Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ellesu
This is actually the first crime in 10 years that could have been affected by the now expired "clinton assault weapons ban" - it banned some rifles if they did not remove the bayonet lug...
4 posted on 12/20/2004 7:52:59 AM PST by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana

Uh no. WWII rifles are grandfathered. Next.


6 posted on 12/20/2004 7:55:13 AM PST by tbeatty (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat salad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana

The description of it as a "WW II era" weapons leads me to think it may be an M1 Garand. Thousands of these have been sold to civilians over the years. I don't think that weapon was ever banned under the Clinton AWB, even with a bayonet lug.


10 posted on 12/20/2004 7:57:11 AM PST by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana
This is actually the first crime in 10 years that could have been affected by the now expired "clinton assault weapons ban" - it banned some rifles if they did not remove the bayonet lug...

Nope, close but no cigar. They said it was a WW-II era rifle. Thus a Garand or possibly a Springfield, if a US weapon. All the likely foreign weapons, and the Springfield, are bolt actions. Even the Garand, which is a semi-auto, doesn't qualify because it doesn't have a removable magazine. The magazine it does have holds less than ten rounds as well.

39 posted on 12/20/2004 9:13:29 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana

This is actually the first crime in 10 years that could have been affected by the now expired "clinton assault weapons ban" - it banned some rifles if they did not remove the bayonet lug...

Actually, the real factor deciding if this incident could have been prevented by the ban is whether the father?/owner would have turned in his legally registered firearm when it became illegal.


43 posted on 12/20/2004 10:12:11 AM PST by angryirish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson