Skip to comments.
Are We Stingy? Yes
NYT ^
| 30 December 2004
| Who Really Cares?
Posted on 12/30/2004 5:07:39 AM PST by .cnI redruM
President Bush finally roused himself yesterday from his vacation in Crawford, Tex., to telephone his sympathy to the leaders of India, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Indonesia, and to speak publicly about the devastation of Sunday's tsunamis in Asia. He also hurried to put as much distance as possible between himself and America's initial measly aid offer of $15 million, and he took issue with an earlier statement by the United Nations' emergency relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, who had called the overall aid efforts by rich Western nations "stingy." "The person who made that statement was very misguided and ill informed," the president said.
We beg to differ. Mr. Egeland was right on target. We hope Secretary of State Colin Powell was privately embarrassed when, two days into a catastrophic disaster that hit 12 of the world's poorer countries and will cost billions of dollars to meliorate, he held a press conference to say that America, the world's richest nation, would contribute $15 million. That's less than half of what Republicans plan to spend on the Bush inaugural festivities.
The American aid figure for the current disaster is now $35 million, and we applaud Mr. Bush's turnaround. But $35 million remains a miserly drop in the bucket, and is in keeping with the pitiful amount of the United States budget that we allocate for nonmilitary foreign aid. According to a poll, most Americans believe the United States spends 24 percent of its budget on aid to poor countries; it actually spends well under a quarter of 1 percent.
______________________Snip______________________________
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blameamericafirst; humanitarianrelief; janegeland; leftistnimrods; stingy; sumatraquake; un; whous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
The NYT is at it again. They didn't even need Maureen Dowd to produce this pile of journalistic offal.
To: .cnI redruM
The Slimes needs to make a substantial contribution from corporate funds before they start banging the drum for more tax money for this effort. Generous with other peoples money, I guess.
To: .cnI redruM
This Egeland jackass who called us stingy makes over $300,000.00 per year TAX FREE. Then he has the nerve to go on television and say that WE peasants should be forced to pay more taxes so he can have more money to distribute to the needy.
The hubris is shocking.
He makes more money than President Bush and is charged with aiding the victims of catastrophes... yet the press has chosen to attack President Bush again as if this were all somehow his fault.
Grrrrrrrrrrr
3
posted on
12/30/2004 5:10:04 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: .cnI redruM
If we are sting, the rest of the world is stingier.
4
posted on
12/30/2004 5:10:52 AM PST
by
marvlus
To: marvlus
If we are stingstingy, the rest of the world is stingier.
5
posted on
12/30/2004 5:11:28 AM PST
by
marvlus
To: .cnI redruM
According to a poll, most Americans believe the United States spends 24 percent of its budget on aid to poor countries; it actually spends well under a quarter of 1 percent. So, in short, most Americans are ignorant with regard to governmental spending.
That isn't exactly a shocking revelation.
To: .cnI redruM
When the NYT sells a block of stock and donates it to the tsunami victims, I'll listen. Otherwise, they can drink a gallon jug of STFU!
7
posted on
12/30/2004 5:12:34 AM PST
by
HMFIC
(US Marines, you yell, we shell.)
To: HMFIC
Yep. And I also want an accounting of what each writer has personally given to relief efforts - listed at the end of each article, and as a percentage of their net worth.
To: .cnI redruM
The writer of this screed forgets there is a difference between a natural disaster and a declaration of war.
If we let AQ and the jihadists go unchallenged, they will be back and will destroy America, at least economically. The same America that is so strong economically that we give more money in aid to countries all around the world than any other country.
9
posted on
12/30/2004 5:15:41 AM PST
by
Peach
To: .cnI redruM
The NYT doesn't need an excuse to defame Americans, but the fact that our government reacts to this BS by increasing its aid doesn't help.
If I had not cancelled my subscription to the NYT years ago, I'd be delighted to do it again.
To: NittanyLion
There again it is clear that only "government tax dollars" are relevant for determining which countries are stingy and which are not. I am dumbfounded that they totally disregard the private charities in determining how much we give.
There are tens of thousands dead in one day and many more that are dying and the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed. They are more interested in bashing Bush for winning then the death and suffering of others. How much did this writer donate? Or does he consider his taxes his contribution? They are continuing to step right into the beginnings of irrelevance.
BTW - the redstates are more generous than the blue states I hear. figures. How long til they get over the Bush victory - methinks, never.
11
posted on
12/30/2004 5:19:40 AM PST
by
commonguymd
(the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
To: .cnI redruM
Question for the paper: Where was all this concern while Oil For Food was being ripped off by the billions and the Iraqi people were being brutalized with the proceeds?
12
posted on
12/30/2004 5:21:33 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: johniegrad
Yeah, let's see. They can hand out their editorial page to any survivors who need to vomit and get bad food out of their system.
13
posted on
12/30/2004 5:22:26 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(The UN thinks we're stingy? We need to show those pricks stingy!)
To: .cnI redruM
And from it's mighty perch, inhabited by the intellectual elite of the world, bravely fighting to improve the lives of all of us inferior Americans, the New York Times has contributed exactly how much?
14
posted on
12/30/2004 5:22:48 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: commonguymd
There are tens of thousands dead in one day and many more that are dying and the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed. It's self-loathing. No matter how much the US donates via the private and public sectors, liberals will continue to find a reason to hate the US.
To: .cnI redruM
The Slimes' reaction is just a Bash-Bush Kneejerk. They'd never do such a thing to Clinton, even if only the President were changed.
16
posted on
12/30/2004 5:23:25 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
To: Bon mots
Ah yes, the Washington Polemic and the Gay York Times. With news outlets such as these, Osauma probably really does believe he's winning.
17
posted on
12/30/2004 5:23:43 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(The UN thinks we're stingy? We need to show those pricks stingy!)
To: Romulus
Looks like the NYT has taken your talking points to heart from the other day...
18
posted on
12/30/2004 5:23:54 AM PST
by
Sam's Army
(No witty taglines currently come to mind)
To: .cnI redruM
It's an unsigned editorial. They are learning.
BTW, the cowardly writer mentioned "Bam" and our pledge of aid to the victims of the earthquake that happened there last year ~ he assumes that it is all our fault that the victims haven't received our aid.
Might it more likely be the case that the brutal regime in charge of Iran has placed impediments in the way? Maybe they did it in collusion with the editors of the NYT as has been the case many times in the past.
19
posted on
12/30/2004 5:24:13 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: .cnI redruM
We are NOT "stingy". We are THRIFTY. We know that private money and private distribution systems are far more effective than public money.
NYT - Kiss my big, fat, hairy, all-American a$$!
20
posted on
12/30/2004 5:25:02 AM PST
by
MortMan
(Truth, unlike beauty, is not subjective.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson