Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ayn Rand Institute's Yaron Brook on O'Reilly

Posted on 12/17/2004 5:27:19 PM PST by Remember_Salamis

ARI's Dr. Yaron Brock was on the O'Reilly Factor arguing that we are far too soft in Iraq and that we should "turn fallujah into dust". O'Reilly was login the argument and it was great.

You've gotta love Libertarian superhawks from the Ayn Rand Institute!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ari; aynrand; aynrandpinglist; iraq; objectivism; oreilly; rand; yaronbrook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 12/17/2004 5:27:20 PM PST by Remember_Salamis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

p


2 posted on 12/17/2004 5:29:03 PM PST by maine-iac7 (...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

" login "

Say what?


3 posted on 12/17/2004 5:32:12 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

I disagree with him, but he did do his homework.


4 posted on 12/17/2004 5:34:17 PM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

He means "lagging behind".


5 posted on 12/17/2004 5:35:01 PM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Just letting you know there is at least a 30 year old feud between Objectivists (What followers of Ayn Rand like to be called) and Libertarians. Objectivists don't like to be associated with them, while Libertarians don't really care either way.

I do think their positions on the middle east are pretty interesting. They are far more neo-con than the neo-cons would ever dream of being.


6 posted on 12/17/2004 5:37:40 PM PST by Odyssey-x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

It was a great exchange....O'Reilly was just too blabbby...
I basically agree with the guest -- we have been too soft and walking on eggs around the mosques...etc..
We need to do what we need to do to win.


7 posted on 12/17/2004 5:39:15 PM PST by LibertyLight (I Am Grateful For FreeRepublic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

The Ayn Rand Institute has a number of outstanding writers. I can honestly say that I receive all their briefs and articles and they are the ONLY writers that I read religiously and never miss one of their articles. Yaron Brock is outstanding.


8 posted on 12/17/2004 5:39:22 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

O'Rielly played the Hitler/Nazi card early, signaling to all that he lost the argument.


9 posted on 12/17/2004 5:40:41 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Liberalism has metastasized into a dangerous neurosis which threatens the nation's security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Woo hoo and I hope she invoked Godwin's law.

Godwin's Law (also Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is an adage in Internet culture that was originated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states that:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

There is a tradition in many Usenet newsgroups that once such a comparison is made, the thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. In addition, whoever points out that Godwin's Law applies to the thread is also considered to have "lost" the battle, as it is considered poor form to invoke the law explicitly. Godwin's Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. Many people understand Godwin's Law to mean this, although (as is clear from the statement of the law above) this is not the original formulation.

10 posted on 12/17/2004 5:42:48 PM PST by Odyssey-x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Ayn Rand was my introduction to philosophy and politics. You don't have to agree with her to agree that the Randians are by far the most passionate, intellectually rigorous and verbally skilled polemicists on the right.

Some Rand-style anti-left attacks posed from the highest levels of the Republican party would be absolutely devastating to the Democrats.

11 posted on 12/17/2004 5:43:52 PM PST by CanadianLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
You've gotta love Libertarian superhawks from the Ayn Rand Institute!

Yep. Technically they're Objectivist superhawks, and I much prefer their position to the pacifism of the LP. More here: The War for Civilization.

12 posted on 12/17/2004 5:47:11 PM PST by ThinkDifferent (These pretzels are making me thirsty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyLight

I agreed with him too! We are acting like wimps in Iraq so the rest of the world won't be mad at us. Well guess what,they are already mad at us.

We're damned if we do and damned if we don't.




13 posted on 12/17/2004 5:49:05 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CanadianLibertarian

Ayn Rand was my introduction into philosophy and Ronald Reagan was my introduction into politics.


14 posted on 12/17/2004 5:50:38 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Odyssey-x

Sorry. I tend to call the Objectivists Libertarians because they both so strongly espouse the laissez-faire outlook.

The only problem I have with the Objectivists is their hatred of God. I believe that their rabid Aetheism has held them back from being more prominent, in fact. The heir to Ayn Rand's Estate and the head of ARI, Leonard, Peikoff, is a RADICAL Abortion Rights who PUBLICLY states that abortion should be on demand and even has the audacity to have a website called http://www.abortionisprolife.com


15 posted on 12/17/2004 5:51:15 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Odyssey-x

I actually emailed this to O'Reilly:

Dear Mr. O’Reilly,

You clearly lost the debate with Dr. Yaron Brock from the Ayn Rand Institute. You invoked “Godwin’s Law”, which is the theory that as a discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one. Whoever brings up Nazis first has lost the debate.


16 posted on 12/17/2004 6:01:58 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

"You've gotta love Libertarian superhawks from the Ayn Rand Institute!"


Although the Objectivists and Ayn Rand have similar beliefs as the Libertarians. She very much disagreed with them and wanted nothing to do with them. She hated it when people compared her to them.


17 posted on 12/17/2004 6:07:37 PM PST by texasrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texasrad

Comparisons are unavoidable when they both so strongly espouse laissez-faire...


18 posted on 12/17/2004 6:10:22 PM PST by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Is there an Ayn Rand bump list? I'd like to join it if so.


19 posted on 12/17/2004 6:18:44 PM PST by GOP Jedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: texasrad
Personally, I am much more Republican than DemocRat, much more Libertarian than Republican, and much more Objectivist than anything.
I believe that government causes more problems than it solves. Both major parties consistently tell us how they are going to solve our problems.
The government should be here to protect our rights, not solve our problems.
(See Tagline)
20 posted on 12/17/2004 6:22:47 PM PST by dAnconia (The government cannot grant rights,but it can protect them. Or violate them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson