To: NittanyLion
There again it is clear that only "government tax dollars" are relevant for determining which countries are stingy and which are not. I am dumbfounded that they totally disregard the private charities in determining how much we give.
There are tens of thousands dead in one day and many more that are dying and the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed. They are more interested in bashing Bush for winning then the death and suffering of others. How much did this writer donate? Or does he consider his taxes his contribution? They are continuing to step right into the beginnings of irrelevance.
BTW - the redstates are more generous than the blue states I hear. figures. How long til they get over the Bush victory - methinks, never.
11 posted on
12/30/2004 5:19:40 AM PST by
commonguymd
(the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
To: commonguymd
There are tens of thousands dead in one day and many more that are dying and the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed. It's self-loathing. No matter how much the US donates via the private and public sectors, liberals will continue to find a reason to hate the US.
To: commonguymd
"There are tens of thousands dead in one day and many more that are dying and the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed."
I wish that could fit in a tagline.
26 posted on
12/30/2004 5:27:17 AM PST by
.cnI redruM
(The UN thinks we're stingy? We need to show those pricks stingy!)
To: commonguymd
"the NYT and the UN are worried about how much we are NOT taxed. " Not only the NYT and the UN but so are all the loony libs. They can foam at the mouth all they want who cares. If they are so darn concerned than they need to open their pocketbooks and put their money where their big mouths are.
Don't get me started........;)
30 posted on
12/30/2004 5:29:05 AM PST by
stopem
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson