Posted on 12/08/2004 9:19:37 PM PST by CHARLITE
Following the Republican landslide victories of the 1994 midterm elections, conservatives watched in amazement as Republican “moderates” proceeded to completely squander the ground they had gained, culminating in the defeat of Bob Dole in ‘96. In the aftermath of this year’s elections, ominous signs point towards a repeat performance.
Apparently, Republican Party operatives didn’t really comprehend why, in the middle of Bill Clinton’s first term, they won big. And to this day, political analysts still don’t seem to grasp the situation. Among conservatives, the conventional wisdom is that the newly realigned GOP Congressional majority had wrongly presumed too much of a mandate, subsequently shocking the American people with an excessively bold agenda.
In truth however, the exact opposite took place. And if the Republican Party doesn’t quickly come to grips with this fact, it may find itself facing larger defeats in ‘06 and ‘08 than the Democrats just suffered.
By formulating the “Contract with America,” Newt Gingrich brilliantly highlighted the contrasts between the two parties. In presenting America with such a clear choice, he ensured that the liberalism of the Democrats would be on parade. The rest is history.
Yet in the aftermath of the elections, intense media pressure caused Gingrich and the Republicans to backtrack. Bob Dole’s “enough is enough” surrender to Clinton’s bloated 1995 budget sealed Dole’s fate in the following year’s presidential election. Despite Republican wins, the left still dominated.
In reality, the much-heralded “Republican Revolution” simply never happened. Where, for example, was a single bloated bureaucracy eliminated, or required to face even modest budget cuts at the hands of the Republicans?
Far from committing any conservative “excesses,” it was the abandonment of such things which disillusioned the “grassroots” and convinced them that “business as usual” still reigned supreme in Washington. Hence, they stayed home on Election Day in ‘96.
So, how have Republicans fared during the brief “lame duck” Congressional session following this year’s election? Initial signs are not encouraging. Rather than confronting the Democrats’ obstructionism, and their continued pandering to the counterculture, Republicans are once again waffling, conceding, and capitulating.
The recently passed “National Security Reform Act” is a prime example. Key to American security is regaining control of its borders. Amazingly, Congress decided to remove a provision from the security reform measure that would have clamped down on the ability of illegal aliens (such as the nineteen hijackers of 9-11) to obtain drivers’ licenses.
According to opponents of the provision, such discussion belongs in other legislation. Yet if the mass influx of undocumented foreigners isn’t relevant to the security of the nation, little else is.
Beyond all of the excuses, the reality of the situation is that the Republicans in the House and Senate have no stomach to confront the illegal alien issue, for fear of media backlash. They apparently remain clueless as to the receding relevance of the “mainstream” media, or the fact that their acquiescence to it will cause an enormous rift with the “base” from whom they so recently garnered electoral victories.
On another front, Senate Minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada highlighted the tight spot in which Senate Democrats presently find themselves. Completely abandoning any pretence of bipartisan cooperation, Reid pressed forward in the footsteps of his predecessor, the recently deposed Tom Daschle of South Dakota.
On a weekend talk show, Reid sounded like the standard, cliched, liberal Democrat of the Washington “insider” crowd, promising obstruction and rancor, but not surprisingly accompanied by the standard liberal demands that Republicans “reach across the aisle.”
If a groundswell of disapproval occurs in response to his caustic diatribe, Reid, being another partisan Democrat Senator from a “red state,” could eventually face a fate similar to that suffered by Daschle. Fortunately for Reid, Senate Republicans may well ride in to his rescue. Fearing possible negative ramifications from altering the present senate rules that allow legislation to be stalled by a forty vote filibuster, Republicans are again showing their reluctance to play “hard ball” when confronted with such obstructionism.
Presently, Democrats have been using this technique to thwart the appointment of judges who would uphold the Constitution. So, conservatives are left wondering what possible ramifications could be worse than a continued decimation of the Constitution.
John Kerry’s liberalism, when viewed against the backdrop of the War on Terror, provided the contrast that yielded significant Republican Congressional gains, and a victory for President Bush. If Republicans continue to erase that contrast, they will eventually erase their victory.
About the Writer: Christopher Adamo is a freelance writer from southeastern Wyoming, where he has been involved in grassroots political activites for several years. He maintains a website at http://www.chrisadamo.com Christopher receives e-mail at adamo.chronwatch@lycos.com
"Control of our borders" has nothing to do with "illegals getting drivers licenses".
Illegals get licenses only AFTER they've breached the border.
Or is this another one of those illegal immigration phrases such as "open borders" which don't really mean what they mean. (another way of excusing a lie after being caught)
Well perhaps you better pay closer attention.
Republicans did not have a strong enough majority to force anybody's hand. Even with the new congress, things are dicy.
So that means Al Gore will no longer be president come January?
It's too bad the republicRat "party-bots" place party over all of the wisdom of your post. When one concedes conservative principles, then what is the difference between a republicRat and a democRat? Nothing.
Following the Republican landslide victories of the 1994 midterm elections, conservatives watched in amazement as Republican “moderates” proceeded to completely squander the ground they had gained, culminating in the defeat of Bob Dole in ‘96.
>>>
That was fun! /XXXsarcasm
BTTT
The GOP's incremental Compromisism destroys America...
"Where, for example, was a single bloated bureaucracy eliminated, or required to face even modest budget cuts at the hands of the Republicans?"
How about welfare reform? An entitlement was ended -- or at least, it couldn't permanently be claimed. That's pretty good.
BTTT
The GOP's incremental Compromisism destroys America...
Some weak-kneed Republican Congressmen who initially opposed the massive new prescription drug entitlement program were strong-armed into voting for it. The white house’s rino-allies also managed to break the resistance to removing the illegal alien provisions from the Security Reform act. The Stupid party sure knows how to force things when it benefits liberalism.
Ain't that the truth...
"Following the Republican landslide victories of the 1994 midterm elections, conservatives watched in amazement as Republican “moderates” proceeded to completely squander the ground they had gained, culminating in the defeat of Bob Dole in ‘96. >>> That was fun! /XXXsarcasm"
BTTT!
I remember Newt giving the now ex-TRIMPOTUS the nod-nod, wink-wink to raid the slush fund to bail out Mexico...remember that?
You know what...
Illegals get licenses only AFTER they've breached the border.
My observation over the past few days would tend to indicate that your claim, while accurate, is far too abstruse for most people here to comprehend.
That was done from a pessimistic attitude of a disloyal opposition. That was done to provide aid and comfort to our enemies in time of war and with firefights in progress.
These criticisms are very different. They come not from an almost treasonous opposition to the nation, but from profound disappointment that the 'better angels' did not prevail in the GOP. From the ill-conceived Gonzales appointment, to apparently asking for Ashcroft's resignation, to Bush's 'open-borders' policy, to his support for Spectre in the campaign against a conservative (which story became well-known after the election) and his seeming support for Spectre as committee chairman, and whatever else, including overspending at the national level, it does appear that the GOP has said to its core voters - where else ya gonna go?
Now you may disagree. But if that's actually true, then as the writer points out - staying home is place to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.