Posted on 12/13/2004 11:38:45 AM PST by kcvl
Fox News...
Thats their way of keeping people glued, sitting and waiting.
Here's a better way to find out when the verdict is coming in. Some of these freepers have been keeping vigil all night:
Life or Death Scott Peterson Courttv blog
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1300270/posts
"The sentencing decision is coming in at 4:30 pm so it can interfere with coverage of the Ohio Election Fraud. No, seriously, I read it here."
BWHAHAHA!
The looniness continues on the left! What looooosers.
Thanks for the laugh.
I thought the guilt phase would be about whether or not he was guilty, and the penalty phase would be about what the penalty should be. Silly me.
Poke of Eternal Peace, bump.
If I were on the jury, I'd have to vote for life, given the lack of evidence. I hate Scott, but could not vote for death.
Theyr'e reporting that Scott showed up to court looking happy and upbeat today. What is really going on in that guy's head? Did the psychic hotline people tell him he'd get good news today?
Even if he get death, he's got at least another 25 years left - at a minimum. Many of us will be gone before he is.
Unless, of course, he PO's his new husband.
I think he'll get life in prison - no parole. Then again, I actually didn't think they'd be able to convict him in the first place.
I think he did it - but as folks have said on here, it was circumstantial.
Yeah - you never know about Commiefornia. OJ was proven 100 times more guilty than Peterson -- and he's still playing golf.
Then again - Peterson is pigmentally-challenged....
That's the thing about voting for a life sentence: the prisoners are going to kill him sooner than the state would if he got the death penalty. It'll take about a decade for all of his appeals to run dry. It would take about 2 months for him to get murdered when a guard just happened to be looking the other way.
I think ol Scottie is going to get used to that plug from his cellmate given what's hes facing the next 10-15 years..
In order to vote for life because of the lack of evidence, you would have also had to vote guilty despite the lack of evidence.
Does anyone here understand that it's wrong to send a man to prison for life because you don't think he's guilty? If he's guilty, he gets the death penalty. If he's innocent, he gets life. Does this really make sense?
The way she talks I thought it already was?
Great thread. Everyone should visit it. Fools! My post:
Damn those jurors! I wonder how they got to all 12 of them in order for them to deliver this verdict at this critical moment? No doubt this has been planned since jury selection back in June? Or worse...do you think this may have been Peterson's motive in killing his wife and UNBORN CHILD. Wow, these bastards will stop at nothing..
There go my DU posting privlidges! What shall I do now?
Yes, of course. But perhaps some jurors were only 85% sure he was guilty (beyond a reasonable doubt) and can't go further down that road to the death penalty. However, if I were on a jury with you, your cold hard logic would probably win me over. And maybe that's exactly what went down in the jury room. We'll soon find out.
So did O.J. Simpson.
He will get life without parole, IMO.
As Rush pointed out today, they don't execute anybody in CA, so Peterson will either get life in prison or life on deathrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.