Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

For the sake of some interesting conversation here, is it at all POSSIBLE that the use of heavy explosives underground could set off an earthquake (i.e. underground testing of nuclear weapons)?

BTW, I'm a conservative and NOT an environmentalist. I'm just interested in hearing opinions here if anyone here is knowledgeable in geology.


41 posted on 12/29/2004 5:45:02 AM PST by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Muzzle_em

It's possible. But one would have to know where the most stress is on the fault. Even if you were able to know that, you would need to know alot about the surrounding geology.

I've done alot of exploding of stuff underground. And no matter how many times you've done it before, logic and experience are almost useless. The rock breaks and shears the way the rock wants to break and shear.

It's utterly amazing what you see down there. The types of rocks (even in an igneous/amorphic zone like we're working in) is incredible. And the shears where whole faces of rock disappear or have been shifted out of site are amazing.

I'm talking slates/quartzites/andesites/granedosites (and even limestone) near Yosemite.
And a tiny, tiny amount of gold/silver/molybdenum.


48 posted on 12/29/2004 5:59:24 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Muzzle_em
The earthquake was at least 6 miles beneath the crust (I also remember a 40 km depth being mentioned). Also, the quake moved a section of crust longer than Oklahoma over 100 yards.

I seem to remember a guy proposing that we set off explosives to help the San Andreas fault relieve strain in a series of very small quakes, rather than store up strain for a giant quake. Couldn't be done, not enough bombs in the world, couldn't get them deep enough, etc. Very quickly debunked by real geophysicists.

Next to the raw power of the planet, all of man's explosives are little more than bubbles in the tub, so to speak.

55 posted on 12/29/2004 6:36:37 AM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Muzzle_em

The epicenter of this particular quake, caused by the Indo-Aussi plate diving under the European one at a rate of 6cm a year was 6 miles down under the ocean. While theoretically possible in exactly the right area, using exactly the right explosives, it's not bloody likely. This is a planet we live on, not a soap bubble. The region gets hit by major quakes and major tsunamis that kill thousands every few years. These things happen when the surface you live on happens to be floating around on an extremely hot, dense ocean of molten rock.


64 posted on 12/29/2004 8:59:17 AM PST by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson