Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2banana

The description of it as a "WW II era" weapons leads me to think it may be an M1 Garand. Thousands of these have been sold to civilians over the years. I don't think that weapon was ever banned under the Clinton AWB, even with a bayonet lug.


10 posted on 12/20/2004 7:57:11 AM PST by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: blau993

My WWII era rifle is a short magazine lee enfield. I can get off 30 aimed shots a minute.

It also makes a slightly bigger hole going in.

And by the way, I have the bayonet too.


23 posted on 12/20/2004 8:28:18 AM PST by donmeaker (Why did the Romans cross the road? To keep the slaves from revolting again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blau993
The description of it as a "WW II era" weapons leads me to think it may be an M1 Garand.

Based on what? It could have been an Enfield, Mauser, Springfield, Mosin-Nagant, etc. Considering the bayonet was 15 inches long, I would tend to believe it was bolt action rifle.

32 posted on 12/20/2004 8:49:54 AM PST by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: blau993

Even if it was, guns manufactured before 1994 didn't have to meet the provision of the ban. It is "pre-Ban".


52 posted on 12/20/2004 11:49:41 AM PST by tbeatty (I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat salad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson