Posted on 12/21/2004 10:45:08 AM PST by neverdem
New Rules Called A 'Step Backward'
Three medical associations representing pain specialists have sent the Drug Enforcement Administration an unusual joint letter sharply critical of its recently revised guidelines on prescribing pain medicines.
The letter, signed by the presidents of all three groups, called a DEA policy statement published in November in the Federal Register "an unfortunate step backward" that encourages a return to "an adversarial relationship between [doctors] and the DEA."
Already concerned about what they saw as sometimes over-aggressive prosecutions of doctors, pharmacists and other health professionals who prescribe narcotic painkillers such as OxyContin, the specialists said the new DEA position threatens their ability to provide care to millions of patients.
The presidents wrote that despite the DEA's assurances that it does not want to discourage doctors from providing proper narcotic medication to people in pain, the new guidelines "will undoubtedly have the exact opposite effect on any practitioner reading them."
DEA spokesman Bill Grant said in response that the agency "wishes to reassure the public that the withdrawal of the August [statement] does not represent any change in DEA's investigative emphasis or approach. Physicians acting in good faith and in accordance with established medical norms should remain confident that they may continue to dispense appropriate pain medications."
He said the DEA is working on a process to gather the views of the medical community as it refines its policy.
The letter from the heads of the American Pain Society (APS), the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) and the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) is a response to a Nov. 16 DEA statement that repudiated some parts of a jointly negotiated set of guidelines that had been introduced with fanfare in August.
The August guidelines -- in the form of answers to 29 frequently asked...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I can only wish these bastards a year or two of chronic pain which could be treated by drugs but won't be because of government interference.
This is one area where the federal government is flat-out wrong, and where Ashcroft's leadership was extremely poor. Doctors are already afraid to adequately treat pain, it's like the DEA has a streak of sadism running through its decisonmakers.
So non-narcotic pain relievers (Aleve, Bextra, others) will cause heart attacks and other such ailments, including liver problems, but the alternative is overly watched by the DEA?
Why do we even have prescription medicine then? To taunt and tease?
Pain is a versatile human resource management method that governments do not want to relinquish control over.
Ever.
Wars are painful, even The War On Drugs. Some have to sacrifice for a Greater Good. No pain, no gain. It's for The Children.
He probably wasn't the first but Shakespeare is often credited with the remark that "One man's meat is another man's poison."
In the '60s, biochemist Roger Williams was one of the most notable to note that human variability varied so greatly as to make gross generalizations about the study of human beings almost meaningless. The difference, he observed, between one person's miracle elixir and another's fatal dose typically was a factor of a thousand. Our most common awareness of this in normal contemporary life is that for some, milk is the "perfect food" while others will literally starve faster and die of dehydration from that consumption. Most of the latter don't because far before reaching those lethal levels, they figure out that something is drastically wrong. But those listening to the advertising instead of their actual experience may end up in the emergency rooms to learn the devastating news that they may be lactose intolerant.
That same kind of reaction is encountered with just about everything in this world. For some, apparently many, the NSAIDs are a dream come true in relieving their chronic tormenting pains -- while unsurprisingly, a few will have unfavorable reactions and outcomes.
To pronounce as safe only that which is safe to absolutely and unconditionally everyone without exception is an impossibility perpetrated by the priests and scribes of junk science, often as not, mainstream media.
While these bozos like to protest that one should not shoot the messenger but rather the message, the fact is, one can not have a greater understanding of a phenomenon than the understanding of the messenger. The charlatans of junk science exploit this fact and prey upon the gullibilities of ambitious journalists trying to make a name for themselves by distorting their misunderstanding to sensationalistic proportions, not understanding the fuller picture.
On a cycle of once a year when we've forgotten the last, we're offered the story that radio waves or microwaves destroys our DNA, causing cancers among other things -- while overlooking all the great advances in the quality of life incalculable. These purists believe we should abandon every vestige of technology and human understanding, and revert to the safety of burying our heads in the ground at every whiff of danger.
The researcher offering these proclamation of inevitable doom, are quick to add, "Nothing is conclusive yet; we'll just have to spend billions of dollars studying this more closely though. Quite conveniently, my facilities are ready to go." The newspaper editing usually omits those last provisos.
Drugs are bad. Nazis are worse.
I think the war on drugs will be still going on long after the war on terror is over.
Newbie here. I don't want to appear unsympathetic to pain but legal or illegal the treatment of non-cancer pain with those wonderful new oral opiates such as Oxcycontin has been a gold mine for the Methadone clinics and the coroners around the country. It is wonderfully addicting and creates a need for itself. You can't get better than that.
Newbie here. I don't want to appear unsympathetic to pain but legal or illegal the treatment of non-cancer pain with those wonderful new oral opiates such as Oxcycontin has been a gold mine for the Methadone clinics and the coroners around the country. It is wonderfully addicting and creates a need for itself. You can't get better than that.
There are always abuse potentials and double-edges in life. People sometimes use cars to run other people down. The question is, would you like your pain releif held hostage to vague concerns?
Purdue Pharma bamboozled the FDA into approval with bogus examples based on MS Contin. How could the FDA have not concluded in its own clinical trials that intense addiction would not lead the addict to mayhem. Dr. Art Van Zee of St. Charles Virgina is leading a movement to get Oxycontin recalled and pulled off the market.
To provide extra revenue to doctors.
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
Dr. Van Zee may be too late. The patent time has run out for Purdue and permission for cheaper knockoffs has been granted to two other companies. Everybody gonna be without
pain (or feeling).
Each year my arthritus gets a little worse. I've had 3 rotator cuff surgeries. Every disc and vert. in my neck is bad, and so surgery is off the table there. Lower back is worse. I have tried the pain clinic approach, but after a few years, I forgot what it felt like to be alive. As for the oxycontin, one of the better things was that you only had to take it every 12 hours. Didn't seem to have as many problems as the every 6 hour stuff. You don't feel as tethered to a perscription bottle or pharmacy. These doctors that abuse the system and dole out thousands of pills to a patient just screw it up for those of us with no options left on the table other than to face each minute of each day with grinding pain. You just try to hold on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.