GOT FEAR?

scottmalensek.com ^ | 12/8/04 | Sam Pender

[Blackrain4xmas]

GOT FEAR? by Sam Pender

What does it take to realize that the Democratic Party offers nothing but complaints, dissent for dissent's sake, opposition instead of options, and does so purely with lies?

Bush stole the 2000 election-not true, but out of argument's sake, let's say there's a chance that the Supreme Court and the entire US media was manipulated...a slim chance as it would be the greatest conspiracy in history!

911 Was a govt conspiracy (either by neocons, the Republicans in control of the White House, or a bi-partisan govt coverup).... Well, the Independent and bi-partisan 911 Commission says that's not the case. The German Die Speigal investigation says that's not the case The bi-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee says that's not the case All the Democratic candidates for President say that's not the case If it IS THE CASE, then there's obviously a very slim chance, and that chance is dependent upon the slim chance that President Bush stole the 2000 election

President Bush forced the Patriot Act on Congress to turn the country into a police states. Not exactly since it was co-written in a bi-partisan manner, and passed in a strongly bi-partisan manner. So either the Democrats who wrote it and voted for it were too stupid to see a scam, or they were part of a scam, or there is no scam. Hey, who knows....maybe they are all morons, and maybe there's an iota of validity to the allegation that the Bush Admin is trying to turn the US into a police state. If so, that chance is dependent upon the very slim chance that 911 was a govt conspiracy which is dependent upon the slim chance that the President stole the 2000 election.

Afghanistan was invaded for natural gas pipelines to benefit the Bush Admin. Truth is that if there was anything of value in Afghanistan it'd have been controlled long ago instead of being turned into a 300yr battlefield. The truth is that no pipelines have been built, but some were proposed by during the Clinton Admin to the Carlyle Group and other oil investment firms, and while those ideas were turned down, more fmr Clinton Admin officials belong to those groups than Bush Admin officials or prominent Republicans. Hey, who knows....maybe there is a minute chance that in the NEXT four years some pipelines will be built, but it's a minute chance contingent upon the very slim chance that the govt attacked the govt on 911, based on the slim chance that Pres Bush stole the 2000 election.

Pres Bush lied about Iraq to make a case for war. Well, the bi-partisan Sen Intel Committee looked into this and reported in detail that all of the allegations that Bush Lied were false, and rather than lies the intelligence community in whole had failed the President. The Australian govt looked into the allegation and found no substance to it. The British have had several investigations look into this, and ALL have found no evidence of deliberate distortion, but HAVE found that massive intel failures occured-legitimate failures. Even the famous 16-words about uranium that the Democrats harped on to no end was proven to be a lie by Amb Joe Wilson and not the President (per the independent and bi-partisan 911 Commission). But hey, who knows....maybe there's a little bitty chance that the entire Congress (including Democrats who wrote the authorization to use force, promoted the war before they protested the war, and who passed the authorization en masse)...maybe Congress was duped and the investigation was duped. If so, that's a little bitty chance dependent upon a minute chance that the govt attacked the govt on 911, based on the slim chance that Pres Bush stole the 2000 election.

The President invaded Iraq for personal reasons. Well, that's not a rip-roaring endorsement for the 9/10 Democrats who ran for President after writing the authorization to use force, after calling for force since 1996, after they created the 1998 policy of Regime Change in Iraq, and after they claimed to have fully supported the idea (until becoming Presidential candiates of course). So, either the Democratic Party has once again demonstrated gross ineptitude, stupidity, and complete lack of resolve, or they supported the man that they were to run against in a national election. In any case, that's mega-doubtful....but hey, I'm interested in being open about things, so let's admit that there's an eensy-weensy chance that the President invaded Iraq for personal reasons with the help of the opposition party. That said....this eensy-weensy chance is dependent upon a little bitty chance that the intelligence and case for war was manipulated by the Bush Admin which is dependent upon a minute chance that the govt attacked the govt on 911, based on the slim chance that Pres Bush stole the 2000 election.

2004 Rolls around, and the longest Presidential campaign in American history-with the most opposition candidates in American history comes to a head. President Bush wins by the biggest margin in almost a generation. He carries more districts than any candidate since before Pres Reagan. He wins 51% of the popular vote, and a clear electoral victory. The tightest state victory is still 100,000 votes which is far more than disputable. Yet, many die-hard liberals and so-called Democrats claim that the election was stolen again-this time with the same allegations used in 2000, and that electonic voting machines were being manipulated by the Bush Admin and its cronies to steal the election (ie a SECOND coup!). ok. I'm trying hard not to be dismissive, so I'll admit that there's a teensy-weensy possibility that the election was stolen.

HOWEVER, I have to also admit that this teensy-weensy possibility is dependent upon the eensy-weensy chance that the President invaded Iraq for personal reasons (to fund his 2004 coup, etc.) with the fervent help of the opposition, and THAT eensy-weensy chance is dependent upon a little bitty chance that the intelligence and case for war was manipulated by the Bush Admin which is dependent upon a minute chance that the govt attacked the govt on 911, based on the slim chance that Pres Bush stole the 2000 election.

Conspiracies build upon each other, and even giving each one the benefit of the doubt makes the chances of subsequent conspiratorial allegations even tougher to swallow...unless one is just seeking affirmation for their own denial in which case they'd believe anything that made them feel better-see also Michael Moore.

*****

Summary: 2004 election was a coup=slim chance

911 was govt atk on govt=very slim chance

Patriot Act was to secure conspiracies=possible iota of truth Afghanistan was just a blood for nat gas war=minute chance

Bush lied about Iraqi threat=little bitty chance

Iraq War was private GWB war=eensy-weeny chance

2004 election was yet another American coup=teensy-weensy possibility

So to be a good Democrat, a good liberal, and a faithful leftist...one MUST believe the building conspiracies despite there only being a teensy-weensy possibility based on an eensy-weeny chance based on a little bitty chance based on a minute chance based on a possible iota of truth based on a very slim chance based on a slim chance of any truth to the "progressive" propagandist rants.

If each conspiracy is given just a 1% (and none deserve even that), then there's a 1/128th of a percent chance that the Democratic Party is selling the truth (0.007% chance that they are the party selling reality). Looking at it from the other side....the Democrats are at best promoting not 99% of the lies that have divided America, but 99.9921% of the lies that have divided America (AT BEST!)

[Grampa Dave]

"Looking at it from the other side....the Democrats are at best promoting not 99% of the lies that have divided America, but 99.9921% of the lies that have divided America (AT BEST!)"

[RockinRight]

May I cut and paste this to liberal friends?

[cvq3842]

The first sentence says it all. I STILL don't know what kerry's Iraq policy was. Neither does he!

[Blackrain4xmas]

You can send this article to anyone you want, but I'd appreciate it if you suggested looking at my books on Amazon if you send it to a particularly conservative site.

The books are:
Iraq's Smoking Gun
How Did It Come To This?
America's War With Saddam
and
The Ignored War

Thanks & post away!
-Sam Pender

[cvq3842]

Thanks for message - I think you are responding to someone else, so I'm "forwarding" it.

[Edgerunner]

da plan, da plan...

[cvq3842]

Right!

I kinda miss Kerry - he was such a good target for satire.

Then again, I'm glad the Presidency is safe from his type for the next four years . . .

[Blackrain4xmas]

Yeah, the only thing more satirical than Sen Kerry was the Dean campaign. Oh man that was laugh-filled. I wonder how many dems were avid Deaniacs, switched to Kerry after Iowa, and are now left shaking their heads.

This article's about the disbelief and denial in the Democratic Party, and how the excuses are piling up. Pretty soon there's gonna have to be a string of support groups.

Think about it.
November-the longest election in American history, with the most opposition candidates in US history...fails on a moral values basis (allegedly)

December-holiday season where all the Christmas and other holidays take the forefront of all Americans' attention

January-
Oil-for-Food investigation report is submitted
President marches down PA Ave and is inaugurated
Finally elections in Iraq

That's a rough 90 days for someone who still believes in the .007% chance of the conspiracies that the Dems tried to hoodwink the American people with.

"Hi, my name's John, and....I'm a Democrat"
"Hiiiiii, Johnnnnn"

[cvq3842]

LOL!