Posted on 12/31/2004 10:22:58 AM PST by DaiHuy
Check out this outrage! I wonder if the bloggers are all over it yet? I'm going to check later this afternoon when I get back on the computer.
Thank you.
That's what you can expect when democrats are in control. *sigh*
That would be treating the homeless voters differently than regular voters.
Do these people really exist? Some proof of Life must be recorder if no address. Treated differently because they are outside of the "Standard Requirements", and your point is?
Thank you.
BTTT for neighboring Washingtonians.
Bump for revote or complete recount, not just the demo controlled areas.
Yeah, yeah, so I've been told...
;-)
Pity I can't go back and fix it, but you guys seem to be getting along OK.
Michelle Malkin mentions it today. It's also been commented on by PowerLine and PoliPundit during the last few weeks.
We all owe Stefan Sharkansky of http://soundpolitics.com/ a debt of gratitude.
Out of sheer laziness, I lifted this from another site:
In the 1960 presidential race Richard M. Nixon lost by a hair to John F. Kennedy.
Two states with razor-thin margins for Kennedy could have swung the election to Nixon: Kennedy carried Texas by only 46,000 votes, and he carried Illinos by a mere 9,000 votes.
Illinois was then, and is now, dominated by Democratic machine politicians the kings of which are the Daley family of Chicago fame.
Democratic Campaign Chair, William Daley, is the son of the late Chicago Mayor Richard J. Daley who was instrumental in "stealing" the 1960 election from Nixon. Bill Daley is also brother to the current Chicago Mayor, Richard Daley, Jr.
In the aftermath of 1960 virtual non-election, investigators were alarmed by the fact that on election eve the Republicans were leading in Illinois but Daleys operatives were withholding the results of a large number of precincts for some worrisome reason.
Then, when Kennedy was just four electoral votes shy of winning the presidency, all of the missing Chicago precincts mysteriously reported at the same time, turning the tide in favor of Kennedy.
There were 68 million votes cast in the 1960 election. The margin between the Republicans and the Democrats (Nixon and Kennedy) was a trifling 113,000 (less than 2/10 of one percent!) in favor of Kennedy.
A subsequent investigation of vote fraud in Illinois and Texas revealed the following:
Fannin County, Texas had only 4,895 registered voters. BUT 6,138 votes were cast, 75% of which went to Kennedy.
Angelina County, Texas: In one precinct, only 86 people voted yet the final tally was 147 for Kennedy, 24 for Nixon.
But Texas refused to conduct a recount. The Texas Election Board consisted entirely of Democrats, and the Board certified John Kennedy the winner in Texas.
Illinois: News reporters witnessed so much voter fraud by the Democrats that the Chicago Tribune stated "the election of November 8 was characterized by such gross and palpable fraud as to justify the conclusion that [Nixon] was deprived of victory." (As quoted by the Washington Post.)
The Republican National Committee filed a lawsuit challenging the Chicago results. Not coincidentally, the lawsuit was assigned to the courtroom of a judge known to be friendly to Daley and the Democratic party, Circuit Court Judge Thomas Kluczynski. After predictably dismissing the Republican suit, Kluczynski was rewarded by "President" John F. Kennedy with an appointment to the federal bench.
Earl Mazo was a reporter for the New York Herald Tribune in 1960. He investigated charges of Chicago voter fraud in the 1960 Kennedy / Nixon elections. Mazo found a cemetary in one Chicago precinct where the names on the head stones were registered voters who had actually voted!
Reporter Mazo also visited the Chicago address where 56 Kennedy voters listed their address. What he found was an abandoned, demolished house.
After numerous Democratic judges dismissed Republican charges of voter fraud, Kennedy was inaugurated.
Following Kennedys inauguration, the U.S. Department of Justice performed an inconclusive investigation into the accumulated evidence of voter fraud. The head of the DOJ was none other than U.S. Attorney General Bobby Kennedy, brother of you-know-who.
this needs to go before the DOJ-there are major civil rights violations if indeed there are fraudulent, manufactured votes...the dilution of legitimate votes is a clear CR issue...anybody see Al Sharpton or the Revvvvv Jesse out in force over this????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.