Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerACLUmember
"I don't get it. I only want to deal with women who ARE intelligent. However it appears that they are simply not getting married."

This is big problem if we going to continue to have a civilization in the future. Intelligent women not having kids = the population gets less intelligent. The only eugenic factor today is the availability of cheap abortion to low-intelligence single mothers. Any yet most conservatives want to do a way with abortion altogeter. Go figure.

8 posted on 01/02/2005 2:34:40 PM PST by Truthsayer20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Truthsayer20

Yes abort the babies we think are going to be stupid eh?


12 posted on 01/02/2005 2:36:36 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20; cyborg

Our society needs to allow/encourage intelligent women to be more fertile. Europe is a demographic nightmare are the educated women simply have no/few children, far less than is necessary to keep the population stable. The USA is slightly better, but still very disturbed in the message we give young, intelligent women.


22 posted on 01/02/2005 2:40:36 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20

What makes you think conservatives are into eugenics? That's a socialist position par excellence: in a managed society, there will be no "imperfect" people.

Hope you're perfect, or maybe you won't have a chance when Hillary takes over. On the other hand, most of us conservatives would let you hang around.


25 posted on 01/02/2005 2:42:22 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20
While it may seem be true, as a whole, libs are killing their own, I cannot in good faith allow a child to be murdered because of the disposition on his/her mother/father. I'm far more conservative than my mother and some kids are far more left than their conservative parents.

I cannot condemn any innocent baby to death. The ends don't justify the means.

26 posted on 01/02/2005 2:42:58 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (We shall overcome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20

Abortion is wrong no matter what socio economic class opts for it.
Its not that men don't want to marry smart women.Its that they don't want to marry smart ASSED women who try to transfer their aggression in the world of work to the domicile.


37 posted on 01/02/2005 2:47:28 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20

No, it's a matter of intelligent kids being more expensive to raise. As soon as kids go from "asset" to "liability" the birthrates drop. Welfare queens have lots of kids because the kids are still assets... more government money.

I guarantee that if you repeal child labor laws, you'll see the birthrate rise quite a bit.


43 posted on 01/02/2005 2:49:11 PM PST by Nataku X (There are no converts in Islam... only hostages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20
The only eugenic factor today is the availability of cheap abortion to low-intelligence single mothers.

More than offset, many times over in fact, by the sheer quantity of doomed kids those same dim single moms and their thuggee boyfriends keep generating.

Trying to improve the dysgenic tendency of the underclass with abortion is not only morally repulsive, it's also practically infeasible. Like trying to bail out a boat with a thimble without plugging the hole in the bilges first.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

108 posted on 01/02/2005 3:19:29 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (Opening Soon: New, Improved Tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20

Wow. Made it all the way to post #8 before abortion was brought up.

Must be a new record. Usually it is post #2.


123 posted on 01/02/2005 3:29:14 PM PST by MonroeDNA (“I feel more comfortable with Soviet intellectuals than I do with American businessmen.” --Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20

Abortion also strikes heavily among affluent intelligent women
who do not wish to interrupt their carêrs or abstain from trivial fun-sex stuff.


153 posted on 01/02/2005 3:42:16 PM PST by ThanhPhero ( Nguoi hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Truthsayer20
This is big problem if we going to continue to have a civilization in the future. Intelligent women not having kids = the population gets less intelligent.

I think it is the Farelly Brothers or Mike Judge who were developing a comedy script (it was titled, "3001") about a guy who is preserved via some sort of futuristic scientific technology and he is reawakened in the year 3001.

Well, IFRC, what has happened in the intervening years is that the population has been dumbed down. This is because the more responsible, educated, career oriented couples have been careful to only have the kids that they can afford to raise. They wait longer and bear fewer. The only ones who have been reproducing in volume are the irresponsible dumbasses, basically.

Our hero was considered to be expendable when he is put in his deep freeze (or whatever it is they did to him) because he was a big dodo. Unfortunately, in 3001, this guy is intelligent by comparison to the rest of the population, that's how far things went downhill. I only read a little of it and relied upon my coworker's explanation of the premise because I don't like to read this stuff in advance. I want to be surprised when I see the film.

336 posted on 01/02/2005 7:15:19 PM PST by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson