"Every candidate that Clinton endorsed, raised money for, or conducted a campaign appearance on behalf of, lost. Toss up Senate races in which Clinton appeared all went against the Democrats . . . . In swing states where Clinton put in appearances, such as Arizona and his home state of Arkansas, Kerry also lost." Can't argue with that!
1 posted on
12/26/2004 8:07:50 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: wagglebee
"Every candidate that Clinton endorsed, raised money for, or conducted a campaign appearance on behalf of, lost. Toss up Senate races in which Clinton appeared all went against the Democrats . . . . In swing states where Clinton put in appearances, such as Arizona and his home state of Arkansas, Kerry also lost." Can't argue with that!
Is that why the lefties call him the big dawg? Beause of the big mess he leaves behind? LOL!
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
3 posted on
12/26/2004 8:12:41 PM PST by
amom
To: wagglebee
The Clinton Curse continues. Clinton has run out of steam since he left office. In fact the Clinton Curse started while he was in office. He presided over the biggest and for now the most terrible and humiliating defeat the Democrats have ever had, the 1994 Congressional Races and it has been downhill from there.
On one hand Clinton is all the Dems have and on the other is the biggest Albatross around their neck they have. We can only hope Clinton sticks around for at least a few more election cycles until he truly becomes a parody of himself.
To: wagglebee
The ultimate example of one of the core Dem flaws, failure to assume any responsibility - In this case they can't shift blame to W or other Reps so they do the next best thing - Blame other Dems. A fun-to-watch feeding frenzy.
5 posted on
12/26/2004 8:14:32 PM PST by
drt1
To: wagglebee
"Every candidate that Clinton endorsed, raised money for, or conducted a campaign appearance on behalf of, lost." Can't wait for him to hit the road for Hillary!
6 posted on
12/26/2004 8:14:45 PM PST by
JennysCool
(QuarkXPress has caused an error in QuarkXPress. QuarkXPress will now close.)
To: wagglebee
To: wagglebee
Every candidate that Clinton endorsed, raised money for, or conducted a campaign appearance on behalf of, lost. Toss up Senate races in which Clinton appeared all went against the Democrats . . . . In swing states where Clinton put in appearances, such as Arizona and his home state of Arkansas, Kerry also lost.
It is called "reverse Midas touch" and "having a brown finger"
8 posted on
12/26/2004 8:16:19 PM PST by
GSlob
To: wagglebee
You can argue whether Cahill or Clinton did more to damage Kerry's campaign. But the bottom line is that Kerry is incompetent to tie his own shoelaces. He can't run a campaign, far less a country.
He's very good at marrying rich women and spending their money, but that seems to be the extent of his talents.
9 posted on
12/26/2004 8:16:36 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: wagglebee
Clinton, the king of corruption speaks.
11 posted on
12/26/2004 8:19:56 PM PST by
Bullish
To: wagglebee
"Every candidate that Clinton endorsed, raised money for, or conducted a campaign appearance on behalf of, lost. Toss up Senate races in which Clinton appeared all went against the Democrats . . . . In swing states where Clinton put in appearances, such as Arizona and his home state of Arkansas, Kerry also lost."
This is good enough to be someone's signature
14 posted on
12/26/2004 8:23:13 PM PST by
Vision
("We ride, never worry 'bout the fall. I guess that's just the cowboy in us all")
To: wagglebee
"The Clinton team, though technically skillful, could not see reality..."Uh...that was definitely a problem with John Kerry and his looney supporters, and it's a fundamental problem of the Democrat Party--in fact, of the entire Left. On the other hand, the Clinton team sees reality rather clearly.
15 posted on
12/26/2004 8:28:13 PM PST by
Savage Beast
(This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
To: wagglebee
It is so entertaining to watch the libs feed on their own!
17 posted on
12/26/2004 8:29:52 PM PST by
FlashBack
(Faith will not make our path easy, but it will give us strength for the Journey.)
To: wagglebee
I don't get it...
Kerry lost, and Bubba is complaining? Isn't that what he wanted?
Or is he complaining that Mary Beth Cahill, and not he, is getting credit for running the Kerry campaign into the ground?
18 posted on
12/26/2004 8:31:03 PM PST by
kdmhcdcfld
(Any rebroadcast of this tagline without the express written consent of FreeRepublic is prohibited.)
To: wagglebee
BJ will get this turned around when he runs his Lesbian Wife!
Pray for W and Our Troops
21 posted on
12/26/2004 8:34:20 PM PST by
bray
(The First of 4 More Years!)
To: wagglebee
I will argue with it. Unless you want to classify Pennsylvania as a non battleground swing state. Bill Clinton appeared there with Kerry and he won that state.
25 posted on
12/26/2004 8:37:12 PM PST by
xp38
To: wagglebee
For guy that won only 43% of the votes in 1992, and only 48% of the votes in 1996, Clinton has a lot of room to talk.
Kerry achieved a higher percentage than Clinton, and beat his vote totals by a wide margin.
Leave it to Clinton to spin something. Has the guy ever addressed reality?
26 posted on
12/26/2004 8:39:16 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservat)
To: wagglebee
"When Carville and Greenberg tell reporters that the campaign was missing a defining narrative, they forget that they were the ones insisting we had to keep beating the domestic-issues drum," Kerry brother-in-law David Thorne griped to columnist Arianna Huffington last month. Nice post, but I disagree with your choice of star paragraphs. I consider the above to be the champ!
32 posted on
12/26/2004 8:50:32 PM PST by
j_tull
(To all my Christophobic friends, "Merry Christmas!")
To: wagglebee
Kerry campaign aides are reportedly bitter about the bum political advice they got from top Clintonistas James Carville and Stan Greenberg - not to mention the ex-prez himself. Ha ha! Let the blind lead the blind. (they will both fall in the ditch).
34 posted on
12/26/2004 8:53:35 PM PST by
Jorge
To: wagglebee
LOL!! sKerry and company's stupidity is just unbelievable!
Even now they can't see that Xlinton gave sKerry exactly what Xlinton wanted sKerry to have: a defeat and a clear runway for The Hildabeaste in 2008.
sKerry couldn't see that coming? Now I'm REALLY glad he lost :)
36 posted on
12/26/2004 8:55:50 PM PST by
upchuck
(I support the right of leftists to damage their credibility by saying stupid things out loud. MAdams)
To: wagglebee
I still don't see why the Democrats keep treating him as a rock star with his record. Its been a decade since he lost Congress on his watch and no Democrat he's endorsed, helped to raise money for or for whom he campaigned actively has won! You'd think they'd be giving him the cold shoulder by now.
37 posted on
12/26/2004 8:56:17 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson