Skip to comments.
Farewell and Thanks (Al Hunt's Last Wall Street Journal Column!)
Wall Street Journal (subscription required) ^
Posted on 12/30/2004 4:22:25 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
In 1993, I had lunch with The Wall Street Journal's editorial-page editor, Bob Bartley, to discuss launching what he envisioned as a contrarian column.
With Bob, who passed away a year ago, small talk never was easy. But he was very smart and had lots of views about column writing and what would work. It made sense, I replied, but noted there were areas where I shared the editorial page's viewpoint, free trade for example. "In all due respect," my taciturn luncheon partner replied, "if I want a column on free trade, I can do better than you."
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alhunt; buhbye; cya; goodriddance; theend
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Strangely, there was nothing in the column, or anywhere else in the news that I could find, that explained why Hunt was giving up his column. I always saw Hunt as the prototypical 'wet' liberal, who I suspected tried to stay in the good graces of his wife Judy Woodruff by dutifully toeing the liberal line.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I stopped reading his column shortly after it first appeared. He was a standard 'rat liberal unworthy of an otherwise great newspaper.
2
posted on
12/30/2004 4:26:22 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Democrats soil the institutions they control)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I always looked at him as a major league assh*le.
3
posted on
12/30/2004 4:28:12 AM PST
by
Larry381
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"who I suspected tried to stay in the good graces of his wife Judy Woodruff by dutifully toeing the liberal line." Would you cross that bit@#? She's scary. True evil never dies, it has to be exorcised. They are going to need a wooden stake and cross when they try to show her the door.
4
posted on
12/30/2004 4:28:43 AM PST
by
huac
To: governsleastgovernsbest
His column was a waste of perfectly good op-ed space. I never read it and I doubt many other Journal readers did, either.
5
posted on
12/30/2004 4:30:10 AM PST
by
jalisco555
("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"In all due respect," my taciturn luncheon partner replied, "if I want a column on free trade, I can do better than you."Or one on any other subject. Vale, Al Hunt -- and good riddance.
6
posted on
12/30/2004 4:30:48 AM PST
by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: jalisco555
Agreed. Don't think the column made much of a ripple anywhere.
7
posted on
12/30/2004 4:32:04 AM PST
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
In response to the news, Hunt's legions of fans take to the streets in tribute...
8
posted on
12/30/2004 4:40:14 AM PST
by
Jhensy
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Odious best describes Hunt and his wife.
Whenever we were called to take a subscription to the WSJ I would always tell them to call back when Al Hunt was gone.
9
posted on
12/30/2004 4:50:15 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hunt and his column were banal to be chaitable
A real light weight in the brain department
A walking liberal cliche
He and Margret Carlson made a great pair on Capital Gang
Put both of their intellects together and you couldn't come up with a decent political thought
10
posted on
12/30/2004 4:51:12 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Agreed. Don't think the column made much of a ripple anywhere.Hunt's real influence was as Washington Bureau Chief, giving the news reporting a leftist slant.
11
posted on
12/30/2004 5:01:07 AM PST
by
jalisco555
("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats)
To: Jhensy
LOL. Well, at least according to the column, he had two regular readers. Then again, they disagreed vehemently with him!
To: jalisco555
Hunt's real influence was as Washington Bureau Chief, giving the news reporting a leftist slant.Important point. I read an analysis of the major papers that showed that, amazingly, the WSJ's news pages was the most left-slanted - even worse than the NYT. Thanks for nuthin' Al.
To: Jhensy
14
posted on
12/30/2004 5:06:17 AM PST
by
aShepard
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good riddance to bad rubbage.
15
posted on
12/30/2004 5:12:10 AM PST
by
keysguy
(Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Just another liberal Dinosaur facing extinction. Sound like he is joining Dan Rather, in getting out while the getting is good.
16
posted on
12/30/2004 5:17:07 AM PST
by
sr4402
To: sr4402

'What do you mean? We are the mainstream media and you should believe us just like you believed in my National Guard documents against the President.'
/Sarcasm OFF
17
posted on
12/30/2004 5:19:01 AM PST
by
sr4402
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This news really made my day...and it's only 5:19 on the West Coast. As a long-time WSJ subscriber, I can only say "it's about time!"
To: governsleastgovernsbest
As the inmates led by Hunt had taken over the institution that is the Wall Street Journal in Washington, I shudder to think what's next. At least with Hunt in Fantasyland misdiagnosing the real causative factors of most problems, we could be assured that the Dems would never get it right.
19
posted on
12/30/2004 5:34:04 AM PST
by
OESY
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good riddance, Al. And please don't write or call.
20
posted on
12/30/2004 5:38:30 AM PST
by
ml1954
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson