Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUMATRA QUAKE REVISED TO 9.0 MAG
usgs ^

Posted on 12/26/2004 3:30:18 PM PST by Brian Mosely

Magnitude 9.0 - OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
2004 December 26 00:58:50 UTC

Preliminary Earthquake Report
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver

A great earthquake occurred at 00:58:50 (UTC) on Sunday, December 26, 2004. The magnitude 9.0 event has been located OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

Small globe showing earthquake

Small map showing earthquake

Magnitude

9.0
Date-Time Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 00:58:50 (UTC)
= Coordinated Universal Time
Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 6:58:50 AM
= local time at epicenter


Location 3.298°N, 95.779°E

Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
Region

OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
Distances
250 km (155 miles) SSE of Banda Aceh, Sumatra, Indonesia

320 km (200 miles) W of Medan, Sumatra, Indonesia
1260 km (780 miles) SSW of BANGKOK, Thailand
1605 km (1000 miles) NW of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 9.2 km (5.7 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters Nst=157, Nph=157, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.35 sec, Gp= 29°,

M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9

Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)

Event ID usslav
Felt Reports At least 3,000 people killed in Sri Lanka, 2,300 in India, 2,000 in Indonesia, 289 in Thailand, 42 in Malaysia, 8 in Somalia and 2 in Bangladesh by tsunamis. Tsunamis also occurred on the coasts of Maldives and Cocos Island. At least 200 people killed, buildings destroyed or damaged in the Banda Aceh area, Sumatra. Felt widely in Sumatra. Also felt in Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore and Thailand. This is now the fourth largest earthquake in the world since 1900 and is the largest since the 1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska earthquake.

Today's shallow, thrust-type earthquake occurred off the west coast of northern Sumatra at the interface between the India and Burma plates. In this region, the Burma plate is characterized by significant strain partitioning due to oblique convergence of the India and Australia plates to the west and the Sunda and Eurasian plates to the east. Off the west coast of northern Sumatra, the India plate is moving in a northeastward direction at about 5 cm per year relative to the Burma plate. Preliminary locations of larger aftershocks following today's earthquake show that approximately 1000 km of the plate boundary slipped as a result of the earthquake. Aftershocks are distributed along much of the shallow plate boundary between northern Sumatra (approximately 3 degrees north) to near Andaman Island (at about 14 degrees north).



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earthquake; sumatra; sumatraquake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-316 next last
To: KoRn

Contact the USGS in Boulder, CO.


121 posted on 12/26/2004 4:35:27 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

I'm glad he is safe and had his timing down. Just shows you how a week or two can make a difference to your life.


122 posted on 12/26/2004 4:37:38 PM PST by U S Army EOD (John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: brigette

That is a marvelous pix.. even with my OLD 13" monitor. thanks


123 posted on 12/26/2004 4:38:56 PM PST by DollyCali (ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

The Ten Largest1 Earthquakes of the 20th Century

Location Date Magnitude2
1. Chile May 22, 1960 9.5
2. Prince William Sound, Alaska March 28, 19643 9.2
3. Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands March 9, 1957 9.1
4. Kamchatka Nov. 4, 1952 9.0
5. Off the coast of Ecuador Jan. 31, 1906 8.8
6. Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands Feb. 4, 1965 8.7
7. India-China border Aug. 15, 1950 8.6
8. Kamchatka Feb. 3, 1923 8.5
9. Banda Sea, Indonesia Feb. 1, 1938 8.5
10. Kuril Islands Oct. 13, 1963 8.5
Source: National Earthquake Information Center, U.S. Geological Survey.
 

Deadliest Earthquakes on Record

(50,000 deaths or more)

Date Location Deaths Magnitude
Jan. 23, 1556 Shansi, China 830,000 n.a.
July 27, 1976 Tangshan, China 255,0001 8.0
Aug. 9, 1138 Aleppo, Syria 230,000 n.a.
May 22, 1927 near Xining, China 200,000 8.3
Dec. 22, 8562 Damghan, Iran 200,000 n.a.
Dec. 16, 1920 Gansu, China 200,000 8.6
March 23, 8932 Ardabil, Iran 150,000 n.a.
Sept. 1, 1923 Kwanto, Japan 143,000 8.3
Oct. 5, 1948 Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, USSR 110,000 7.3
Dec. 28, 1908 Messina, Italy 70,000–
100,0003
7.5
Sept. 1290 Chihli, China 100,000 n.a.
Nov. 1667 Shemakha, Caucasia  80,000 n.a.
Nov. 18, 1727 Tabriz, Iran  77,000 n.a.
Nov. 1, 1755 Lisbon, Portugal  70,000 8.7
Dec. 25, 1932 Gansu, China  70,000 7.6
May 31, 1970 Peru  66,000 7.8
12684 Silicia, Asia Minor  60,000 n.a.
Jan. 11, 1693 Sicily, Italy  60,000 n.a.
May 30, 1935 Quetta, Pakistan  30,000–
 60,000
7.5
Feb. 4, 1783 Calabria, Italy  50,000 n.a.
June 20, 1990 Iran  50,000 7.7
Source: National Earthquake Information Center, U.S. Geological Survey. Data compiled from several sources.

124 posted on 12/26/2004 4:39:35 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

Is the Richter Scale a logarithmic scale? Is a 9.0 ten times the blast of an 8.0?


125 posted on 12/26/2004 4:39:43 PM PST by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: missyme
I agree CA is way over-due....I think a 9.0 would definetly cause San Francisco to become an Island

The San Andreas is physically incapable of generating a mag 9.0 quake. Magnitude is a pretty basic function of the length and surface area of fault ruptured. SA is a strike-slip fault and simply not long enough to generate above a low 8.

The Cascadia subduction zone off Washington and Oregon and Northern California, is, however, capable of generating a 9.

126 posted on 12/26/2004 4:40:12 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
I guess I don't understand the dynamics of the Tsunami.. if East Coast of Africa has been hit & these tidal waves go out concentrically from the earthquake, How could Garcia been missed? I am glad it was (hopefully) but must not really understand this
127 posted on 12/26/2004 4:41:46 PM PST by DollyCali (ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
"The San Andreas is physically incapable of generating a mag 9.0 quake.",p>Do you have any information on the New Madrid fault?
128 posted on 12/26/2004 4:43:12 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All

some Diego Garcia Message Yahoo Groups...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diego_Garcia_BIOT/?yguid=188954506

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/usnavalstationdiegogarcia/


129 posted on 12/26/2004 4:43:40 PM PST by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Didn't the wave hit west Africa this afternoon? Were they able to evacuate?


130 posted on 12/26/2004 4:43:48 PM PST by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

Actually what is being used now is called Moment Magnitude, not the Richter scale.

A 9.0 has 10 times the ground motion of an 8...

However, that's not energy per se.

A 9.0 has THIRTY TWO times the ENERGY of an 8.0. Each increase of 1 in Moment magnitude is 32 times the seismic energy.


131 posted on 12/26/2004 4:45:08 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali
I think out in open water a tsunami is only a few inches in height, but as it approaches shallow areas near a coast it builds to enormous proportions.
132 posted on 12/26/2004 4:46:05 PM PST by commonguymd (the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali

The nature of the sea floor matters a lot..you can get odd little reflections and shadows for seismic waves.


133 posted on 12/26/2004 4:46:11 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla; ProudVet77; 7.62 x 51mm

"Okay, so now what®?"


"Mt St Helens, while not associated with these quakes, appears ready to go"


Godzilla, A penny for your thoughts...is real estate around Seattle about to take a dive?


134 posted on 12/26/2004 4:48:52 PM PST by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I would suppose it's impossible to generate a 9 off New Mardrid as well.

The fault zone doesn't seem nearly long enough to generate one.

There's been a lot of recent scholarship trying to guess the size of the big New Madrid quakes of the early 1800s. It seems a lot of the numbers thrown around for them may have been inflated; a few people are arguing that none of the quakes were above m 8.

However, because the crust is in such good shape generally in the Midwest, seismic energy really moves much further there than in, say, California. You'll have MUCH more damage 100 miles from a M 7 quake in Missouri than you would 100 miles from an identical M 7 quake in California.


135 posted on 12/26/2004 4:49:02 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali
You are correct, Africa was hit some time ago, Diego was passed over many hours before that. Numerous mentions of the Maldives (much closer) having only a 1.3 meter swell. The location of the Diego base, on the Southwest portion of the atoll, most likely protected it from any major damage coming for the north east.
136 posted on 12/26/2004 4:49:29 PM PST by Slicksadick (Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church

There's been no discernable change in activity at Mount St. Helens since this quake.

There's been no elevation in world-wide volcanic activity.

This won't necessarily lead to much of...anything.


137 posted on 12/26/2004 4:50:10 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: U S Army EOD
Tet 68, we broke the VCs back; they were still around and nasty little MFs but no longer a formidable force.

68-70 Air War put the NVNAF where it belonged, on the ground or in caves.

I was out of there summer of 71 and so were the I Corps Marines.

72 Easter offensive was Vo Nguyen Giap's big mistake. Nice try but his army got their asses kicked. You'll only hear this once from me but Bravo Zulu, Army!

BIGLOOK. VQ-1, USN

138 posted on 12/26/2004 4:53:13 PM PST by BIGLOOK (I once opposed keelhauling but have recently come to my senses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
"You'll have MUCH more damage 100 miles from a M 7 quake in Missouri than you would 100 miles from an identical M 7 quake in California."

That would not be good news here in St. Louis. I do appreciate the information.

139 posted on 12/26/2004 4:53:25 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd; Strategerist

I am guessing by it's shape DG is a former volcano "top" and so does NOT have the shallow waters to set up the "hit".. I did read earlier on another thread how the tidal waves are very regular wave like in the open sea.


140 posted on 12/26/2004 4:53:33 PM PST by DollyCali (ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson