I still doubt he runs, but if he does, he will be the automatic front-runner. I'm just hoping that if he is the nominee, everyone comes together after the primary. Even if you are a voter that pro-life issues are your number one concern, you have to agree that having a Republican president, regardless if he is pro-choice, will do more good for your cause than having a Democrat president.
I think I'd be committing a mortal sin by voting for Guilliani. There's no way I'd ever do it.
Remember some of the garbage that was surfacing during his Senate run: the oddness of the dissolution of his marriage, his suspected daliances while still married, not to speak of his ardent pro-abortion and overall socially liberal views.
Rudy's a smart man, so he must know that he has no real chance to actually win GOP primaries. "Values" conservatives would coalesce around a favored, culturally-conservative opponent and run Rudy out of the race by June of 2004 at the latest.
>>>>Even if you are a voter that pro-life issues are your number one concern, you have to agree that having a Republican president, regardless if he is pro-choice, will do more good for your cause than having a Democrat president.
I don't agree with that in any way. To be honest, if you take off the pro-life issues, many pro-lifers have more in common with moderate Democrats than they do with Guiliani. I won't vote for a pro-choicer from either party, period. I certainly won't campaign for the man.
patent
I would dig up Bob Casey and jump-start him before I'd vote for Giuliani.
I think we will see a breakout front runner of Senator George Allen, the former Governor of Virginia.
He's a complete package.