Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
The question was why it wouldn't evolve to NOT fit.

No, the creationist's point wasn't that sensible. It really was what I said.

172 posted on 12/22/2004 3:38:26 AM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: beavus
No, the creationist's point wasn't that sensible. It really was what I said.

With all due respect, go back to message 103 and read s-l-o-w-l-y. It says "to NOT fit".

While I disagree with creationism, there's no way I want anyone's arguments or questions misrepresented. That would do us all a disservice.

BTW, any Christian geologists who are interested in fellowship with others of a similar background might be interested in the Affiliation of Christian Geologists. There are also resources at the site for non-geologists, including an "Ask a Geologist" link.

195 posted on 12/22/2004 5:14:42 AM PST by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson