Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
Hillary couldn't get in the White House if she announced she was a lesbian having an menage a trois with Monica and Oprah. Freepers need to get it: no one has even fathomed the term "negative vote" until they see Hillary get a nomination nationally.

I've seen two posters already write they are inclined to vote for Hillary.

Either they are lonely single men, DU trolls, or just plain crazy.

373 posted on 12/31/2004 2:02:18 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981; Flux Capacitor; goldstategop; LS

Gee, that's funny.

I thought the Clintons held the White House for eight years in the 90's. So obviously a lot of Americans have a very high opinion of them.

You really should read Flux Capacitor's post. He spelled it out quite nicely. Because they start with New York and California, the Dems have a massive structural electoral advantage (if either of these states were competitive imagine how much money would have had to be spent in those media markets). Bush spent much time in October in New Jersey and Pennsylvannia and got neither. So given a strong candidate, and Hillary would be a strong candidate, it would be fairly easy to pick up Colorado or Arizona. Or maybe even Louisiana.


383 posted on 12/31/2004 2:10:30 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson