Gee, that's funny.
I thought the Clintons held the White House for eight years in the 90's. So obviously a lot of Americans have a very high opinion of them.
You really should read Flux Capacitor's post. He spelled it out quite nicely. Because they start with New York and California, the Dems have a massive structural electoral advantage (if either of these states were competitive imagine how much money would have had to be spent in those media markets). Bush spent much time in October in New Jersey and Pennsylvannia and got neither. So given a strong candidate, and Hillary would be a strong candidate, it would be fairly easy to pick up Colorado or Arizona. Or maybe even Louisiana.
Huh and the Pubs took control and held the House and Senate in 94, even after the best efforts of the MSM, and gained and bucked electoral history in 02 and 04.
Things must be pretty dismal in hillary's campaign basement for you to be that desparate, rhetorically, IMO.