throwing out all the old codes and rewriting the entire system so it would support all websites on the internet. While Firefox still has a long way to go to rival Microsoft, it seems to be catching on. Firefox has received dazzling reviews from industry analysts. Recently some 10,000 Firefox fans raised $250,000 (£131,000) to take out a two-page advertisement in The New York Times. It is not just in dividual users who are taking interest. In December, the information technology department at Pennsylvania State University sent a note to college deans recommending that the entire 100,000-strong staff, faculty and student body switch to Firefox.

Mr Ross, now a student at Stanford University studying computer science, is taking it all in his stride. As a volunteer on an open-source product, there was no financial reward.

Microsoft professes to be unfazed. Windows executive Gary Schare said: “We’re seeing the natural ebb and flow of a competitive marketplace with new products being introduced. It’s not surprising to see curious early adopters checking them out.”

Not content with making a huge dent in Microsoft’s browser share, Mozilla, the foundation behind Firefox, is also going after Microsoft’s Outlook and other e-mail packages.

Called Thunderbird 1.0, the package works on Windows, Macintosh and Linux and has been praised by the industry and press for finally offering a challenge to Microsoft’s dominance in the e-mail arena.

The software provides a number of features which other packages are struggling to offer. Key features include e-mail junk filters that analyse and sort incoming mail and greater security elements.

Page 1 || Page 2 || Page 3


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: billgates; firefox; internetexploiter; lowqualitycrap; microsoft; microsoftwindows; webbrowsers; windows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last
To: Coleus
Blake? That's a first name for someone?

Yes and no: Blake Edwards, born William Blake McEdwards.

41 posted on 01/04/2005 4:59:58 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump


42 posted on 01/04/2005 5:00:05 PM PST by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
but users have been trained to expect their computers to behave in a certain...Microsofty way.

and there is the genius of Gates.

He had the vision to see what was to come, got there first,made,bought,stoled,depending on ones point of view,a great product,and now he owns the market.

43 posted on 01/04/2005 5:02:51 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog

Free products like Firefox keeps Interent Explorer free.

It's good to have a big American software corporation to compete against the rest of the world. If Microsoft were owned by anyone else and had as huge a monopoly, then I would want and demand more competition. If other countries could hold a monopoly over anyone else, with like let's say oil, then they would make others pay through the nose. I guess that's how OPEC treats Europe. Thus, it's good to have an American Microsoft. Knowing that it's good and important to have a big American Corporation that exerts so much influence, I can understand more and more why anti-Americans (like American ultra-leftists) absolutely hate Microsoft even though Bill Gates is a solidly left-of-center guy in politics.


44 posted on 01/04/2005 5:03:47 PM PST by SaltyJoe ("Social Justice" begins with the unborn child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Reading threads from many freepers I see a trend where they are switching to Firefox.

I switched to Firefox a few weeks ago on the advice of several Freepers. Smartest Web move I've ever done. I LOVE Firefox.

45 posted on 01/04/2005 5:05:50 PM PST by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Thunderbird 1.0 is better than Outlook, IMO.

It is similar to Firefox relative to IE - faster, smaller, and equally functional for many users.
46 posted on 01/04/2005 5:07:14 PM PST by clyde asbury (As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Maigret
Not only is it troublefree so far, my spyware shows it has decreased spyware being picked up by more than 90%.

I just did a Spyware Sweep and it showed only 6 spywares for a period of over a week. Before Firefox I would have had at least 2 dozen spywares in that same timeframe.

47 posted on 01/04/2005 5:07:39 PM PST by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I disagree, Microsoft has accumulated a lot of power and influence over what the industry does due to its overwhelming majority in the browser market. Microsoft sets the tone.

If they drop below 50%, then they lose a lot of that. And thats worth a lot.

Nonsense. Content is all that matters - not the container for the content.

Netscape controlled the browsers "market" and at one time Netscape had a better product. Microsoft started from the position of 0% and cleaned Netscape's clock but good.

Microsoft makes its money on operating systems, development environments, and services to provide web content (as well as office software). If everybody was using FireFox, Microsoft will make the same amount of money.

Content is king, not the thing that displays the content.

Let's review:

Amount Microsoft made off of IE last year: $0,000.00

Amount FireFox dude will make if every human downloads a copy of FireFox: $0,000.00

48 posted on 01/04/2005 5:07:49 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

Do you elect to open it or to save it to your computer?


49 posted on 01/04/2005 5:08:26 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Blake? That's a first name for someone?

It was 17 years ago.




But I digress...

Just last Friday I spent the evening cleaning spyware and other junk out of a friend's computer. (Internet Exploder was lifting its skirt for anyone and anything on the Internet.) Once I was done, I installed Firefox and threatened bodily harm if they use the 'net slut again.

50 posted on 01/04/2005 5:10:02 PM PST by Redcloak ("FOUR MORE BEERS! FOUR MORE BEERS! FOUR MORE BEERS!" -Teresa Heinz Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
"Some clown actually thinks Bill Gates is losing sleep over this?"

Controlling the browser gives Microsoft an edge when it comes to setting standards. They would like nothing better than to have everyone creating web pages with their software that can only be loaded with their software. Once they have the content encoded in their proprietary formats (such as they do with Word and Excel), every couple of years they turn over a ton of $$ by forcing everyone to upgrade. This is done by giving corporate clients a price break if they agree to buy upgrades when they are available. The upgraded software fights like hell to save everything in the new format. Older software can't read the new format, so now another wave of upgrades occur because people can't read the documents being sent to them. They control all of this, so they don't have to provide versions of their software for other platforms, like Linux. Attempts to create clones are met with legal action over their proprietary and secret formats. All of this hinges on controlling the format in which information is encoded, and MSIE is an important part of that.
51 posted on 01/04/2005 5:11:23 PM PST by beef ("Blessed are the geeks, for they shall inherit the earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I'd like to try firefox but I don't want two browsers as I like a "lean" computer

Browsers are pretty "lite" applications - good for it, FireFox will not make your computer overweight (it is will inherit all your links from IE - now that is cool). Truth is for general Internet browsing or if you venture into the outer limits of the net you are far better off using FireFox because it is not currently targeted by the cretins that write spyware, hijackers, and viruses

52 posted on 01/04/2005 5:13:16 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Last Visible Dog
Nonsense. Content is all that matters - not the container for the content.

We'll see if Microsoft lets IE go into that good night without any further fight. They should if they get nothing out of it being dominant. If you are right, and its worthless to have the dominant browser, then they will probably just let Firefox have its way.

I doubt that.
53 posted on 01/04/2005 5:15:48 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: beef
All of this hinges on controlling the format in which information is encoded, and MSIE is an important part of that.

Not according to many here. To many here, having THE dominant internet browser is worth absolutely nothing....say it again....absolutely nothing.
54 posted on 01/04/2005 5:17:17 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The amount of effort, time and expense Microsoft went through to create, debug and embed Internet explorer into Windows, suggest that there was a reason why it was created.

And that reason is CONTENT. CONTENT - CONTENT - CONTENT.

Microsoft did not clean Netscape's clock just for the fun of it. Microsoft saw the big picture. The browser needed to be expanded so it could provide more CONTENT! Microsoft makes it money off the tools to create and provide content. For FireFox to make a real dent in the browsers "market" - it will have to support all the Content. Microsoft makes its money off of the tools to create and provide content. Microsoft will make the same amount of money if everybody used FireFox.

You are not employed by Microsoft are you?

Nope. I have just been in the soft engineering industry for over 25 years. I have learned to tell the difference between reality and foo foo dust.

If it makes no sense for a student to go to all that trouble for zero profit, why would a publicly held company do it?

CONTENT - CONTENT - CONTENT!!!!!!!

Microsoft makes its money off of tools to create and deliver content. They make no money off of the device that displays the content.

55 posted on 01/04/2005 5:23:24 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw; groanup
I skimmed through the article. Where did you get Firefox? How much did it cost? I'm about sick of Windows.

He sounded like he was willing to pay for it. You probably could have sold him that link for $25.00 or more.

I wonder if he is interested in an office productivity suite? Maybe I can sell him a link to download OpenOffice.

56 posted on 01/04/2005 5:24:33 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
He had the vision to see what was to come, got there first,made,bought,stoled,depending on ones point of view,a great product,and now he owns the market.

True. And you are not going to compete with him just by making your operating system behave the opposite of his. People have come to expect their computers to operate the way he laid down. If you try to be non-Microsoft for the sake of being non-Microsoft, you users will get frustrated. Even if your idea of how it should work is better, its still frustrating as hell for the average non-geek user.

Put your scroll bar on the opposite side of applications and have it work slightly different? It will drive people nuts, or at least drive off many potential adopters. Its good to do things better, but familiar is better to most.

I hope Linux can compete in the home market, because competition is good. But Linux will really have to go on a major user-friendliness kick, and de-geekify a bit, to ever have a real shot.
57 posted on 01/04/2005 5:25:19 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
[Gates] owns the market.

Economic history is filled with tales of businesses that "owned the market," "had a lock on the market," or in some other way had it made.

The same was said about A & P grocery stores years ago. Sears is about one-fifth the size of Wal-Mart today.

Gates is personally set for life, yes. Microsoft itself has nowhere to go but down.
58 posted on 01/04/2005 5:25:31 PM PST by clyde asbury (As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: silent_jonny
But Windows and IE are almost synonymous.

Not at all. IE comes with Windows and runs under Windows.

Is door handle synonymous with house?

59 posted on 01/04/2005 5:26:29 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: politicalwit
It's hard to pinpoint the exact reason but I keep returning to IE.

Probably the convinience of tabbed browsing that bothers you. Microsoft has even admitted that some of their employees use Mozilla.

60 posted on 01/04/2005 5:26:52 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson