Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worldwide Earthquake Activity in the Last Seven Days -- Just Prior to 9.0 and until Dec 30
USGS Earthquake Program ^ | Dec 30, 2004

Posted on 12/30/2004 6:49:56 PM PST by topher

[This is a long list of data from that website at the time of posting to preserve the window -- topher.]

Current Time: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 02:26:20 UTC

Updated as of Fri Dec 31 00:10:28 UTC 2004.

DATE-(UTC)-TIME           Latitude         Longitude         Depth Magnitude            Comments

yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss       degrees         degrees             km                    

2004/12/30  17:58:09       12.26N          92.52E              17.6    5.9          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/30  17:34:44       6.74N            92.89E              27.9    5.5          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/30  15:02:18       9.49N            74.90W            50.5    4.8          NORTHERN COLOMBIA

2004/12/30  13:29:45       38.93N          141.48E            70.7    5.1          NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

2004/12/30  09:40:59       38.38N          135.44E            361.4 4.6          SEA OF JAPAN

2004/12/30  06:38:20       8.98N            92.31E              35.3    4.9          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/30  04:27:36       5.52N            94.27E              30.8    5.5          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/30  01:43:05       4.22N            94.25E              30       5.1          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/30  01:37:44       37.28N          119.38W          32.9    3.3          CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

2004/12/30  01:04:51       4.23N            94.20E              12.7    5.6          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/29  21:12:59       5.20N            94.71E              25.8    5.7          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/29  19:32:08       16.12N          47.20W            10       4.8          NORTHERN MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE

2004/12/29  18:50:20       5.54N            94.35E              38.6    5.6          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/29  17:25:48       38.81N          122.79W          2.5      2.9          NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

2004/12/29  13:58:52       38.51N          141.91E            54.8    5             NEAR EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

2004/12/29  13:20:25       28.89N          130.44E            7.7      5.7          RYUKYU ISLANDS, JAPAN

2004/12/29  05:56:50       8.78N            93.22E              30       6.2          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/29  01:50:55       9.08N            93.79E              24.9    6.1          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/29  01:39:41       8.32N            93.18E              30       5.8          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/28  23:07:53       6.73N            92.99E              30       5.1          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  21:47:26       8.93N            93.74E              9.5      5.5          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  21:07:35       53.28N          173.83W          251.4 5.8          ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS., ALASKA

2004/12/28  20:34:12       37.02N          28.34E              10       4.5          WESTERN TURKEY

2004/12/28  19:55:11       9.42N            93.66E              30       5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  17:11:16       9.92N            93.81E              46.3    5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  14:30:42       4.70N            95.24E              47       5.2          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/28  14:08:43       10.39N          93.02E              30       5.3          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  13:46:03       5.06N            96.16E              30       5.1          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/28  13:06:42       6.68N            93.05E              20.8    5.1          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  11:17:44       4.73N            95.21E              41.1    5.8          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/28  09:30:40       37.25N          138.80E            36       5.1          NEAR WEST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

2004/12/28  07:47:11       18.04N          120.35E            37.4    4.6          LUZON, PHILIPPINES

2004/12/28  07:20:59       11.38N          92.90E              30       4.9          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  05:36:13       9.51N            93.73E              30       5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  04:36:28       13.88N          93.33E              30       4.8          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  03:20:19       6.81N            92.81E              18.8    5.3          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  02:05:14       13.83N          93.47E              30       4.8          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/28  00:37:53       7.66N            94.16E              37.2    5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/27  20:36:18       8.98N            93.69E              30       5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  20:10:50       2.92N            95.61E              23.9    5.7          SIMEULUE, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  19:28:52       8.58N            93.66E              30       5.4          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  19:26:57       7.81N            92.13E              35.9    5             NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  19:16:09       11.57N          93.09E              30       5.1          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  19:13:19       11.61N          92.53E              26.3    5.6          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  18:24:04       9.29N            93.86E              27.3    4.9          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  18:09:33       2.75N            94.64E              41.6    5             OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  17:40:01       5.60N            93.16E              8.6      5.2          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  16:18:10       4.86N            94.25E              30.9    4.8          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  16:08:15       5.79N            93.12E              13.7    4.4          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  15:49:32       7.20N            92.27E              30       4.6          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  15:41:03       10.47N          92.86E              34       4.8          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  15:20:32       10.60N          93.59E              13.9    5.1          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  14:46:46       12.35N          92.50E              19       5.8          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  14:30:31       8.55N            93.86E              15.3    5.2          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  14:20:55       8.27N            93.55E              30       4.8          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  13:34:26       2.74N            95.64E              30       4.7          SIMEULUE, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  12:58:15       7.76N            93.23E              30       4.6          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  11:57:53       8.08N            92.28E              12.6    5.1          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  10:46:47       13.65N          93.07E              23.8    5.3          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  10:46:38       13.66N          93.10E              30       5.1          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  10:36:23       38.75N          122.73W          2.9      4.3          NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

2004/12/27  10:05:02       4.78N            95.11E              24.7    5.9          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  09:57:52       7.72N            92.67E              8.5      5.6          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  09:39:06       5.36N            94.66E              35       6.1          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  08:37:38       6.49N            93.26E              30       5.7          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  08:21:39       5.54N            94.60E              48.1    5.4          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  07:47:36       2.68N            94.48E              32.3    5.6          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  06:59:15       3.01N            95.54E              30       5.4          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  05:16:34       14.03N          93.09E              30       4.7          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  05:10:52       6.00N            93.21E              26.4    4.9          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  03:04:38       4.26S             152.68E            64.7    5.2          NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.

2004/12/27  00:49:28       13.00N          92.43E              18.5    6.1          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/27  00:32:16       5.49N            94.46E              33       6             NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/27  00:24:29       4.47N            93.76E              10       5.4          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/27  00:24:01       39.82N          120.79W          5.4      3.4          NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/26  21:13:44       39.82N          120.79W          5.1      3.8          NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

2004/12/26  21:06:51       4.59N            96.37E              45       5.6          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/26  20:50:32       6.36N            126.89E            102.5 5.8          MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES

2004/12/26  19:19:56       2.78N            94.17E              30       6.1          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  19:03:49       4.11N            94.24E              30       5.4          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  18:42:43       13.75N          92.97E              23.5    5.3          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  15:12:22       6.70N            92.99E              19.5    5.5          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  15:06:35       3.66N            94.01E              30       5.9          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  14:48:44       13.63N          92.87E              30       5.7          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  13:56:40       2.77N            94.46E              30       5.9          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  12:11:58       11.54N          92.42E              30       5.5          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  12:09:41       12.23N          92.61E              13.4    5.4          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  11:05:00       13.52N          92.86E              13.1    6.2          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  10:51:20       7.59N            92.33E              30       5.6          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  10:19:28       13.47N          92.78E              5.8      6.3          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  10:18:13       8.97N            93.72E              14.4    5.5          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  09:19:59       8.88N            92.35E              4.5      6.6          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  07:38:27       13.15N          93.02E              30       5.8          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  07:07:12       10.37N          93.73E              30       5.6          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  06:38:39       6.71N            92.94E              37.6    5.5          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  06:22:02       10.67N          92.33E              38.9    5.5          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  04:21:29       6.89N            92.90E              36.9    7.1          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  04:10:12       5.49N            92.92E              34.7    5.4          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  03:56:28       37.96N          118.66W          7.8      3.9          CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

2004/12/26  03:19:15       3.72N            93.82E              30       5.6          OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  03:17:52       7.16N            92.85E              30       5.8          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  03:08:44       13.74N          93.07E              30       5.9          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  02:59:14       3.20N            94.34E              30       5.8          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  02:52:01       12.48N          92.57E              30       6             ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  02:36:09       12.18N          92.96E              31.2    5.9          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  02:34:52       4.01N            94.15E              30       5.7          OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

2004/12/26  02:22:03       8.83N            92.54E              28       5.9          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  02:15:56       12.35N          92.54E              7.9      5.7          ANDAMAN ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  01:48:49       5.41N            94.46E              32.7    5.8          NORTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA

2004/12/26  01:21:21       6.39N            93.39E              30       6.2          NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA REGION

2004/12/26  00:58:53       3.32N            95.86E              30       9             OFF W COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/25  23:25:07       1.31N            127.42E            157.8 4.7          HALMAHERA, INDONESIA

2004/12/25  22:48:21       15.14N          92.31W            125.3 4.1          CHIAPAS, MEXICO

2004/12/25  22:25:39       19.10S          167.76E            35.1    5.2          VANUATU REGION

2004/12/25  22:20:46       5.99S             127.64E            347.6 4             BANDA SEA

2004/12/25  20:22:19       34.42N          32.10E              39       4.2          CYPRUS REGION

2004/12/25  18:17:33       6.22S             151.08E            63.5    4.6          NEW BRITAIN REGION, P.N.G.

2004/12/25  17:05:30       40.22S          173.52E            203     COOK STRAIT, NEW ZEALAND

2004/12/25  09:08:36       10.40N          72.57W            9.4      4.4          ZULIA, VENEZUELA

                                                                                                                       

2004/12/24  23:54:49       6.60S             109.25E            277     4.5          JAVA, INDONESIA

2004/12/24  19:36:38       19.21S          167.76E            32.7    5.3          VANUATU REGION

2004/12/24  13:49:56       20.06S          178.84W          600     4.6          FIJI REGION

2004/12/24  13:39:44       20.15S          178.76W          615.5 5.2          FIJI REGION

2004/12/24  13:32:16       20.14S          178.65W          600     4.4          FIJI REGION

2004/12/24  05:31:44       50.12S          161.36E            10       5.4          NORTH OF MACQUARIE ISLAND

                                                                                                                       


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: artbellhangup; byebyeaftershocks; callingartbell; earthquake; onlyaftershocks; quakesdiminishing; theskyisfalling; weredoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: combat_boots
Wasn't there something about a meteorite? And Antarctica, too? ... [snip]

First, this is all Southern Hemisphere stuff -- the 9.0 was on one side Australia and North, and the 8.1 [on December 23rd 2004] was on the East side of Australia and South.

The meteorite was an asteriod that supposedly came close to the earth during Full Moon. The Full Moon is known to have an effect on tides.

South of New Zealand was an 8.1 earthquake [12/23/04] that everybody was so concerned about the penquins being hurt by huge chunks of ice falling into the ocean [from Antartica].

There is a possibility that a combination of events somehow played a role -- but I would be second guessing.

But science is in its infancy in some respects.

There was some sort of tsumani in Alaska [years ago] or some huge tidal wave because of alleged hugh chunks of rocks falling into the ocean. The only problem is that recently, scientists did some underwater research in the water and found no trace.

Basically you are talking about astronomy, geology, and physics all interplaying. This is a non-trivial mathematical model just to conceive and build just to take some of the events and put them into play.

You have to build models for the Astro-physics as well as factors in two major oceans -- the Pacific and Indian oceans.

Additionally, it needs to be determined what type of fault and what event happened when the 9.0 happened. This might be difficult just because of the enormous damage and the very deep water involved.

Important data was lost on this event -- no tsunami monitoring in the Indian Ocean to help predict may also mean that trying to figure out some of the factors before hand are just lost data.

But what you could be pointing to is the asteroid playing a factor at the time of the full moon.

This is then complicated by a fairly large earthquake -- 8.1 -- and very shallow quake. This means the New Zealand quake might have generated a tsunami that hit Antartica. The water displaced there might have freely flowed in the huge Pacific ocean but somehow got hung up in the Indian ocean in the ring of fire -- building up pressure on an earthquake fault.

[Note swallow earthquakes are known to generate tsunamis from what I have read].

However, and this is really a big if, a major current of water from Antartica could have flowed North on the other side of Australia, and built up pressure [somehow] in the ring of fire.

There are too many if's and too many variables. You may be totally right, but it would take alot of analysis before someone might be able to prove/disprove what you are alluding to.

Speculation right now is dangerous because it might spread panic. Taking information and saying it means one thing that scares people when there is no proof is irresponsible. And the MSM does this all the time.

What you are saying is possible, it just might take 10 to 20 years to prove -- or alot less.

21 posted on 12/30/2004 10:02:07 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; topher
For 12/31/04, area is really quiet so far. I hope someone is telling people in the region that when these shocks hit that is to be expected and not to worry.

But after the 9.0 + tsunami, how can you reassure the survivors.

Praying for aftershocks to stop...

22 posted on 12/31/2004 4:49:54 AM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: topher
Massive earthquake shakes island

December 24, 2004

THE world's biggest earthquake in almost four years has struck 800km off the coast of Tasmania, Australian seismological officials said. Geoscience Australia said the quake, measuring 8.1 on the Richter Scale, hit the Macquarie Rise in the Pacific Ocean at 1.59am (AEDT).

The earthquake, which occurred half-way between Australia and Antarctica, was felt throughout Tasmania, seismologist Cvetan Sinadinovski said.

23 posted on 12/31/2004 10:46:22 AM PST by P.O.E. (Happy New Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
My penguin talk was about:


24 posted on 12/31/2004 1:33:04 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
My penguin talk was about:

Penguins escape Massive Earthquake BBC article posted on Freerepublic -- talks about the same earthquake.

25 posted on 12/31/2004 1:54:20 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: topher
Penguins are:
CUTEDELICIOUS, AND FUN

My score:246851

Just a bit of Friday silliness.

26 posted on 12/31/2004 2:34:35 PM PST by P.O.E. (Happy New Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom
They could, but remember that a magnitude 7 earthquake is 1/100 as strong as a magnitude 9.
27 posted on 12/31/2004 2:39:16 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: topher
astronomy, geology, and physics all inter-playing

Since when do these sciences in actual fact not interplay, except in academe? As for your accusation of being irresponsible, I find it objectionable simply due to the recent history of the area. Yes. It is in the Southern Hemisphere. Very good of you to notice.

That my musings are not proved by empiricism is not bothering me now. What does bother me is that I have not heard anything on the news of the recent events of the last two weeks, other than this major event. I would like to hear from someone with enough prescience to enumerate the geophysical facts of the area in the same way that we have lead ups to quake information here in the US. The bits of information I have read is that the original 8.9/9.0 earthquake alert/potential tsunami was not acted upon in at least one place, and that Sri Lanka and India are not members of the international federation set up after the 1964 Alaska earthquake that caused 100' tsunamis (See http://wwwshs1.bham.wednet.edu/curric/science/geophys/granat/Alaska.htm) and a need for NOAA to totally remap the ocean floor there. Also, Thailand did not have sensors set up where they were needed. See http://metzger.ws/sediments/index.php?p=34 "The US scientific community is talking today about the widespread death and destruction caused by the tsunamis triggered by the Sunday’s great earthquake (see below) off Sumatra. They are talking about how the senseless loss of life could have been prevented. The problem lies not in the fact that there is no warning system. On the contrary, an international system of sensors and warning systems was established after the 1964 Alaska earthquake. The system, which is administered by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, includes most of the major nations that are affected by the Ring of Fire which is the area of the Pacific Ocean and surrounding bodies of water where many earthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur. Without going into minute detail, the ocean floor in this are has many large trenches and underwater volcanoes. As a result of plate movement and eruptions, earthquakes occur frequently and, with earthquakes, come tsunamis. (large map of the Ring of Fire, courtesy of the USGS) The problem is that not all nations that could be potentially affected by tsunamis are members of the warning system. Which countries are missing? Most notably, the countries of India and Sri Lanka are not members. The director of NOAA’s Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, Charles McCreary, told the Associated Press “that’s because tsunamis are much less frequent in the Indian Ocean.” The AP article also noted that “although Thailand belongs to the international tsunami warning network, its west coast does not have the system’s wave sensors mounted on ocean buoys.” Thailand’s west coast resort of Phuket sustained loss of life and property as well from tsunamis."
28 posted on 12/31/2004 3:33:41 PM PST by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
astronomy, geology, and physics all inter-playing

Since when do these sciences in actual fact not interplay, except in academe? As for your accusation of being irresponsible, I find it objectionable simply due to the recent history of the area. Yes. It is in the Southern Hemisphere. Very good of you to notice.

You are not irresponsible, but I was trying to be careful with my response to say that jumping to conclusions might scare people [people who are uptight right now]. And the MSM is really the ones that should avoid reporting anything along the lines of what you are saying -- this should be reported in a scientific journal -- after studies made.

Too many people may not understand the science. For example, what I heard elsewhere was the asteroid was directly on the opposite side of the earth when this occurred but I cannot put my fingers on a hard link of evidence that this is true.

I was trying not to scare people. You were going about this very scientific, but we, and I do include myself, must be careful what we post.

And the last people I want to report about this is the MSM. Some of their reporting is really bad right now -- a natural gas mud field has turned into an erupting volcano by a French News Service [AFP].

29 posted on 12/31/2004 5:21:41 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
The bits of information I have read is that the original 8.9/9.0 earthquake alert/potential tsunami was not acted upon in at least one place, and that Sri Lanka and India are not members of the international federation set up after the 1964 Alaska earthquake that caused 100' tsunamis

Times of India had an article about this. Basically, there is no tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean. Hawaii has a Pacific tsunami warning system.

You would need measuring points in various places that are not set up at the moment.

Diego Garcia could be a measuring point, along with a number of places in the Islands that India has, Sri Lanka, the coast of India, the Indian Ocean side of Indonesia.

India has had two tsunamis in the 20th century and no this one in the 21st century. But there was no interest when scientists tried to get a system in place before this tsunami by the government of India.

30 posted on 12/31/2004 5:27:43 PM PST by topher (God bless & Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Barte45
And isn't most of it not even noticeable, even 4 and 5.0?

I simply never feel a 4.0 although many do. I sometimes even miss the 5.0s ... but then I'm a Los Angeles native.

31 posted on 12/31/2004 5:31:32 PM PST by BunnySlippers (Happy Festivus ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: topher
Times of India had an article about this. Basically, there is no tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean. Hawaii has a Pacific tsunami warning system.

I was astonished today to read in some news source that 90% of the tsunamis are in the Pacific! No wonder they were less inclined to think one was forming.

32 posted on 12/31/2004 5:34:17 PM PST by BunnySlippers (Happy Festivus ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: topher

Thank you for posting the info about Dodge. I read specifically that Diego Garcia had no problems with the tsunami.

Agreed that the MSM is not a viable source for linking the dots. I would have thought that after the 9.2 in Alaska, although there was no major loss of life due to the sparce population, there would have been more effort than a warning system as a result. Of course, NOAA was remapping the ocean floor there into the 80s.

I hope that this event produces more than that warning system's overdue completion. To think that some of these folks could have been asleep on the beach or in their beds because they had no warning is truly shameful.


33 posted on 01/01/2005 7:42:16 AM PST by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I was astonished today to read in some news source that 90% of the tsunamis are in the Pacific! No wonder they were less inclined to think one was forming.

Some tsunamis are very local -- Japan, Alaska, Islands like Hawaii, etc.

The volcano Krakatoa erupted [blew up is the correct word] in 1883. The tsunami generated reached San Francisco -- although it was only 0.1 meters high.

But when Krakatoa went off in the same general area, the explosion was so loud that the Island of Diego Garcia, over 2000 miles away, the people thought a ship was firing its cannons because it was in distress. Sort of like something happening in Houston, Texas or New Orleans, LA and being heard in Los Angeles -- though the open sea conducts sound much better than land masses such as the Rocky Mountains.

34 posted on 01/01/2005 11:02:48 AM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
I hope that this event produces more than that warning system's overdue completion.

The Times of India said one reason a warning system was not in place is that with India's huge population [over 1 billion people], losing a few people to such an event was acceptable.

35 posted on 01/01/2005 11:06:15 AM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole; PennsylvaniaMom
They could, but remember that a magnitude 7 earthquake is 1/100 as strong as a magnitude 9.

But the energy is a factor of 32 with each magnitude. So the a 9.0 generates 1024 times more energy than a 7.0 -- which makes alot of California quakes seem alot smaller.

36 posted on 01/01/2005 11:09:51 AM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: topher
Some group is claiming these aftershocks may have a bad result. I won't speculate. This is Assam that I am referring to. This is a wait and see if they are correct.

Only point to post is make people alert in that area.

Right now, the aftershocks are terrifying people who have survived the tsunami.

37 posted on 01/01/2005 6:26:42 PM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
Here are the key events for your scenario [and mine] after further research:

1. Giant Iceberg breaks away from Antartica. Iceberg is so big it could supply Nile River valley for 80 years.

2. 8.1 Earthquake South of New Zealand/Australia

3. Full Moon/Asteroid event -- I don't know much about this except Full Moon is supposed to affect tides.

4. Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake -- very shallow and apparently the right type of quake to generate number 5.

5. Tsunami of December 26, 2004 -- a natural disaster that will make the hurricanes of the Gulf of Mexico of 2004 pale by comparison.

The billion dollar question(s) is: would the elimination/changes in any of 1-3 change 4 & 5. Is there an event #6 yet to come -- volcano eruption/earthquake -- caused by numbers 1-5.

I am also alluding to how difficult to try to program a model for all of this. In a sense, the huge, melting iceberg would have [1] displaced water when it broke away and [2] started melting.

How much water was displaced by #2 and #3.

The key to the above is that the East Indies have a number of Islands/straits that restrict water movement from Pacific to Indian Oceans and vice-a-versa.

Friction would play into this -- i.e., the water in the Pacific is allowed to flow freely into the Pacific because of the huge opening nearing 1 & 2, but cause friction/displacements with Indian Ocean.

That could conceivably cause pressure to build up somehow [water or plate pressure] to cause #4.

Finally, with the huge displacement of water, are all events now ended by this series of events?

38 posted on 01/01/2005 9:29:50 PM PST by topher (In God We Trust -- on the money of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: topher

Very good outline of events. Good job.


39 posted on 01/02/2005 1:50:55 PM PST by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Elvis van Foster
"They've determined the cause on DU: oil companies drilling and secret nuclear tests that avoid seismic detection. I kid you not."

We know you're not kidding - that's why they call them environmental wacko's.

I heard one call into Rush's show last week suggesting that building all those highways & cutting those channels into the earth could possibly cause the ground to split way down deep. I think the guy was rolling his own if you know what I mean.

40 posted on 01/02/2005 1:58:50 PM PST by patriot_wes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson