Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Humvee makers dispute Rumsfeld remarks
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | Friday, December 10, 2004 | GEORGE EDMONSON

Posted on 12/10/2004 8:54:04 AM PST by SwordofTruth

More armored vehicles could readily be built, two companies say

By GEORGE EDMONSON
COX NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON -- The manufacturer of Humvees for the U.S. military and the company that adds armor to the utility vehicles are not running near production capacity and are making all that the Pentagon has requested, spokesmen for both companies said.

"If they call and say, 'You know, we really want more,' we'll get it done," said Lee Woodward, a spokesman for AM General, the Indiana company that makes Humvees and the civilian Hummer versions.

At O'Gara-Hess & Eisenhardt, the Ohio firm that turns specially designed Humvees into fully armored vehicles at a cost of about $70,000 each, spokesman Michael Fox said they, too, can provide more if the government wants them.

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., said yesterday that the companies could increase production of armored Humvees from 450 a month to 550 by February.

Blaming the shortage on a lack of production capacity, as Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld did Wednesday, is "just not true," said Bayh. He said he had told the Pentagon as early as April that more armored Humvees could be built.

"It's essentially a matter of physics," Rumsfeld told the soldiers in his reply on Wednesday. "It isn't a matter of money. It isn't a matter on the part of the Army of desire. It's a matter of production and capability of doing it."

But Bayh, in a telephone conference call with reporters, said the problem was another indication of the administration's underestimation of the risks and demands in Iraq.

"It borders on the naïve," Bayh added.

Yesterday, President Bush led an administrationwide public relations effort to quell the controversy triggered when a soldier sharply questioned Rumsfeld about shortages of armor for combat vehicles in Iraq at a meeting with troops in Kuwait.

In an e-mail circulated yesterday, a reporter for the Chattanooga Times Free Press traveling with the unit whose soldiers challenged Rumsfeld told colleagues that he had collaborated with the troops to formulate tough questions for the Pentagon chief.

But at a White House photo session yesterday, Bush agreed the soldiers' worries were legitimate and said, "The concerns expressed are being addressed.

"We expect our troops to have the best possible equipment."

Bush also said he told families of Marine casualties that he met during a visit to Camp Pendleton, Calif., on Tuesday that "we're doing everything we possibly can to protect your loved ones in a mission which is vital and important.' "

The current monthly production level of armored Humvees is up from as few as 15 in the fall of 2003, said Pentagon spokesman Larry Di Rita.

According to Army figures, there are almost 19,400 Humvees operating in the Iraq theater. Of those, about 5,900 were armored at the factory and armor was added to about 9,100 of them later.

Other vehicles also lack armor. The House Armed Services Committee released statistics yesterday showing that most transport trucks crisscrossing Iraq to supply the troops don't have armor. Only 10 percent of the 4,814 medium-weight transport trucks have armor, and only 15 percent of the 4,314 heavy transport vehicles do.

The Humvee name comes from the pronunciation of the abbreviation of its prosaic military title: High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle -- HMMWV.

Woodward said AM General -- a descendant of American Motors that once built Rambler automobiles -- has added workers and increased overtime to meet demand.

The number of large Hummers, which share part of the assembly line with Humvees, has been reduced to a level that has no impact on Humvee production, Woodward said. The smaller Hummer SUV is built in a separate building, he added.

Woodward would not detail AM General's current monthly Humvee production figures.

The Humvees to be factory-armored by O'Gara-Hess have some different specifications than the models shipped without armor, Woodward said. So increasing production requires careful planning.

"It's not like making a Big Mac," he said. "There are so many configurations. ... You can't just whip them through like a big grill in a McDonald's."

Besides having increased the number of Humvees it is receiving, the military is also shifting armored ones to Iraq from other areas, including the United States and the Balkans. An Army fact sheet said 282 factory-armored Humvees are on ships headed to Iraq.

And 10 sites have been established, two in Kuwait and eight in Iraq, where armor is added to Humvees, Lt. Gen. Steven Whitcomb told Pentagon reporters yesterday in a teleconference from Kuwait. According to the Army information, 9,134 of 9,386 add-on armor kits in the Iraq theater have been installed.

Whitcomb said the factory-installed armor provides protection that he described as "a bubble." Add-on armor does not protect the Humvee's top and bottom, he added.

In Iraq, the need for more armored Humvees came to the fore in August 2003 when insurgents changed tactics and started using roadside bombs, Whitcomb said.

"What we also can't lose sight of is that the Humvee was a vehicle that was not designed to afford armor protection, nor were most of our trucks, he said. "The only (factory-armored) Humvees -- the high-end ones -- we had were for our military police forces."

The P-I Washington Bureau contributed to this report.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armor; humvee; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: valuesvaluesvalues

So it is okay to criticize the troops but Rumsfeld is a sacred cow?


22 posted on 12/10/2004 10:04:48 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

Rumsfeld was talking about adding armor to the vehicles the military already has not the new vehicles coming from the manufacturers. There was a general on c-span yesterday telling and showing the reporters in Kuwait that there would not be any vehicles going into Iraq that was not armor plated.


23 posted on 12/10/2004 10:09:17 AM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: SwordofTruth
The complaint was given to the DOD from months ago, and the DOD have been working to increase up armor kits, and you will know TACOM was working from months ago. It is not Rumsfeld's fault, but the fault of military industry and the steel industry not doing enough. They seem to be aware of short term increase of sales that will be cost inefficient for a sudden decline as the troops will leave Iraq in few years. The industry should have increased the equipment and human resource but it does not seem that they are doing so. I blame the industry and we should put pressure on the industry to upgrade their factories and get more human resource immediately.
25 posted on 12/10/2004 10:31:33 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
I blame the industry and we should put pressure on the industry to upgrade their factories and get more human resource immediately.

Did you even read the article?

They are capable of producing more now, but haven't been asked to by the Pentagon.

26 posted on 12/10/2004 10:38:35 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: valuesvaluesvalues
We need to be talking about how he got set up by a commie lib reporter, not about how he's going down. Don't let them win.

I suppose all of those troops cheering this question were setting Rumsfeld up to, right?

27 posted on 12/10/2004 10:42:33 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

That is a lie to me.


28 posted on 12/10/2004 10:49:30 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Uh oh, looks like Rummy's stepped in it this time. He should have said he didn't know, and he'd get back to the soldier on that question.

Yes, that would have been the prudent response.

29 posted on 12/10/2004 10:54:17 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
That is a lie to me.

Well if you didn’t believe the article then why didn't you just say so to start with? If these manufacturers are lying, or the reporter is, then the truth will come out eventually. Why do you think it is a lie?

30 posted on 12/10/2004 10:58:32 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
$70,000.00 a pop for armor? I'm in the wrong business.

I'm sure the troops adding armor to their vehicles in Kuwait and Iraq would like to be reimbursed that much for adding much needed value.

31 posted on 12/10/2004 11:10:02 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
Tell you what, I have been asking Department of Defense for up armored hummers from the December of 2003, and even before that TACOM was working on a concept for the armors even before that. This was even news last year. Just weeks ago, I found out that Textron Marine & Land Systems had the capabilities to build more ASV-150 Commandos so I informed the Department of Defense, and just days ago, and even before this soldier made complaints in front of the public, Textron Marine & Land Systems announced they were going to increase their production rather it was by request or not. It should also have hinted that Department of Defense were concerned for more production. If you search through several Department of Defense related sites, you will know news were posted for weeks and months ago they have been contacting the industry for an increase of production and decrease of cost. The Department of Defense posted news that the military industry were working 24 hours a day for maximum capacity what they have at that point. At one point, yes the military industry was at the maximum capacity at that moment, but I think that the military industry had chances for months to increase factory lines of production more than they have now. There was a post on another news on the Freerepublic that one have blamed about the steel related industry not doing their best on production capabilities while they had chance to do so. I have been doing a research from months ago about this concern, and I still think it is the problem of the industry and not the Department of Defense nor Rumsfeld. If the industry had chance for increase, the industry should have informed and that should have been likely because of the profits they may earn in that span.
32 posted on 12/10/2004 11:11:49 AM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

Would Bush and Rummy lie?????? You bet your sweet bippy that did.


33 posted on 12/10/2004 11:16:25 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

C5A can take several at a time. C5A was here in NC yesterday taking Xmas things overseas for poor kids.


34 posted on 12/10/2004 11:17:52 AM PST by cynicom (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
The Corporal's question, and Rummy's answer, both seem to assume the validity of the premise that virtually all vehicles in Iraq should be armored. Is this really the case? It seems to me that there would be a trade-off of armor vs. vision, maneuverability, speed, capacity and the like.
35 posted on 12/10/2004 11:18:13 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

Umm - I'm a Rummy Fan.


36 posted on 12/10/2004 11:19:50 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20041209-1765.html

Presser from Iraq yesterday.


37 posted on 12/10/2004 11:20:14 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

Cute, but typical LM article. A Demorat Senator gets to provide his unsubstantiated propaganda, then the spokesman from AM General gets to share a few facts at the end. Even some FReepers are falling for this crap. And that's after the most obvious bias demonstrated in the 2004 election!


38 posted on 12/10/2004 11:20:30 AM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
I am and will always be of the opinion that any modern military conflict should be over in less that 96 hours. We need to kick ass, break all the infastructure or power, water, communications and sewage. Blow the bridges, airfields and ports then leave. Walk away at that point. Let other communist/terrorist /socialist regimes clean up their own mess.

I have been here a long time. Truer words have never been typed into this forum.

39 posted on 12/10/2004 11:22:14 AM PST by BikerTrash (Enough already with the carnival freak show...bring back COOL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette

Sure didn't sound like it.


40 posted on 12/10/2004 11:24:34 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Pass Tort Reform Now! Make the bottom clean for the catfish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson