Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connie Chung Blasts 'Cavemen' News Execs
NewsMax ^ | Dec 15, 2004 | Limbacher

Posted on 12/15/2004 6:01:48 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Veteran newscaster Connie Chung, who suffered through an uncomfortable two years as co-anchor with disgraced TV newsman Dan Rather, says CBS executives are unlikely to replace him with a woman because they are "cavemen."

"I don't know when network executives will get out of the Dark Ages," Chung told the Philadelphia Inquirer. "It's long overdue."

While the leading candidates to replace Rather when he steps down in March are CBS'ers John Roberts and Scott Pelly, Chung said that male anchors represent "an antiquated way of thinking."

The one-time anchorwoman said she'd like to see ABC's Diane Sawyer take Rather's place, noting, "It would be a great thing for all women."

Another name floated by Chung: NBC "Today Show" host Katie Couric.

She predicted that even when a woman does eventually follow in Rather's footsteps, she'll likely to be part of another male-female team.

"A man-and-woman team is utterly, predictably boring," she noted. "It's safer, and more common throughout local news."

Is Chung bitter that Rather was allowed to stay on as a solo anchor while she got that ax?

"I have no hard feelings," she told the Inquirer. "I have this very strange difficulty remembering the bad times. It's OK to remember the good times."

Asked what good times she recalled sharing with Rather, Chung replied,"I can't remember."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; conniechung; danrather; diannesawyer; feminazi; feminism; katiecouric
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2004 6:01:49 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Chung said that male anchors represent "an antiquated way of thinking."

She's almost right. It's network news in general that represents an antiquated way of thinking. The New Deal stopped being the most wonderful thing in history many long years ago. ;)

2 posted on 12/15/2004 6:03:13 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Couric would be an absolute disaster as a news anchor on the evening news. I don't want Perky


3 posted on 12/15/2004 6:03:19 AM PST by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Is Chung bitter that Rather was allowed to stay on as a solo anchor while she got that ax?

She got the ax because she insulted everybody involved in the OKC bombing rescue process.

4 posted on 12/15/2004 6:03:47 AM PST by kjam22 (What you win them by, is what you win them to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Connie Chung, isn't she the one that lied to the elderly mother of Newt??


5 posted on 12/15/2004 6:05:11 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

If Couric would be a disaster, then I hope they pick her.


6 posted on 12/15/2004 6:05:24 AM PST by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

so who cares what connie-the-commie thinks? She was a horrid journalist and stands less chance than I do of landing the job.

but let's keep that "just between you and I", shall we?


7 posted on 12/15/2004 6:08:13 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

When she and Rather we're co-anchors everyone could tell Rather absolutely hated it.


8 posted on 12/15/2004 6:08:30 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Connie Chunga ..."A man-and-woman team is utterly, predictably boring,"

That's so true.

And may I add, Msssssssss Chung is boring, irrelevant, and sooooooo passe.

Now on with the show!




May we see the next post please?

9 posted on 12/15/2004 6:09:34 AM PST by G.Mason (The replies by this poster are meant for self amusement only. Read at your own discretion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

So now the sex card has been played. How long before someone plays the race card? I think the best person should get the job regardless of race or sex but then I am a conservative. It is funny how these liberals always seem to hire white males for all the important jobs then tell us all how much we need affirmative action.


10 posted on 12/15/2004 6:09:40 AM PST by KJacob (I will not worry about 2008 until late 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Would Connie be happy if CBS hired Sharon Stone as their head newsreader?


11 posted on 12/15/2004 6:10:13 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"It would be a great thing for all women."

They can't even come up with any fresh lies. Anytime a woman says this, watch out. She acts like there are no women broadcasters on TV at all, at any level. I'm tired of libs' victim mentality. Sheesh.

12 posted on 12/15/2004 6:10:24 AM PST by rabidralph (Keep your laws off my money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

OMGosh! The Dark Ages, even. Has she noticed how high Condi Rice,a woman, has risen? Of course not. She doesn't count. She's a republican.


13 posted on 12/15/2004 6:10:36 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

"I don't know when network executives will get out of the Dark Ages...It's long overdue."

If Chung is so scary talented and cognizant of what's wrong with network leadership, why isn't she in charge?


14 posted on 12/15/2004 6:13:34 AM PST by Gefreiter (When seconds count, the police are minutes away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Notice tho that Chung believes only LIBERAL women need apply.

I think Monica Crowley would be an excellent news anchor any ANY station, alphabet or cable.

15 posted on 12/15/2004 6:14:00 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

You mean Connie "Come closer, whisper in my ear - just between me and you" Chung?


16 posted on 12/15/2004 6:15:45 AM PST by Jeff Blogworthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Couric would be an absolute disaster as a news anchor on the evening news. I don't want Perky

I think that CBS is the perfect place for her.....No one watches CBS.

17 posted on 12/15/2004 6:16:44 AM PST by Phrostie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
In order to be politically correct, CBS will have to replaced the disgraced Rather with a transexual liberal of mixed race who speaks English with a Spanish accent.
18 posted on 12/15/2004 6:16:58 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"The New Deal stopped being the most wonderful thing in history many long years ago."

My first thought was that FDR has been dead for 60 years and Stalin for 50 years now. Great minds must think alike.

Let me be the first to nominate Ann Coulter to replace "Frequency Kenneth" Blather! :)

19 posted on 12/15/2004 6:18:29 AM PST by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

"I have no hard feelings," she told the Inquirer. "I have this very strange difficulty remembering the bad times. It's OK to remember the good times."

Asked what good times she recalled sharing with Rather, Chung replied,"I can't remember."


Telling tale. Can't remember Rather favorably at all.

BWWWAAAAAAAAAA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHa
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!


20 posted on 12/15/2004 6:20:49 AM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson