Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerik Withdraws His Name for DHS Chief
Guardian Unlimited ^ | 12-11-04 | n/a

Posted on 12/11/2004 7:33:21 AM PST by EggsAckley

WASHINGTON (AP ) - Former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, President Bush's choice to be homeland security secretary, has withdrawn his name from consideration, the White House announced late Friday.

Presidential press secretary Scott McClellan, in a conference call to news organizations, revealed that Kerik had withdrawn ``for personal reasons.''

``The president respects his decision and wishes the commissioner and his wife, Hala, well,'' McClellan said in a statement.

``Commissioner Kerik is withdrawing his name from director of homeland security,'' the spokesman said. ``He informed the White House this evening that he was withdrawing for personal reasons from consideration to be secretary of homeland security.''

McClellan said that Kerik telephoned the president at about 8:30 p.m. EST. Kerik also sent a letter to the White House in which he announced his wishes.

McClellan said the White House ``will move as quickly as we can to name someone else to fill this nomination.''

Bush's nomination of Kerik quickly proved controversial. News reports in recent days focused on revelations that Kerik had made millions of dollars a stun gun company that sold weapons to the Homeland Security Department and which wants more business. The White House had said that Kerik would avoid any conflicts of interest.

Records filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission show Kerik made $6.2 million by exercising stock options he received from Taser International. He has been a consultant for the company and still serves on its board of directors, although the company and the White House said he planned to sever the relationship.

Kerik, 49, had been selected by Bush to succeed Tom Ridge in the Cabinet-level position, heading a huge federal agency that was founded in reaction to the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks against New York and Washington.

Kerik was anticipating hearings on his confirmation, and earlier Friday had held a private breakfast meeting in New Jersey, where Sen. Jon Corzine told him that New Jersey should receive more money from the federal agency, according to a spokesman for Corzine.

Corzine told Kerik the state's entire congressional delegation and acting Gov. Richard J. Codey were united in getting the agency to change the way it doles out funds, said Corzine spokesman Brad Woodhouse.

Woodhouse said the senator told Kerik during the meeting at an undisclosed site in New Jersey that he believes the funding formula should be based on the risk of a terror attack.

Just hours before Kerik withdrew his name, the White House defended him on questions about potential ethical conflicts of interest.

``We have full confidence in his integrity and we are confident that he will take the appropriate steps necessary to make sure that there are no conflicts there,'' McClellan had said at his midday briefing.

``We've looked into all these issues, and obviously, he'll be talking about some of these matters during his confirmation hearing,'' McClellan had said earlier. ``But the president appointed Commissioner Kerik because he knows he is someone who is firmly committed to helping us win the war on terrorism and make sure that we are doing everything we can to protect the homeland.''

Taser was one of many companies that received consulting advice from Kerik after he left his job as New York City police commissioner in 2001, when he was earning $150,500 a year.

Partnering with former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani or operating independently, Kerik has had business arrangements with manufacturers of prescription drugs, computer software and bulletproof materials, as well as companies selling nuclear power, telephone service, insurance and security advice for Americans working abroad.

The man who led the New York Police Department on Sept. 11, 2001, has been praised effusively by Senate Republicans and Democrats for his management during and after the attacks. In Iraq in 2003, Kerik served as interior minister under the Coalition Provisional Authority, the Pentagon-run occupation authority.

Federal ethics rules say executive branch employees should avoid participating in decisions where their impartiality could be questioned, unless they receive approval from an agency ethics official.

Kerik's office said he was not available for comment for the story about his financial dealings. But a White House spokesman, Brian Besanceney, had said earlier that the nominee would avoid any possible conflict of interest.

``Commissioner Kerik is committed to the highest ethical standards and will divest all his holdings in Taser upon Senate confirmation to avoid a conflict of interest,'' Besanceney said. ``In order to avoid even the appearance of a conflict, he will comply with all ethics laws and rules to avoid actions that affect former clients or organizations where he served as a director.''


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demoscalp; dhs; kerik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2004 7:33:21 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Hope this wasn't already posted. Nothing came up on a search.


2 posted on 12/11/2004 7:34:35 AM PST by EggsAckley (...............stop unnecessary excerpting.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Embarrassing.
3 posted on 12/11/2004 7:35:26 AM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Another example of a Republican owning up to his mistakes and moving on (A la Bush re: the coke / drinking crap of his youth). A dem would have denied, denied, denied, then evaded, then lied ...
It's a stupid mistake that he made but he did the right thing by owning up to it and moving on.


4 posted on 12/11/2004 7:37:17 AM PST by Truth'sBabyGirl (Bucknell class of 2003, Fordham Law 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Why is it that ethics, New York and Cop never seem to go together?


5 posted on 12/11/2004 7:38:29 AM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

Police Commissioner who may have broke the law (they aren't clear whether she was an illegal) just shows the need for STRICTER laws concerning illegals.

Maybe now President Bush will get tougher on illegals (?)

I dont think that they said if W knew about this when he chose him.

But the rats and their rat media are really blowing this one up out of proportion as usual.


6 posted on 12/11/2004 7:39:55 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

Why in the hell didn't Kerik just decline when his name first came up. Very insulting to Bush, IMO.


7 posted on 12/11/2004 7:40:05 AM PST by EggsAckley (...............stop unnecessary excerpting.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Hope this wasn't already posted. Nothing came up on a search.

Ya sure?

:)

8 posted on 12/11/2004 7:40:08 AM PST by upchuck (My "just in time" supply chain for taglines is busted. Come back tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Nyuck nyuck nyuck. Very funny, Mr. Snoid.


9 posted on 12/11/2004 7:41:24 AM PST by EggsAckley (...............stop unnecessary excerpting.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: EggsAckley

I don't see why this should be such a problem since they don't have a problem with illegal immigration.


11 posted on 12/11/2004 7:45:27 AM PST by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876

So ... whats the guy done wrong?


12 posted on 12/11/2004 7:47:10 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: EggsAckley

What always surprises me is that the power elite who are in the top echelons of their profession delegate their children's welfare to someone who is not even a citizen. Seems to speak badly for them as parents let alone as citizens avoiding tax law.


14 posted on 12/11/2004 7:47:57 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Because this happened while he was away in Iraq. His wife made the mistake, and he is taking responsiblility for it. Just as he said in the resignation letter, he discovered it when he was filling out the papers to support his confirmation.


15 posted on 12/11/2004 7:49:32 AM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Part of the legacy from the years of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001". Several nominees to Cabinet level posts and administrative positions were withdrawn in those years because of a "nanny problem", illegals who were employed and for whom no payments were being made to FICA on a timely basis. This established a precedent, which is another example of political correctness once again carried too far.

"What did this person know, and when did he (or she) know it?"

Once, it was entirely possible that an employer might NOT have known the status of a foreign-born employee, and it was not all that uncommon for a domestic servant to not have Social Security funds withheld from pay and forwarded to the US Treasury, a requirement easily overlooked by someone who casually employed only one or a few people for domestic purposes in a year.


16 posted on 12/11/2004 8:04:42 AM PST by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
What's embarrassing about it? The man did the right thing, nothing embarrassing about that. How many dems would have done the same? (Did Clinton ever admit he was in the wrong? No, I believe he debated the meaning of "is" and denied everything until the blue dress turned up.)
17 posted on 12/11/2004 8:05:11 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
Because this happened while he was away in Iraq

Can you provide a source? The NYT says:

A former New York City official who knows the circumstances of the withdrawal said that the housekeeper, who had worked for the Kerik family for about a year, left for her home country two weeks ago.

Fox says Keric left Iraq 9-4-03. In any case, he was present for a year of her employment without checking or withholding.

I find it interesting that her departure is about a week before his nomination.

18 posted on 12/11/2004 8:28:24 AM PST by Wake75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Truth'sBabyGirl

Prsident Bush never has said that he used coke, where do you get your information? Do you have sources, can you provide a link? Are you trying to start a rumor?


19 posted on 12/11/2004 8:29:27 AM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
I don't see why this should be such a problem since they don't have a problem with illegal immigration.

B.S.

20 posted on 12/11/2004 8:33:12 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson