Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human brain result of 'extraordinarily fast' evolution
The Guardian (UK) ^ | Wednesday December 29, 2004 | Alok Jha, science correspondent

Posted on 12/29/2004 9:14:28 AM PST by aculeus

Emergence of society may have spurred growth

The sophistication of the human brain is not simply the result of steady evolution, according to new research. Instead, humans are truly privileged animals with brains that have developed in a type of extraordinarily fast evolution that is unique to the species.

"Simply put, evolution has been working very hard to produce us humans," said Bruce Lahn, an assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago and an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

"Our study offers the first genetic evidence that humans occupy a unique position in the tree of life."

Professor Lahn's research, published this week in the journal Cell, suggests that humans evolved their cognitive abilities not owing to a few sporadic and accidental genetic mutations - as is the usual way with traits in living things - but rather from an enormous number of mutations in a short period of time, acquired though an intense selection process favouring complex cognitive abilities.

Evolutionary biologists generally argue that humans have evolved in much the same way as all other life on Earth. Mutations in genes from one generation to the next sometimes give rise to new adaptations to a creature's environment.

Those best adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and pass on their genes to the next generation.

The evolution of a large brain in humans, then, can be seen as similar to the process that leads to longer tusks or bigger antlers. In general terms, and after scaling for body size, brains get bigger and more complex as animals get bigger.

But with humans, the relative size of the brain does not fit the trend - our brains are disproportionately big, much bigger even than the brains of other non-human primates, including our closest relatives, chimpanzees.

Prof Lahn's team examined the DNA of 214 genes involved in brain development in humans, macaques, rats and mice.

By comparing mutations that had no effect on the function of the genes with those mutations that did, they came up with a measure of the pressure of natural selection on those genes.

The scientists found that the human brain's genes had gone through an intense amount of evolution in a short amount of time - a process that far outstripped the evolution of the genes of other animals.

"We've proven that there is a big distinction," Prof Lahn said. "Human evolution is, in fact, a privileged process because it involves a large number of mutations in a large number of genes.

"To accomplish so much in so little evolutionary time - a few tens of millions of years - requires a selective process that is perhaps categorically different from the typical processes of acquiring new biological traits."

As for how all of this happened, the professor suggests that the development of human society may be the reason.

In an increasingly social environment, greater cognitive abilities probably became more of an advantage.

"As humans become more social, differences in intelligence will translate into much greater differences in fitness, because you can manipulate your social structure to your advantage," he said.

"Even devoid of the social context, as humans become more intelligent, it might create a situation where being a little smarter matters a lot.

"The making of the large human brain is not just the neurological equivalent of making a large antler. Rather, it required a level of selection that's unprecedented."

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: brain; creation; crevo; crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-549 next last
To: HamiltonJay

I agree, you can believe in evolution and still be a christian and creationist.


521 posted on 01/02/2005 12:18:15 AM PST by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

It's the timeframe, but I also don't believe the bible speaks to anyone. I believe that people read the bible, and interpret it, and love the words that are contained in it. I believe that some people follow the teachings that are in the bible and are drawn closer to God by his word.


522 posted on 01/02/2005 5:09:30 AM PST by imfleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
demonstrate to whom?

To other scientists.

523 posted on 01/02/2005 8:49:47 AM PST by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
There seems to be an odd disorder in your taste buds. Well, more for me!

True. I have a "beneficial mutation" for modern life.

524 posted on 01/02/2005 9:33:29 AM PST by balrog666 (I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Oh, man, that was such a pathetic response...

So, let's see, you don't want to teach the science of evolution because you find Darwin's views on race and sex to be offense? Nice ad hominem attack. Don't teach the science of evolution in schools because English society during the Victorian Era held distasteful views on women and black people--your powers of reasoning are breathtaking.

Marvin Lubenow is not a "Darwinist/macroevolutionist". He is a creationist. It shows the absolute bankruptcy of your position that you have to lie about him to support your ridiculous argument. Who are you going to cite next, the famed evolutionary biologist Duane Gish??

"... every Darwinist does argue from an unproven and unprovable premise: that something can come out of nothing.

Wrong. Typical ill-informed creationist crap. Evolution doesn't require "something from nothing". It is about descent with modification. Even abiogenesis doesn't require "something from nothing".

That takes "Darwinianism" out of the realm of science and into the realm of blind faith religion. If you want to have a theological debate, that's one thing. But don't assert that evolution is factually correct ...and don't force the state to spread that doctrine in schools.

Again, you are talking out of your ass. The science of evolution is based on the millions of data points that support the theory. That is not science, not religion.

And the creationist tactic to assert that evolution and creationism are equally scientific or equally religious is as tiresome as it is mendacious.

Religion is when you reject the scientific data, or make meaningless distinctions like "macroevolution" and "microevolution", or waste your time arguing between the mutually ridiculous contentions such as "young earth" versus "old earth", all because you think your faith is threatened by evolution.

525 posted on 01/02/2005 9:47:01 AM PST by WildHorseCrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 443 | View Replies]

To: WildHorseCrash; balrog666; VadeRetro; longshadow
Creationists have something in common with toilet-bathers. They each do different things, of course, but each engages in disgusting behavior. Creationists cling to demonstrated untruths, and toilet-bathers ... well, you can figure it out. When you catch them at it, and point out what they're doing, they don't care. It's hard to believe, but somehow exposure makes no change in their behavior. They literally can't be shamed. I think in both cases, they do it because they actually enjoy the shame.
526 posted on 01/02/2005 10:13:36 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; jennyp
The only question is, what are they transitioning into?

Nightmares tonight

527 posted on 01/02/2005 12:31:50 PM PST by RightWingNilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Dr. Eckleburg; bondserv; AndrewC
Interesting post. Also, I am not ashamed that I know that my redeemer liveth : for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.

Your empty Christian hating faith will bring you nothing, ever

528 posted on 01/02/2005 2:55:03 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin; PatrickHenry
Also, I am not ashamed that I know that my redeemer liveth: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day...Your empty Christian hating faith will bring you nothing, ever.

Amen, d'ed. And Happy New Year, by the grace of God alone.

"These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." -- John 16:33.

Amazing how many cheerful Christians there are in the world among the puckered, dissolute and bitter masses.

We advance by God's will alone.

529 posted on 01/02/2005 3:31:41 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin
"They are true believers and have no disagreements. The reason for this is that they know the theory is true. When believers know that strongly that something is true they don't question it. (Notice how absolutely no proponent of evolution here, ever questions even one little thing about it.) And "when you don't question it, you're living by faith, not by science."(Ian Stewart, quoted from Does God Play Dice? The Mathematics of Chaos) For these people here, few of them scientists, mind you, they are defending dogma"

I only play with the unserious one-armed boat rowers for so long and then it gets boring going in circles.

I hopped out of their boats over 30 posts ago. LOL

530 posted on 01/02/2005 8:13:19 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Today's DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
The Bible teaches that death is a foreigner, a condition superimposed upon humans and nature after creation.

It sure seems to me, that ternal life should have "evolved" by now, as it is sure simpler to STAY living than to go thru the process of reproduction.........


531 posted on 01/02/2005 8:29:45 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Hey!

You ain't the guy on WKRP who thought turkeys could FLY are you????


532 posted on 01/02/2005 8:35:17 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

But.. it ain't whether you win or lose; but how you play the game that counts.


533 posted on 01/02/2005 8:37:15 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

ternal????



E-ternal


534 posted on 01/02/2005 8:40:23 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
The Bible teaches that death is a foreigner, a condition superimposed upon humans and nature after creation.

2 Corinthians 2:14-17
 
But thanks be to God, who always leads us in triumphal procession in Christ and through us
spreads everywhere the fragrance of the knowledge of him.  For we are to God the aroma of Christ
among those who are being saved and those who are perishing.  
To the one we are the smell of death; to the other, the fragrance of life.
And who is equal to such a task?  
Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit.
On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.

535 posted on 01/02/2005 8:47:20 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

You make such profound statements. LOL


536 posted on 01/02/2005 9:32:09 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Today's DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

bump!


537 posted on 01/02/2005 9:35:10 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Today's DemocRATS are either religious moral relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Moses was divinely inspired. The concepts/laws/ideas given to him were the major catalysing force of human history.


538 posted on 01/02/2005 9:40:15 PM PST by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Now that makes quite a bit of sense to me and can understand it to be true.


539 posted on 01/02/2005 9:58:32 PM PST by skylight4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Now will come the Flood of Hammiburi (SP?) stuff that came BEFORE Moses, etal.


540 posted on 01/03/2005 5:17:02 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540541-549 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson