Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jackson has 220 kids over for a Party
MSNBC ^

Posted on 12/19/2004 3:42:09 PM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: cdbull23
This "innocent until proven guilty" thing is true.
However, are you willing to risk your child's well being???

I say, keep him away from kids until he's either dead or proven not guilty!

41 posted on 12/19/2004 4:24:01 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Because I fly, I envy no (wo)man on earth. - Anon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23
i think people should save their judgements until after the trial...you know, the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing...

Can we agree that it's not a good idea to let your children go to a party at the home of a guy that's NUTS!

42 posted on 12/19/2004 4:24:36 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Never Apolgise. Never Explain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative


That picture is
proof that his biology father is the Joker!


43 posted on 12/19/2004 4:24:42 PM PST by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizzouTigerRepublican

Knock, knock.
Who's there?
Little Boy Blue.
Little Boy Blue who?
Michael Jackson.


44 posted on 12/19/2004 4:29:08 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Judging by his face, this monster's sentence has been cast and is already being carried out...and this is only the warm up act.

45 posted on 12/19/2004 4:30:41 PM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

haha, i agree with you on that.

what a lot of people don't understand, though, is that he was only at this "party" of his for a minute or two...in fact, these parents didn't KNOW he would be there...they simply thought they were being given an invitation to take their children to what's pretty much a carnival.

i don't see anything wrong with the parents for allowing their kids to have a good time while being supervised.


46 posted on 12/19/2004 4:31:32 PM PST by cdbull23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bushisdamanin04

He didn't even get near the children. My God.


47 posted on 12/19/2004 4:31:38 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SALChamps03

true, but the thing is that the parents did not know that jackson would actually be there...he actually "surprised" the last group...i don't think you can hold the PARENTS accountable for this.


48 posted on 12/19/2004 4:33:27 PM PST by cdbull23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

49 posted on 12/19/2004 4:34:09 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Oh yeah - and F the french too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I don't care. I would never, never, never let my child go to Neverland ... never, never, Neverland.

Did the parents know in advance that freako wouldn't be near their kids?

..

50 posted on 12/19/2004 4:34:38 PM PST by bushisdamanin04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bushisdamanin04
The parents of these children are, IMO, unfit parents.

I certainly agree with you. Anyone that would even identify with this person is sick.

51 posted on 12/19/2004 4:37:44 PM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cdbull23
he actually "surprised" the last group...i don't think you can hold the PARENTS accountable for this.

WHAT? The parents are accountable for putting their child on the property of a suspected child molester!!!! Whether MJ was actually there or just lurking in front of vidio screens watching the little boys playing in his yard, the parents put their kids at risk. This is insane.

Oh he is innocent until proven in a court of law, but a parent's standards must be higher. He is CREEPY until proven otherwise.

52 posted on 12/19/2004 4:42:57 PM PST by myprecious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
If he were some Joe Schmoe, he'd already be in prison.

You can say that again!! My husband and I fostered children for over 30 years. The Los Angeles County jumped on molestation like a tiger!!!! and they were apprehended , booked , and went to trial FAST and NO LITTLE ONES could be around the alleged molester UNTIL proven innocent!!!! I know , I cared for their children!!!!!!

53 posted on 12/19/2004 4:44:19 PM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bushisdamanin04

Then don't let your kids go. My Gosh.


54 posted on 12/19/2004 4:50:00 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Why isn't this mutated freak, Michael Jackson, court-restrained from contact with children?!?!?


55 posted on 12/19/2004 4:51:24 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

He wasn't in contact with the children. He waved to them from far away. It wasn't like they were sent into a room alone with him. I just think you guys are overreacting


56 posted on 12/19/2004 4:52:22 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Is this low speed chase involving a minority celebrity consistent to the other low speed chase involving an acquitted O.J. (you're damn right I cut 'em up sucka) Simpson??
57 posted on 12/19/2004 4:53:17 PM PST by antiunion person (Everything I Say is Fully Substantiated by my Own Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MizzouTigerRepublican

Any parent who had their children there should be under investigation!


58 posted on 12/19/2004 4:53:21 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
He wasn't in contact with the children. He waved to them from far away.

I saw the movie "The Incredibles".

I know what can happen.

59 posted on 12/19/2004 4:54:16 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher
"This "innocent until proven guilty" thing is true."

I would say that he is VERY SUSPECT until proven innocent. Any stranger is SUSPECT until proven innocent and proven trustworthy. Nobody just deserves your respect and trust. They have to prove it and earn it. Everyone has to prove their character and trustworthiness. No parent in their right mind lets anyone around their children unless they know without a shadow of a doubt they are completely trustworthy and anyone who expects you to settle for less, anyone who is offended that you desire them to prove their worthiness to be with your child - scrap them and run quickly. This world is so very messed up/ Nothing short of an @nal exam for anyone you let near your children. No one sleep with stranger's children, hello, this is madness!! Why is this going on???
60 posted on 12/19/2004 4:54:28 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson