[mhking]

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

[cyborg]

Her greatest contribution to the blogosphere was 'washingtonienne' a diary about a brat giving oral to politicians. Yes I should take her seriously!

[TexasTaysor]

"I think they did a disservice to the debate because they made the debate about the documents and not about the president of the United States."

Well....DUH

[NeoCaveman]

Wonkette Services

Alright!

[JRochelle]

I have checked out her site a few times but will never do that again.
She is a disgusting, dirty-minded wh*re. I don't get why she is a media favorite.

[Perdogg]

She's a whore. Kneepads and all.

[SE Mom]

Liberals.

Do not.

Get it.

[Navy Patriot]

Wonkette is as Wonkette does.

[68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub]

WAKE UP MAIN STREAM RIGHT WING MEDIA!

Don't be like the silent majority in the 60's and 70's
and turn your back on America and cave in to the anti war minority.
Speak up for America today!

Kerry was an illegal candidate
and is an illegal US Senator per
US Constitution 14th Amendment Section 3

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1300479/posts

Distribute these url's!

EXPOSE HANOI KERRY!

Full details on these url's!

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com

[Pylot]

Remember that in the twisted minds of the liberal glitterati it is not the guilt of the accused but the seriousness of the charges that matters.

[drt1]

This would seem, to any SANE person, to be absurd, crazy, etc. The sad part is that for a too large segment of the population this tripe is completely rational. Scary!

[Dont Mention the War]

This means so much coming from someone who's making $19,000 a year.

[Dan from Michigan]

She just wants to be on tv again that her 15 minutes of fame are past.

[CyberAnt]

"Wonkette was servicing the debate by speculating often about the size of John Kerry’s reproductive organ"

OMG - this must be a joke!

[cyncooper]

I think they did a disservice to the debate because they made the debate about the documents and not about the president of the United States. There was another half to that story that had to do with verifiable events of what Bush may have been up to.

How stupid is this wench?

What "about the president of the United States"? On what do we base "verifiable events"?

What an absolute dolt, saying we can't have facts entering into "the debate".

LOL

[CedarDave]

Once again, my tagline fits the article ---

[Congressman Billybob]

Face it, sex still sells. Wonkette is a young female who, according to her website, "does it" regularly and with numerous and only slightly restricted partners. That makes her a "hot babe" in the parlance of the bookers on media outlets.

If she was a young male who "played around" and had superficial opinions other than on sex, she would be one among millions and of no particular interest to the media. So what she has to say about Rathergate has no more relevance to the discussion than a discussion of what she did, with whom, with what part of her body, on a randomly chosen night last week. Which is to say, no relevance.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest, "Appointing Supreme Court Justices: The 'Nuclear Option' in the US Senate"

[Constitution Day]

Slag, harlot, trollop, strumpet, etc...

[HP8753]

There was another half to that story that had to do with verifiable events of what Bush may have been up to.

Verifiable by what??????Forged Documents????

[NonLinear]

There was another half to that story that had to do with verifiable events of what Bush may, have been up to.

You know, after five years of investigating the TANG issue, you'd think the events would have either been verifed or debunked, and no longer fall into the verifiable category.

The bulls**t meter is in the red.