Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981; Flux Capacitor; goldstategop; LS

Gee, that's funny.

I thought the Clintons held the White House for eight years in the 90's. So obviously a lot of Americans have a very high opinion of them.

You really should read Flux Capacitor's post. He spelled it out quite nicely. Because they start with New York and California, the Dems have a massive structural electoral advantage (if either of these states were competitive imagine how much money would have had to be spent in those media markets). Bush spent much time in October in New Jersey and Pennsylvannia and got neither. So given a strong candidate, and Hillary would be a strong candidate, it would be fairly easy to pick up Colorado or Arizona. Or maybe even Louisiana.


383 posted on 12/31/2004 2:10:30 PM PST by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: Sam the Sham
I thought the Clintons held the White House for eight years in the 90's. So obviously a lot of Americans have a very high opinion of them

Huh and the Pubs took control and held the House and Senate in 94, even after the best efforts of the MSM, and gained and bucked electoral history in 02 and 04.

Things must be pretty dismal in hillary's campaign basement for you to be that desparate, rhetorically, IMO.

390 posted on 12/31/2004 2:18:09 PM PST by Dane (trial lawyers are the parasites to wealth creating society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson