Posted on 12/10/2004 11:36:01 AM PST by DBeers
Hey Kids! Want Good Sex? Try Abstinence.
Warren Throckmorton
As a mental health counselor, I am really troubled by the numbers of adolescents that I have counseled who cried for days and hurt for years because they engaged in "safer sex" within dead end, unfulfilling relationships. Sadly, they learned that safer sex can be hazardous to their emotional health.
I think the current political debate concerning abstinence vs. contraceptive based sexual education has failed to include an important variable in the discussion of what to teach in school: sexual well being.
In many contemporary sexual education curricula, young boys and girls who listen carefully in health class will be schooled in the virtues of condoms. They may learn the mechanics and become involved in safer sex without the result of pregnancy or deadly disease. Sadly, though, such programs rarely inform them that their emotional and sexual adjustment would be enhanced if they would wait for the marital bed. What a disservice to a generation of young people.
I am raising this point because I just finished authoring a report, with colleague David Blakeslee concerning proposed changes in sexual education curriculum in Montgomery County, MD. Among other innovations, these changes offer students a PG-13 experience in watching a condom application demonstration, featuring a female and a cucumber. Further, the curriculum explains to students that it is harmful to have risky sex (meaning sans condom) but says next to nothing about any problems associated with engaging in pre-marital sexual relationships, provided condoms are on board.
In other words, 10th graders, we will tell you that applying condoms may prevent disease and pregnancy but we will not tell you that your long term sexual and emotional satisfaction may be enhanced by saving sex until marriage. The curriculum says in places that the only sure way to prevent disease and pregnancy is through abstaining but there is no mention that ones overall well being might be enhanced by waiting.
Since you wont hear this in school, here are a few survey findings from research concerning abstinence. According to 1996 data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, lower sexual activity among adolescents is correlated with higher levels of well being. In fact, sexually active girls are over three times as likely to report depressive symptoms than their abstaining counterparts and sexually active boys are over twice as likely to report depressive symptoms. Amazingly, these two groups report higher incidence of suicide attempts; boys in particular are at 8 times the risk for a suicide attempt if they are sexually active.
Young women are particularly vulnerable. According to the sex survey Social Organization of Sexuality, by Edward Laumann and colleagues, young women often go along with intercourse the first time, finding little physical pleasure in it The report notes that there are dramatic costs for young women which are increasing as young women have intercourse earlier in the life course. (p.347). Sounds like delaying sexual involvement is a good thing both emotionally and sexually.
Concerning marital sex, the same report indicates that a monogamous sexual partnership embedded in a formal marriage evidently produces the greatest satisfaction and pleasure. (p. 364). Further, religious women are more likely to report being sexually satisfied than non-religious counterparts. These are the women who are more likely to have waited until they can follow the teachings of their faith about being embedded in a formal marriage before they have sex. However, presumably abstaining works for those of all faiths and those with none.
Why dont health educators want kids to know these things? Good question. Ask it sometime at school board meeting.
Instead religious people and those who favor abstinence until marriage are usually portrayed as prudish, repressed folks afraid to talk about sex, let alone practice it. Rather it appears those smiles may be more than religious euphoria.
Given the positive health and mental health benefits of abstinence, it looks to me like these research findings should be prominently featured in sex education curricula. That is unless all we want to do is get latex around the problem.
However, often the research results reported above are not even mentioned. Not in the Montgomery County curriculum and almost never in public debate concerning the best form of sexual education.
So kids, want great sex? Now you know what to do. Or should I say: what not to do.
Warren Throckmorton, PhD is Associate Professor of Psychology and Director of the College Counseling Services at Grove City College (PA). He is co-author, along with David Blakeslee, Psy.D. of the recent report, Health Education as Social Advocacy, which is available at http://www.drthrockmorton.com/montgomery.pdf. He can be reached at ewthrockmorton@gcc.edu .
This article ought to be spam! <{Applause}>
I would but they did not meantion her phone number in the article.
Interesting way of looking at it...
Sexual attraction is like duct tape. It sticks really well the first time, but if you peel it off it doesn't stick so well the next time. After five or six go 'rounds, it hardly sticks at all...
I know her well. She is very demanding but embracing her is well worth it.
Thats no fun.
Excellent article--truth all the way. As one who practiced promiscuity from an early age, became a Christian at age 26, and subsequently became a partner in a life-long, God-honoring marriage, I can testify that those smiles are not just "religious euphoria."
Sometime ago, there I read an article called "The Revenge of the Church Ladies" which explained data found in research studies that the most modest, seemingly-prudish and strait-laced religious women were the most sexually-satisfied in their monogamous marriage relationships. Sweet revenge indeed!!
Lots of sex ed material describes homosexual sex with a condom as safe sex. Specifically receptive anal sex with a condom which, in truth, is NOT safe and with respect to HIV is more dangerous than vaginal sex without a condom. This business of describing anal sex with a condom as safe is due to the influence of the homosexual lobby. There is more wrong with most sex ed than just the "mental health dangers" of early sex.
BTTT -one to add to your pinging
lol
If you think promiscuity is fun, you obviously haven't experienced sex in a relationship that both people are committed to for life. Sure, sex outside of marriage is fun, and feels good physically, or at least you can convince yourself it is and does. But sex inside a committed relationship is deeply satisfying not only physically, but emotionally, mentally, and spiritually. People (and I have the experience to speak to this) who have sex outside of a committed relationship, specifically marriage, do not have any idea what they are missing.
Not only that, but I can also tell you that there is plenty of baggage that is taken into a marriage when you have been promiscuous, and it takes a long time to overcome it. I will probably always have reminders that come back to haunt me from time to time. I am thrilled and deeply thankful that my children (who are old enough to make this decision) are committed to abstinence until marriage. Don't think that you can have your fun and then go into a committed relationship and have the same experience as someone who saved themselves for marriage. You cannot have the best of both worlds.
LOL! How sweet it is!
bump
BTTT
I saw this on Townhall this morning - excellent article.
Reason #1205 why God's plan for our bodies is a good idea. He gave us instructions and commands because He loves us. Such an excellent article. I haven't seen this subject brought up much in this on going discussion.
I'm printing this out and keeping it for when my children need to read this. I'm going to be teaching the teen girls at church soon and I'll be sharing this in class. It's hard to understand the practical reasons for obeying God when you're young.
I am raising this point because I just finished authoring a report, with colleague David Blakeslee concerning proposed changes in sexual education curriculum in Montgomery County, MD.
The Story of how Social Policy Crept into a Sex Education Curriculum
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.