Skip to comments.
SUMATRA QUAKE REVISED TO 9.0 MAG
usgs ^
Posted on 12/26/2004 3:30:18 PM PST by Brian Mosely
Magnitude 9.0 - OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA
2004 December 26 00:58:50 UTC
Preliminary Earthquake Report
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver
A great earthquake occurred at 00:58:50 (UTC) on Sunday, December 26, 2004. The magnitude 9.0 event has been located OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnitude |
|
9.0 |
Date-Time |
Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 00:58:50 (UTC) = Coordinated Universal Time Sunday, December 26, 2004 at 6:58:50 AM = local time at epicenter
|
Location |
3.298°N, 95.779°E |
|
Depth |
10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program |
Region |
|
OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA |
Distances |
250 km (155 miles) SSE of Banda Aceh, Sumatra, Indonesia
320 km (200 miles) W of Medan, Sumatra, Indonesia 1260 km (780 miles) SSW of BANGKOK, Thailand 1605 km (1000 miles) NW of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia
|
|
Location Uncertainty |
horizontal +/- 9.2 km (5.7 miles); depth fixed by location program |
Parameters |
Nst=157, Nph=157, Dmin=>999 km, Rmss=1.35 sec, Gp= 29°,
M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=9 |
Source |
USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
|
|
Event ID |
usslav |
Felt Reports |
At least 3,000 people killed in Sri Lanka, 2,300 in India, 2,000 in Indonesia, 289 in Thailand, 42 in Malaysia, 8 in Somalia and 2 in Bangladesh by tsunamis. Tsunamis also occurred on the coasts of Maldives and Cocos Island. At least 200 people killed, buildings destroyed or damaged in the Banda Aceh area, Sumatra. Felt widely in Sumatra. Also felt in Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore and Thailand. This is now the fourth largest earthquake in the world since 1900 and is the largest since the 1964 Prince William Sound, Alaska earthquake. |
|
|
Today's shallow, thrust-type earthquake occurred off the west coast of northern Sumatra at the interface between the India and Burma plates. In this region, the Burma plate is characterized by significant strain partitioning due to oblique convergence of the India and Australia plates to the west and the Sunda and Eurasian plates to the east. Off the west coast of northern Sumatra, the India plate is moving in a northeastward direction at about 5 cm per year relative to the Burma plate. Preliminary locations of larger aftershocks following today's earthquake show that approximately 1000 km of the plate boundary slipped as a result of the earthquake. Aftershocks are distributed along much of the shallow plate boundary between northern Sumatra (approximately 3 degrees north) to near Andaman Island (at about 14 degrees north).
|
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earthquake; sumatra; sumatraquake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 301-316 next last
To: KoRn
Contact the USGS in Boulder, CO.
121
posted on
12/26/2004 4:35:27 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Ciexyz
I'm glad he is safe and had his timing down. Just shows you how a week or two can make a difference to your life.
122
posted on
12/26/2004 4:37:38 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(John Kerry, the mother of all flip floppers.I)
To: brigette
That is a marvelous pix.. even with my OLD 13" monitor. thanks
123
posted on
12/26/2004 4:38:56 PM PST
by
DollyCali
(ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
To: Brian Mosely
Location |
Date |
Magnitude2 |
1. |
Chile |
May 22, 1960 |
9.5 |
2. |
Prince William Sound, Alaska |
March 28, 19643 |
9.2 |
3. |
Andreanof Islands, Aleutian Islands |
March 9, 1957 |
9.1 |
4. |
Kamchatka |
Nov. 4, 1952 |
9.0 |
5. |
Off the coast of Ecuador |
Jan. 31, 1906 |
8.8 |
6. |
Rat Islands, Aleutian Islands |
Feb. 4, 1965 |
8.7 |
7. |
India-China border |
Aug. 15, 1950 |
8.6 |
8. |
Kamchatka |
Feb. 3, 1923 |
8.5 |
9. |
Banda Sea, Indonesia |
Feb. 1, 1938 |
8.5 |
10. |
Kuril Islands |
Oct. 13, 1963 |
8.5 |
Source: National Earthquake Information Center, U.S. Geological Survey.
(50,000 deaths or more)
Date |
Location |
Deaths |
Magnitude |
Jan. 23, 1556 |
Shansi, China |
830,000 |
n.a. |
July 27, 1976 |
Tangshan, China |
255,0001 |
8.0 |
Aug. 9, 1138 |
Aleppo, Syria |
230,000 |
n.a. |
May 22, 1927 |
near Xining, China |
200,000 |
8.3 |
Dec. 22, 8562 |
Damghan, Iran |
200,000 |
n.a. |
Dec. 16, 1920 |
Gansu, China |
200,000 |
8.6 |
March 23, 8932 |
Ardabil, Iran |
150,000 |
n.a. |
Sept. 1, 1923 |
Kwanto, Japan |
143,000 |
8.3 |
Oct. 5, 1948 |
Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, USSR |
110,000 |
7.3 |
Dec. 28, 1908 |
Messina, Italy |
70,000 100,0003 |
7.5 |
Sept. 1290 |
Chihli, China |
100,000 |
n.a. |
Nov. 1667 |
Shemakha, Caucasia |
80,000 |
n.a. |
Nov. 18, 1727 |
Tabriz, Iran |
77,000 |
n.a. |
Nov. 1, 1755 |
Lisbon, Portugal |
70,000 |
8.7 |
Dec. 25, 1932 |
Gansu, China |
70,000 |
7.6 |
May 31, 1970 |
Peru |
66,000 |
7.8 |
12684 |
Silicia, Asia Minor |
60,000 |
n.a. |
Jan. 11, 1693 |
Sicily, Italy |
60,000 |
n.a. |
May 30, 1935 |
Quetta, Pakistan |
30,000 60,000 |
7.5 |
Feb. 4, 1783 |
Calabria, Italy |
50,000 |
n.a. |
June 20, 1990 |
Iran |
50,000 |
7.7 |
Source: National Earthquake Information Center, U.S. Geological Survey. Data compiled from several sources.
|
124
posted on
12/26/2004 4:39:35 PM PST
by
TomGuy
(America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
To: fhayek
Is the Richter Scale a logarithmic scale? Is a 9.0 ten times the blast of an 8.0?
125
posted on
12/26/2004 4:39:43 PM PST
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: missyme
I agree CA is way over-due....I think a 9.0 would definetly cause San Francisco to become an Island
The San Andreas is physically incapable of generating a mag 9.0 quake. Magnitude is a pretty basic function of the length and surface area of fault ruptured. SA is a strike-slip fault and simply not long enough to generate above a low 8.
The Cascadia subduction zone off Washington and Oregon and Northern California, is, however, capable of generating a 9.
To: commonguymd
I guess I don't understand the dynamics of the Tsunami.. if East Coast of Africa has been hit & these tidal waves go out concentrically from the earthquake, How could Garcia been missed? I am glad it was (hopefully) but must not really understand this
127
posted on
12/26/2004 4:41:46 PM PST
by
DollyCali
(ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
To: Strategerist
"The San Andreas is physically incapable of generating a mag 9.0 quake.",p>Do you have any information on the New Madrid fault?
128
posted on
12/26/2004 4:43:12 PM PST
by
Bahbah
To: All
To: GSlob
Didn't the wave hit west Africa this afternoon? Were they able to evacuate?
130
posted on
12/26/2004 4:43:48 PM PST
by
gitmo
(Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
To: gitmo
Actually what is being used now is called Moment Magnitude, not the Richter scale.
A 9.0 has 10 times the ground motion of an 8...
However, that's not energy per se.
A 9.0 has THIRTY TWO times the ENERGY of an 8.0. Each increase of 1 in Moment magnitude is 32 times the seismic energy.
To: DollyCali
I think out in open water a tsunami is only a few inches in height, but as it approaches shallow areas near a coast it builds to enormous proportions.
132
posted on
12/26/2004 4:46:05 PM PST
by
commonguymd
(the commonguy's corner bar blogspot - http://commonguyva.blogspot.com)
To: DollyCali
The nature of the sea floor matters a lot..you can get odd little reflections and shadows for seismic waves.
To: Godzilla; ProudVet77; 7.62 x 51mm
"Okay, so now what®?"
"Mt St Helens, while not associated with these quakes, appears ready to go"
Godzilla, A penny for your thoughts...is real estate around Seattle about to take a dive?
To: Bahbah
I would suppose it's impossible to generate a 9 off New Mardrid as well.
The fault zone doesn't seem nearly long enough to generate one.
There's been a lot of recent scholarship trying to guess the size of the big New Madrid quakes of the early 1800s. It seems a lot of the numbers thrown around for them may have been inflated; a few people are arguing that none of the quakes were above m 8.
However, because the crust is in such good shape generally in the Midwest, seismic energy really moves much further there than in, say, California. You'll have MUCH more damage 100 miles from a M 7 quake in Missouri than you would 100 miles from an identical M 7 quake in California.
To: DollyCali
You are correct, Africa was hit some time ago, Diego was passed over many hours before that. Numerous mentions of the Maldives (much closer) having only a 1.3 meter swell. The location of the Diego base, on the Southwest portion of the atoll, most likely protected it from any major damage coming for the north east.
136
posted on
12/26/2004 4:49:29 PM PST
by
Slicksadick
(Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
To: Domestic Church
There's been no discernable change in activity at Mount St. Helens since this quake.
There's been no elevation in world-wide volcanic activity.
This won't necessarily lead to much of...anything.
To: U S Army EOD
Tet 68, we broke the VCs back; they were still around and nasty little MFs but no longer a formidable force.
68-70 Air War put the NVNAF where it belonged, on the ground or in caves.
I was out of there summer of 71 and so were the I Corps Marines.
72 Easter offensive was Vo Nguyen Giap's big mistake. Nice try but his army got their asses kicked. You'll only hear this once from me but Bravo Zulu, Army!
BIGLOOK. VQ-1, USN
138
posted on
12/26/2004 4:53:13 PM PST
by
BIGLOOK
(I once opposed keelhauling but have recently come to my senses.)
To: Strategerist
"You'll have MUCH more damage 100 miles from a M 7 quake in Missouri than you would 100 miles from an identical M 7 quake in California."That would not be good news here in St. Louis. I do appreciate the information.
139
posted on
12/26/2004 4:53:25 PM PST
by
Bahbah
To: commonguymd; Strategerist
I am guessing by it's shape DG is a former volcano "top" and so does NOT have the shallow waters to set up the "hit".. I did read earlier on another thread how the tidal waves are very regular wave like in the open sea.
140
posted on
12/26/2004 4:53:33 PM PST
by
DollyCali
(ChristMAS - there is really "MAS" in Christ.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 301-316 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson