Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christians Face 47 Years in Prison Because Philly Judge Calls Bible Verses
Raiders News Update ^ | 12/16/04 | Kathryn Hooks

Posted on 12/16/2004 8:15:22 AM PST by OB1kNOb

Appeal to the Supreme Court last hope for Christians

“First, symbols of Christianity are removed from the public square; now, Christians are facing 47 years in prison because they preached the gospel in the public square. Stalin would be proud,” – Brian Fahling, AFA Center for Law and Policy Senior Trial Attorney.

Tupelo, MS - After a federal appeals court denied an emergency appeal to stop prosecution of 11 Christians on Tuesday, Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge William Austin Meehan ordered four of the Christians to stand trial on three felony (criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation, and riot) and five misdemeanor charges. If convicted, they could face up to 47 years in prison.

The Christians were arrested on October 10 for praying, singing, and reading scripture during an annual “gay pride” event known as “Outfest” in Philadelphia.

Since the federal courts did not intervene to halt the state prosecution, the last route for the Christians would be an appeal to the Supreme Court says the Christians’ attorney Brian Fahling, senior trial attorney for the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy.

“First, symbols of Christianity are removed from the public square, now, Christians are facing years in prison because they preached the gospel in the public square. Stalin would be proud,” Fahling said.

The federal appeals court in Philadelphia denied emergency relief despite video footage Fahling calls “undisputed evidence” that shows the Christians cooperating with police and continually being harassed by the Pink Angels, a group of homosexuals organized to impede the gospel message. Philadelphia city prosecutor in the case, Charles Ehrlich, attacked the Christians as “hateful” and referred to preaching the Bible as “fighting words,” the judge agreed.

Charges were dropped against the remaining seven apparently because they were not seen quoting scripture on the videotape.

The Philadelphia case represents another example of discrimination toward Christians,” said Tim Wildmon, president of the American Family Association national headquarters. “The past month has poured forth cases of Christian persecution seen in the higher education institution, public school systems, and the judicial court system.”

Center for Law and Policy

Contact: Kathryn Hooks 662-844-5036 American Family Association P.O. Drawer 2440 Tupelo, MS 38803 1-662-680-3886


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: afa; bible; christianpersecution; christians; court; donutwatch; hatecrime; homosexualagenda; michaelmarcavage; outfest; persecution; philadelphia; publicsquare; religion; religiousfreedom; repentamerica; wrongforum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-339 next last
To: little jeremiah

bump!


201 posted on 12/16/2004 10:00:37 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek

OH bullshit. They are being charged with felonies for exercising their Right to Free Speech.

Do you think Philly would charge fags under the same circumstances. I am so sick of all the ball-less moderates we are getting on FR. Please, go ahead and join the other frickin side-if you haven't already..


202 posted on 12/16/2004 10:00:41 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
What were they preaching?

What difference does it make. This is supposed to be the United States of America, and people should never be arrested for anything they say or think.

203 posted on 12/16/2004 10:01:33 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

And all this happened within walking distance of where the US Constitution was written and signed.

Time for a new Constitution and a new Declaration of Independance.

Also time for these judges to be taken out and hanged by the neck until dead for violating their oath of office.


204 posted on 12/16/2004 10:02:21 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (Goodnight Chesty, wherever you may be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Good lord, if you accuse me of defending Kinsey one more time you're going to have to be accused of being more than a troll. Re-read the things I have written. NEVER once did I defend Kinsey. I simply asked for more than just hearsay that he was doing the things people were accusing him of.

By the way, I'm looking at Dr. Reisman's website right now.


205 posted on 12/16/2004 10:03:30 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

stand up and throw the tea overboard if you have a pair!


206 posted on 12/16/2004 10:03:48 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (if a man lives long enough, he gets to see the same thing over and over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1john2 3and4

Fascinating point of view...thanks for giving me something to think about today. As for "evidence to convict" I hope they don't even have to do any major digging to find enough evidence, I hope it is in plain sight for all to view.


207 posted on 12/16/2004 10:04:13 AM PST by Preech1 (God, Bless America Please!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

>>>Time for a new Constitution and a new Declaration of Independance.

We don't need a NEW one. I stand by and support the old one.

Dust it off people!


208 posted on 12/16/2004 10:04:49 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
This is supposed to be the United States of America, and people should never be arrested for anything they say or think.

To an extent that is true. But these folks were also charged with obstructing a highway and rioting (which most likely means they did not have a permit). Both of those are far beyond just "saying and thinking".

209 posted on 12/16/2004 10:05:28 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
To be honest, I interpreted your responses of not only defending Kinsey; but of defending the actions he took.

Just lending some insight to how you came across to more than one person.
210 posted on 12/16/2004 10:06:42 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

Well, if you see the light on Kinsey I'll take back my words.

If you still think he was in any way legitimate or anything other than a vile criminal, my accusation stands.

Up to you.


211 posted on 12/16/2004 10:07:10 AM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Thanks. Do you perhaps see a pattern here though, with the Don Adams Teamster beating, Race Bannon, Berkely riots against conservatives where the conservatives are blamed and taken away etc etc?


212 posted on 12/16/2004 10:07:19 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
To the gay apologists, free speech is not about dissent, it is about the right to publicly embrace perversion. Like Francis Schaeffer said in the 60's, the left's free speech movement would be more accurately called the filthy speech movement. It should also be noted that the leftist advocates of "free speech" advocate free speech for them but us political correctness to take it away from others.

Further proof of their intellectual vacuousness can be found in a few posts on this thread that opined protecting the rights of the innocent means also protecting the rights of the guilty.

213 posted on 12/16/2004 10:07:34 AM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
which most likely means they did not have a permit

Rights don't require permits, priviledges do. Free assembly is a right, not a priviledge. Constitutionally, it cannot be tied to a permit any more than prayer can.

214 posted on 12/16/2004 10:08:06 AM PST by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I watched the video. It appeared they were on a sidewalk and not the road. Now were they staying in one place. The continuously kept trying to relocated and were stopped by 'parade attendees' with signs caging them in.


215 posted on 12/16/2004 10:08:57 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

this is an outrage...


216 posted on 12/16/2004 10:08:59 AM PST by wallcrawlr (Their mad because the Humvee isn't heavily armored...like the Jeep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

So Hitler was not a mass murderer, because he didn't personally kill anyone with his own hands?

And Charles Manson is also not guilty of murder, becuase he "merely" instigated henchmen to do the crimes?


217 posted on 12/16/2004 10:09:00 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Now = Nor


218 posted on 12/16/2004 10:09:24 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

Thoughts well expressed...Thought you'd like the free country stuff.


219 posted on 12/16/2004 10:10:16 AM PST by Edgerunner (Don't pay attention to me, ..I haven't been here long enough to have any credibility...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: freeeee

Exactly. I don't see any evidence on that tape that anyone was blocking a street, either. I can understand the idea of keeping people from blocking a public street without a permit, but it's clear that these people were arrested because of the content of their message.


220 posted on 12/16/2004 10:10:19 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-339 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson