To: RedBloodedAmerican
Thanks for posting. After watching videos I still have not seen a 30ft wave...wonder if anyone has video of that?
5 posted on
12/30/2004 11:29:43 AM PST by
RushCrush
("Before I refuse to take your questions, I have an opening statement." Reagan)
To: RushCrush
wonder if anyone has video of that?If they did, I imagine they are dead.
8 posted on
12/30/2004 11:31:19 AM PST by
Howlin
To: RushCrush
All the clips we're seeing are from Thailand or Sri Lanka, but we know the worst of it went to Aceh which was 100 miles from the epicenter. The firt video is purportedly from Aceh, and it seems like receding water is at the height of the roofs.
13 posted on
12/30/2004 11:41:18 AM PST by
GeraldP
(Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.)
To: RushCrush
15 posted on
12/30/2004 11:44:01 AM PST by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: RushCrush
You won't see a 30 foot wave. The wave would be 30 ft. at the beach level, but anybody that close would not have survived it. By the time they get inland they are smaller, but still deadly. Look at the video from Indonesia.
21 posted on
12/30/2004 11:50:16 AM PST by
Bon mots
To: RushCrush
I haven't seen video yet that really drives home the height of these tsunamis, but www.boston.com posted these two pictures and said they were new as of today. Both of these show the immense nature of these waves unlike anything else I have seen, especially the first one.
27 posted on
12/30/2004 12:22:22 PM PST by
cwiz24
(Hey Democrats---Now who's ya daddy?)
To: RushCrush
I havent seen a "30" but the height is from tough to tip and I am not sure if that includes the tidal surge which seems like that was the bulk of the damage
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
