Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

She immigrated, they married; then INS called
St. Petersburg Times ^ | December 23, 2004 | SAUNDRA AMRHEIN, Times Staff Writer| Times researcher Cathy Wos contributed to this story

Posted on 12/25/2004 8:10:27 PM PST by AM2000

A hitch in bureaucracy threatens a woman's green card application - and the couple's life plans.

TAMPA - Lynda and Michael Arazie had a new car, a new house, and they were expecting an adopted baby to arrive in a few months.

But in early December, Lynda Arazie, 33, got a call that threatened to upend the life they were building.

Her work permit had been yanked, her attorney told her. Worse yet, immigration officials canceled her application for a green card, or permanent residence visa, because she and her husband missed an interview in November.

She could be deported back to Australia.

How could that be? she demanded. She and her husband, a St. Petersburg firefighter, had filled out all the proper paperwork.

When they moved from St. Petersburg to their new four-bedroom house in Riverview in January, she'd sent two notices of the new address to the immigration office.

Even so, she discovered that an immigration official had sent a letter about the interview to the old address. It was a bureaucratic error in a massive government agency. And suddenly the Arazies' world was crashing down.

"She lost her job, she's illegal now," Michael Arazie, 36, said this week. "She can't work now. We have a mortgage. We have a car payment. We have bills. . . . We did everything above and beyond and it's still not okay," he said.

Would immigration own up to its mistake?

Three days before Christmas, the couple would have their answer.

An international romance

Michael Arazie was tired of the local dating scene.

Born and raised in St. Petersburg, Arazie, a firefighter-paramedic for the city, couldn't find anyone with whom he really clicked.

He branched out on the Internet. Long drawn to Australia from educational television programs, he put his cursor on the country logo while visiting an online dating service.

Lynda Arazie remembers her attraction to American men. They seemed to be such "gentlemen." The two found each other online in May 2002, and never stopped talking.

Lynda visited Florida that fall. Michael met her at the airport with flowers. They went to Outback Steakhouse. They chased squirrels - something Lynda had never seen - in Phillippe Park in Safety Harbor. The two married there in March 2003.

That same month, Lynda applied for a green card as the wife of a U.S. citizen.

Three months later she got a work permit and took a job as an administrative assistant for financial advisers in Tampa.

The two found a dream house in Riverview: a four-bedroom, two-story home fronting a lake for about $150,000. They moved there in January and sent a change-of-address form through overnight mail to immigration officials in Tampa. They followed up with a phone call, and were told everything was fine. They applied to adopt a child.

Life went on as normal. The pair bought a 2005 Ford Escape for their growing family.

And then they got the call.

"You have to start over'

The letter arrived in attorney Charles Samaha's office Dec. 8 from Immigration.

He'd received a notice weeks earlier about their appointment for an interview on Nov. 10, he said. The interview is typically the last step before the immigrant receives a green card, or permanent residency, he said. The officials ask questions and look through leases, mortgages and taxes to make sure the marriage is legitimate.

Samaha said he tried to call the couple to tell them about the appointment, but the number he had for them no longer worked.

Lynda Arazie said she never told Samaha about the new address and phone number because she assumed his job of preparing their initial paperwork was over.

When he got the letter on Dec. 8 that said Lynda's case was canceled, Samaha tracked the couple down through one of their relatives in the phone book.

When Samaha finally reached her, Lynda told her boss the situation, and was told she had to resolve the situation before continuing to work there. She left the office and went home, and the couple called a toll-free immigration number.

"My biggest concern was that I wasn't allowed to work," she said.

How could they afford the house, the SUV, the new baby about to arrive?

Officials told her they couldn't help. She and Michael would have to make another appointment with the Tampa office - online.

"They said you have to start over," Michael Arazie said.

That could take another 18 months, and possibly another $800 to $1,000. Plus, Lynda would have to wait for another work permit, likely to take three months.

"It's hard to get a hold of anybody," Lynda Arazie fumed.

"You can't talk to anybody in charge," Michael Arazie added.

They made an appointment online for Dec. 20. Meanwhile, Samaha e-mailed and phoned officials, but got no response.

"It's almost Christmas, and she's not working," said Michael Arazie, who began taking on overtime shifts, including Christmas, for extra income. "We're wondering how we're going to survive."

Defeated and desperate

At the meeting on Monday, the immigration official seemed irritated, the couple said.

There was nothing she could do, she told them.

They returned home, defeated and desperate, fearing the adoption might fall through.

"I wanted to tell her where to go, but you can't because they got your life in their hands," Lynda Arazie said. "I thought I did everything right."

It turns out, she did.

Kristen Holland, acting officer in charge of the office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in Tampa, looked into the case after being contacted by a St. Petersburg Times reporter this week.

An immigration supervisor in Tampa had rectified the Arazie case on Dec. 16, four days before the couple's unsuccessful meeting with a different immigration official, Holland said Wednesday.

"I don't know who they spoke to," Holland said. But she acknowledged the mistake belonged to the immigration office.

"When we make an error, we fix it," she said. The office handles thousands of cases a year and sometimes flubs because "we're human," she added. Lynda Arazie can work again, too, she said.

Contacted by phone with the update, Michael Arazie was almost speechless. "Oh, wow," he said. "Oh, wow. That's super news."

The immigration office is in the process of sending out another notice for a new appointment, an interview like the one the couple missed on Nov. 10. This time, Holland said, the notice will go to the Riverview address.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: aliens; bcis; cis; immigrantlist; immigration; ins; uscis; visa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

1 posted on 12/25/2004 8:10:28 PM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AM2000
How could that be? she demanded.

Easy, she is Australian and not of the correct skin color (she's white). Immigration has orders to ignore immigrants, legal or not of Latino or Central American Indian descent, so the government bureaucrats have to concentrate on being a$$holes to other people.

2 posted on 12/25/2004 8:22:53 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

That's a glib and incorrect response. The author of this article hit on the correct answer to your question, however - the bureacracy. It's massive and it makes tons of mistakes. And dealing with the USCIS (formerly INS) is very very frustrating because no one ever seems to know anything. The fact that the laws keep changing, does not help matters.


3 posted on 12/25/2004 8:26:50 PM PST by AM2000 (I am not responsible for the contents of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

"Lynda Arazie remembers her attraction to American men. They seemed to be such 'gentlemen.'"

(This is meant to be funny) - "Gentlemen"? American men? Makes one wonder if this story is bogus! :-)

Seriously, I am glad they got it straigtened out.

If INS is going to harass English speaking immigrants - it should be Canadians! Australians are turning out to be some of our best allies.


4 posted on 12/25/2004 8:27:17 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
If INS is going to harass English speaking immigrants - it should be Canadians! Australians are turning out to be some of our best allies.

Oh, I'm sure the harassment isn't intentional or directed at Aussies. It's just a product of yet another massive government run bureacracy. They all need fixing.

5 posted on 12/25/2004 8:31:20 PM PST by AM2000 (I am not responsible for the contents of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Australians are turning out to be some of our best allies.



they have always been out best allies, check it out


6 posted on 12/25/2004 8:36:35 PM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
the government bureaucrats have to concentrate on being a$$holes to other people.

This is not about race. Govt. employees work for the biggest most powerful monopoly ever. As such, they don't care because they don't have to. A non monopoly business would have fired everyone involved in this case because if they did not, all their customers would leave. Here, if your customers want to leave, where are they going to go ?

People like to be little hitlers. It makes them feel good. Like the song says "everybody wants to rule the world". In business, there are competitive checks and balances. With govt. bureaucrats, there are few if any checks or balances.

Govt. is a necessary evil and the best govt. is the least govt.

7 posted on 12/25/2004 8:40:21 PM PST by staytrue (Thank you Freepers for delaying border control discussion until after Nov. 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

As Mark Twain once said, "Thank God we don't get all the government we pay for."


8 posted on 12/25/2004 8:42:10 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
It's just a product of yet another massive government run bureacracy. They all need fixing.

i.e. Downsizing....

9 posted on 12/25/2004 9:00:23 PM PST by dirtbiker (Solution for Terrorism: Nuke 'em 'till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
He branched out on the Internet.

This is where the story loses credibility.  We all know what "I am a dumbass" yields...

10 posted on 12/25/2004 9:01:54 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

Glad to see the INS is going out of it's way to screw law abiding immigrants, and equally going out of it's way to ignore illegal immigrants.


11 posted on 12/25/2004 9:08:01 PM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

The immigration people are horse butts. I adopted a couple of kids from the Philippines. I spent years doing paperwork for those %$#@#! One memorable interview was when the INS b%^$h asked me, "You adopted the 3 year old girl to be your housemaid, didn't you?"

The response from this much annoyed military officer - Why don't you haul your fat ass over to our house and look at her room before you make an accusation as stupid as that! - didn't win me any style points.

Shortly after the WTC bombings ('92?), I sent the INS a letter suggesting that I should have wrapped turbans around their little heads, stuck bombs under their little arms and had them scream "Asylum!" when they reached the airport.

Apparently, that letter got passed around - a week later (after a 3 year process!) I received a letter from a senior INS official saying to bring them in for their naturalization ceremony...


12 posted on 12/25/2004 9:09:44 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

American men probably seem like such gentlemen to her because she's comparing them with Australian men.


13 posted on 12/25/2004 9:12:05 PM PST by voteconstitutionparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtbiker
i.e. Downsizing....

They need complete restructuring. More e-filing, fewer people who do the manual crap of putting files together and takign them apart, and more people to do the actual interviews and adjudication.

14 posted on 12/25/2004 9:13:39 PM PST by AM2000 (I am not responsible for the contents of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AM2000

You would not believe the crap I had to put up with for the INS and green card for Mrs. Ikka. Once you get past the first 2 levels of INS bureaucracy and reach the people who TRULY know what is going on, though, you are golden.


15 posted on 12/25/2004 9:21:59 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voteconstitutionparty; Sola Veritas

"American men probably seem like such gentlemen to her because she's comparing them with Australian men."



Exactly. Aussie men don't have the best reputation in regards to treating Aussie women well.


16 posted on 12/25/2004 9:23:30 PM PST by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
No,the correct answer is that this couple did NOT do everything correctly at all and it is their own fault to assume that it was up to INS to keep track of them and they were dead wrong about not needing the immigration lawyer anymore,too. Also,since that final interview really is VERY important,why were they so bloody cavalier about it?
17 posted on 12/25/2004 9:25:49 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtbiker

Actually,this is one department where there is a huge backlog,because there are NOT enough people in it.


18 posted on 12/25/2004 9:27:43 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I agree, if I were an immigrant in another country wanting citizenship..that paperwork and dealing with them ie: making sure THEY were updated on my every move would come before
anything else.

I think immigrants need to start out expecting it is their responsibility and not just wait around because they weren't called.


19 posted on 12/25/2004 9:37:27 PM PST by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

How do you know she's white?


20 posted on 12/25/2004 9:43:53 PM PST by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson