Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeinIraq
the Tsunami was only about 6-10 feet high....

That's interesting! 3-4 foot waves are common on the ocean, so I would never have suspected that the tsunami that caused this much devastation would have a wave height that small.

I was envisioning these 50 feet walls of water....

15 posted on 12/30/2004 7:14:00 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

well if you think about it, water is one of the most powerful forces on Earth.

It isnt the height, its the momentum of such an event....

These waves had been going for hundreds of miles...which was just building up the force higher and higher......


18 posted on 12/30/2004 7:15:33 AM PST by MikefromOhio (11 days until I can leave Iraq and stop selling hot dogs in Baghdad....and boycotting boycotts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Caption says first of six.Perhaps 2-6 were bigger.


19 posted on 12/30/2004 7:15:36 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Problem is, the tsunami wave just keeps coming. Regular waves receed after a few seconds.


23 posted on 12/30/2004 7:16:22 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
I think what happens Laz is that the wave height varies from event tot event and place to place. As this one reaches shollower water, it increases in height exponentially. At Diego Garcia, the ocean base is so steep just off shore that the wave passes by as a small event.

The record of the century was 1700 ft tall in an Alaska Bay directly accross from a earthquake induced mountain collapse. It scoured the opposite side of the bay to that height removing a forest, so they know its actual height.

The well known one at Hilo came ashore as 30 feet high as I recall the stories.

Each is different based on the volume of water displaced and the sea-bed rise where it comes ashore.

39 posted on 12/30/2004 7:21:22 AM PST by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
"That's interesting! 3-4 foot waves are common on the ocean, so I would never have suspected that the tsunami that caused this much devastation would have a wave height that small. I was envisioning these 50 feet walls of water...."

It's not the height of the wave, it's the velocity. They travel at incredible speeds.

59 posted on 12/30/2004 7:27:29 AM PST by redhead ("Gee, Ricky. I'm sorry your mom blew up...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

They build as they get closer to shore. It effectively will raise the ocean level and cause a storm surge similar to a hurricane. Even if it stays 6-10 feet a wall of water 6-10 foot high could ruin your day.


60 posted on 12/30/2004 7:27:31 AM PST by Nov3 ("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
the Tsunami was only about 6-10 feet high....

That was the first wave.The second was alot higher,you can see it getting ready to swamp those fairly large sail boats.It was the second larger wave that did most of the death and destruction.

71 posted on 12/30/2004 7:31:58 AM PST by painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I remember my first experience with the ocean (I'm from Wisconsin).

I ran into the surf (maybe 3 or 4 foot waves). I'm about 400 pounds, the first wave picked me up and slammed me down, thank you very much.

My wife has a picture and thinks it was funny, but I got some skin left in the sand.

I have a lot more respect for the ocean.


93 posted on 12/30/2004 7:44:08 AM PST by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

The wall of water was described as 30 feet tall. That's water in the background


106 posted on 12/30/2004 7:51:23 AM PST by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
That's interesting! 3-4 foot waves are common on the ocean, so I would never have suspected that the tsunami that caused this much devastation would have a wave height that small.

From what I understand it wasn't the force of the water that did damage, it was simply a rise in the water level of about 15 feet which very quickly flooded the area and carried things with it. If you had on a life jacket you would likely have survived the tsunami if you didn't get caught under something.

107 posted on 12/30/2004 7:52:39 AM PST by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
I was envisioning these 50 feet walls of water....

The reports I read said they were thirty feet or more. They get bigger as the depth gets shallower. It may only be six feet (I'd say bigger,however) in the first picture and still raise to 30 feet as it came onshore.

123 posted on 12/30/2004 8:06:38 AM PST by Aeronaut (Merry CHRISTmas. (Member of Christians for inclusion in Christmas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

"That's interesting! 3-4 foot waves are common on the ocean, so I would never have suspected that the tsunami that caused this much devastation would have a wave height that small."

The difference is the amount of water behind them. Most waves are only a few feet thick. Tsunamis can be miles thick. Imagine the whole ocean suddenly rising ten feet and burying the land.


148 posted on 12/30/2004 9:21:41 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
"I was envisioning these 50 feet walls of water...."

If I recall, tsunamis are capped in the 30 foot range due to the mechanism by which they are caused. Or so I recall from a TV show on the subject. The difference is the speed and volume of the wave.
175 posted on 12/30/2004 10:07:30 AM PST by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Well, when it gets pulled outward to see to rise up, it springs back really fast. They are not ordinary waves, which is why they kill and your normal big waves at the beach don't.


293 posted on 12/30/2004 4:24:59 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Also, after the wave passes, the water is disturbed for a long time....look at some of digital globe's sat pics. The water is churning and choppy even after the tsunami recedes.


294 posted on 12/30/2004 4:25:50 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

it looks like this is the FIRST wave ... in first-hand accounts, it sounds like the first wave was bad, but the second was the killer ... as high as 20-30 feet. And at that speed (some said high as 500 mph), took pretty much everything in its path.


380 posted on 01/01/2005 7:15:39 AM PST by EDINVA (a FReeper in PJ's beats a CBS anchor in a suit every time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
It was posted earlier....am looking for the link.

The wave height was different at various locations.

Places were just wiped clean - photo's from sat - just incredible.

IMHO, most of the video / pics you see on the web do not do justice to what actually happened - they look lame. But that is only one location.

411 posted on 01/05/2005 6:33:29 PM PST by LasVegasMac (I'm John Kerry and I am reporting for ...unemployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson